bapu
carl
I think it's a useful approach for mixing audio tracks. I wouldn't use it for my normal projects using multiple vi's, audio+ midi, 3rd party plugins or automation.
Although people want it to be I don't think that's was ever intended to be a full blown daw.
I will not dispute that in today's vernacular a DAW should have unlimited buses but when I was a pup and used 24 track ADATs my console only had 4 buses (not including the master). I seemed to get by with that.
TBH, in SONAR I rarely have more than 8 buses (including the master).
Judicious planning and use of busses is a GOOD thing. If you really need more then 8 I think you
are "stetching"...while more then 8 can be handy...you can get buy with 8 and that should do the
job, "Drums" "Guitars" "Lead Vocal(s)" "BG Vocal(s)" "Bass" "Keys" ....there's usually not more then that...and
that still leaves 2 busses free...but I guess if you were doing a lot of "sub-grouping" you could
Use more...
I can easily get by with 8 without a hassle...
Mixbus isn't the "BE ALL - END ALL" of DAW's...it's a tool...just like every other DAW...
The thing that sets it apart is the "sound" and that DOES set it apart IMO...