Hi,
I spend a lot looking at many of those things, and the Computer/Music things are not very good, and they skip too many steps and do not discuss one piece of software enough for you to learn anything. The CM (Computer Music) early days for beginners was horrible and would switch programs after 2 small screenshots, and you wonder how you went from here to there ... for a beginner that's not good.
Most of these do not have the editorial capability to "teach" and help. It's all just a commercial for their own artists and software.
I do pick up Bass Guitar once in a while, and I do not dislike it ... however, their choice for players and interviews is ridiculous, and poor and they can not even discuss other bass players and their work around the world. There are far better players out there, but they are doing different music, and it would not fit the commercial/pop/jazz style that they are pushing.
Likewise, their continued discussion of the same guitars, over and over and over again, is getting old and pathetic. There are no new instruments, with different designs, and of course, no one plays them because they wouldn't know rock'n'roll.
That's a bit facile, and biZarre, and silly, and those magazines are nothing but a commercial advertising for whatever companies they can get to pay for the paper. They will be dead in a few years, as the digital editions will not bring in enough money for them!
As I mentioned before, the teaching of music is going to die out ... because of magazines like this, that are more interested in the stars that can not play much anyway, than they are in the music and its implementation and design. It's like only Bootsie can play an Am and Bapu can't ... it's ridiculous ... Bapu probably plays it better!