ampfixer
I guess what I need is some sort of book. Do they make an idiots guide to getting ahead on the work of others? Maybe beat oriented music for old white guys?
Perhaps Craig could do a how to guide for using his content.
I say this as respectfully as possible because I know text can often get read the wrong way. You seem like a cool person so please don't get offended:
Part of your problem is attitude. Statements like this "getting ahead on the work of others" seem to indicate an attitude that inherently makes it difficult for you to utilize these tools. Is the guy who does not hollow out a log, skin an animal and stretch it to make a drum "getting ahead on the work of others? or better yet, is the guy who brings in a musician to play a simple element that is pretty much the same used and re-used chord progressions getting by on other people's work? No matter how many loops you have, the odds of becoming successful by simply tossing a few loops together are slim to none. People who actually use loops for production often put just as much work into creating their style of music as any other creator of music. Yes, occasionally there is the hit that is a blatant sample loop, but the cost of creating such a hit has made doing so too expensive for most. The peak of "throw a beat under a loop and have at it" passed in the 90's and will likely never return. Today most artists either use loops for idea generation or as extremely raw elements that are but a very small part.
There are many ways to use sample loops. I will start with an example of a simple loop being turned into something the originator could not have possibly conceived. I am guessing this is not a style of music you would listen to but it is for illustrative purposes. The original is a funk/soul break from "Amen Brother". This break has been twisted into literally thousands of songs within several genres
Original sample:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwQLk7NcpO4Turned into this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8uTXOlACmU#t=80and this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnMFIeDhT5Y#t=99 The latter uses a section of the break almost like a percusssion instrument where as the former preetty much tosses the loop into a Ninja blender and spits it out in an altered form that does not resemble the original loop rhythmically in any way. It takes a lot of work, especially if one is going old school and manually slicing every element of break into sub-elements. Again, not everyone's cup of tea, but far more difficult than the casual observer can imagine.
As far as Cakewalk including these loops to appeal to younger, EDM audiences, nothing could be further from the truth. The loops included are old, having been included with Sonar for years. When hardcore EDM enthusiasts come to this board they are loaded with complaints about how "Sonar is geared towards old guitarists" . Truth likely lies more in the middle. Sonar tries to appeal to a wide variety of users and can certainly be used for any genre. For an artists doing strictly EDM, Ableton, FL Studio and even Reason are probably better choices. For hip-hop creators, Sonar is certainly low on the wishlist even though it is more than possible to create either.
I think it is hard to understand how to make music of any type if you are not really a fan. The types of music you do play, you likely listened to the pioneers and stars of that genre with respect and admiration for decades. To expect to have it work any differently for any other genre is unrealistic. Using loops can be as straightforward or abstract as you choose, but if you are fixated on thinking of it as "work of others that was cut and paste together" you are doomed to find these things useless.