codamedia
For me there are two types of music.... "Stuff I Like", and "Stuff I don't Like".
I can understand the need for general categories.... but the breakdown of 50 different types of heavy metal seems pretty pointless to me. Just because an artist or band stretches out a little doesn't mean we need a new genre to accommodate them.
Just my 2 cents.... (Canadian cents at that - not worth anything these days)
Yep. We've talked about it before, but I only got into it because I was about to start loading around 300,000 songs into a new media player. They are from a LOT of different genres and styles. I don't care about making a bunch of subtle distinctions simply for the sake of categorizing and arguing differences on websites, but I want some organizing so I can play multiple tunes that sound good together.
I was pretty amazed at how many ways there were to categorize the same songs which is what makes it so overwhelming. You've got style, time-period, location, comparison to another style, time-period or location, and more! A single song could be rock, progressive, 60's, Canterbury Scene, folk, post-war, World and pop depending on the grouping and who you ask (not even counting the combination sub-genres like progressive rock, progressive folk, folk rock, pop rock or folk pop that could apply to the above example). I just basically don't want my Classical playing with my Metal, my New Age playing with my New Wave, my Jazz playing with my Pop, my Punk playing with my Blues, my Rock playing with my Electronica, etc. I haven't completely cleaned up the 103,000 tracks already loaded into my media player so I currently have 36 genres and over 250 sub-genres. Eventually I'll make playlists for different sub-genres and, if I can hear a significant difference between two of them (like you can with Gothic Rock and Soft Rock, or Ambient and Techno for example), then I'll keep the sub-genre otherwise things will get grouped down further.