UbiquitousBubba ... Speaking only for myself and the other musicians I've known personally over the years, the vast majority of us "doodle" on our instruments, experimenting with sounds and just playing for the fun of it....
I would never consider that this is not the case. Because I know it isn't the case.
UbiquitousBubba ... Playing for the feeling and for the mood can produce a lot of noise, but it sometimes results in a moment of genius. Some players regularly record their musical doodling just in case they tripped over something great.
I would be careful in wording this. Which came first, the chicken or the egg, kinda thing. There are just as many times when the "thing" is there, and you spend several months trying to interpret it and put it down, regardless of talent, or musical knowledge. Likewise, just as many folks spend many hours, days and what not refining something ... and still not be happy with it.
There is something here that you know about ... that you did not mention! You realize that many of the youngsters that went on to do "progressive rock", did not have 30 years of music training behind them, and they still put together AWESOME work, as have many others.
I can tell you from a rehearsal space, that sometimes, a few folks "grok it" (my favorite word for it!) and can continue off it from the first go. Others, have to gesticulate it in their minds and find the intentions and the emotional reactions for it. You make it sound like the "great" actors do not rehearse! Actually, most of them rehearse 5 to 10 times more than anyone else, and it is one of the reasons why they are good ... but they are in the search for seconds, inside a moment, not necessarily for a character, and this is akin to you just playing 3 notes, and it defines that whole song, but it ISN'T the whole song!
The parallels are the same! I'm not sure if musicians are more stuck on their theory and "learning", than they are in anything else. Almost 75% of them are into "jazz', or "rock", or "this or that", I have found, and asking them to try something else, or listen to something else, is scary for them, because it throws them OFF their "path", which, I guess (how stupid of me!) means they become lesser musicians ... hahaha!!!!
UbiquitousBubba ...The idea that musicians are too arrogant and/or stupid to experiment with music is grossly inaccurate.
I've tripped around with a few bands in my time taking pictures and had the chance to talk to many of them. In my whole life, only two of them, Christian Vander and Daevid Allen could talk "etherics" or "far out" stuff, and then go play their stuff ... there was no interference, or annoying anything!
Here, it's weird ... it's like ... I'm not sharing a secret! Guess what? Music or any art, is NOT about the secret of this or that ... it's about HOW GOOD YOU ARE AT TRANSLATING YOUR INNER VIBE. Just about everything else is ... as you say ... probably too mental a battle. It doesn't have to be, if your rehearsals are more than just a note and chord workout!
To suggest that only people with technical skills can do anything, is a bit weird, when the whole of the 20th century has been all about the breaking down of the "technical skill", in order to find something else in music, that is just as simple, and just as important, as anything that was previously done!
This does not take "doodling", any more than it takes "practice" ... what it takes is CONCENTRATION, which is diametrically opposed to practice. One is inversely proportional to the other! And this has been proven time and time again ... but many folks, even here, keep saying that only practice will make you good! ... it might not be solid enough, as it could be, and you can tell in the playing! Or better yet, in their songs ... and their ability to do more than just a redo of an old song! Well, even Robert Wyatt has done a few ... but you would be hard pressed to think ... that was The Rolling Stones' song?
UbiquitousBubba ... It's understandable that people who are unaware of the difficulty and complexity of learning an instrument might think that all we need to do is make noise at random to write music. That kind of experimentation only works after countless hours have been spent meticulously honing those mundane skills. To someone who is not a musician, those years spent practicing are nothing but wasted time. Musicians know it may take thousands of hours of practice to create a few seconds of great music. ...
Bubba ... the best actors out there will embarass you with this line! They rehearse in their sleep, in the mirror, in the shower ... non-stop! They will do it having lunch with you, even!
UbiquitousBubba ... That assessment is insulting to actors because, in my ignorance of the art form and its disciplines, I did not see the same level of discipline and skill in their performance as we musicians put into ours. ...
They both put in their time. Actors no less or more than you do! You just don't see it, because you do not consider a "person" performance important, since you have never considered the physical aspects, and other elements of acting, that add to the inner completeness of what you do. Most rock bands think that sexy is all they need, or a slight undressed woman at the front, to get some attention!
UbiquitousBubba ... We will gravitate towards random paint splatters, accidental noise, and mindless spasms. On the other hand, operating from a point of view that values order over chaos will reverse these approaches. Extreme focus on order may result in heartless realism, devoid of any emotion. Music may be mechanical and dull. Most of us will fall somewhere in the middle along this spectrum. Some of us may drift more towards order than chaos while others may run the other way.
I try not to define "music", any more than I do literature, any more than I do "art".
The spectrum from random to precise, is illusory for me ... the minute you find McLaughlin, the next day you hear a Gismonti, and then you hear a Django ... and then you hear Keith jarrett, and the word disappears, since the definitions for all of us are variable.
The funnies thing, was when directing, I was excellent at empty stages ... and just symbolic this or that ... a square, a platform, and nothing "real" ... you know why? It gave us room to go wider and further ... it gave us "space" to move, instead of being tied behind a chair next to a sofa and table! Music has the same "implications" as does literature and other arts ... we just think that they are all different ... and in the end, I keep simply saying ... it's the same source ... you INNER BEING ... and all I try to do is help bring it out.
This doesn't man that I'm going to ask Karyn to do Betty Boop, or Janet to do Lucy, or Bapu to do Fred Flinstone! But it would give them more freedom for interpretation, than just COPY what was done before, and be tied to something that is basically irreplaceable anyway in our minds.
Humility is one of the things that takes actors the furthest, and helps with confidence more than anything else, specially when you got "directors" that can be so mental as .... to be insane. In general, the "great" directors, tend to allow actors to do anything they want, and you will find this a lot, and of course, many actors love that freedom! You can't tell me that musicians do not like that, which we know is not true, or Yehudi Menuhin, John McLaughlin, Egberto Gismonti and countless other musicians would not have come anywhere near what they have done.
One last thing ... I do not "intelectualize", most pop music. Not because I think it's "less", but in general, there is a lot more out there than just a song ... and that is the only distinction I make ... it needs to be more than a song for me.!