foxwolfen
Danny, you are judging my input based on assumptions derived only from the limited exposure you have had to my own music. Let us not get personal and attempt to ascribe differing philosophies to experience (as you are very wrong) or knowledge , or to nit pick over semantic use of words like fuzzy. Terry got the right idea, and that is all that matters.
Ok, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on the above. But you can't blame me. I've never heard anything of this nature from you, hear how you have a limited budget and limited gear, so I don't know the extent of what you've done or what you're capable of. My apologies for that. What I do see is, you comment really tough to people, so I'll take the tough (sometimes arrogant) talk as "you're in the know." from here on out, ok?
Just so you know, the term "fuzzy" in a distorted guitar situation, IS something that is worth nit-picking. A driven guitar sound can be called many things. Fuzzy, driven, over-drive, distorted etc. If a comment like that is made to me in one of my songs, the first thing I question is "hmmm...did I use too much over-drive?" Followed by "hmmm...fuzzy....maybe I didn't low pass enough and some high end frequencies are passing through making it sound fuzzy and unclear?"
Thus why I questioned if you were familiar with instrumental rock music because if you were, I would think you would know the proper terminology to use or at least explain what fuzzy meant to you. "It needs to be very clean" goes against the grain of having a distorted guitar sound. If he wanted clean, he wouldn't have used a sound with distortion, right? It wasn't a dig at you, I was honestly asking a question because your answer made no sense to me in THIS situation. "That's not what I meant Danny!" Well what did you mean? See my point? Speaking of "clean"...
There's another word that can have various meanings. Not played "cleanly"? Is that what you meant? This isn't nit-picking, it's the way you have to analyze a tune with distortion. If those words mean something else to you, it helps if you explain what they mean to you so the OP has a clue on what you're trying to tell him. I like to think I have a bit of experience in this field...yet I have no idea what you were talking about.
As you can see, it's important to explain things a bit better when there are so many different variables going on. The difference is, most times you choose brevity with a slightly sarcastic tone and opinion....I choose wordy explanations to where I try my best to make sure people know what my terminology means and no stone is left unturned. And I do this without attitude or bias while accepting someone that is 1960 sounding or 1990 sounding without making them feel they need to keep up with the times or I will annihilate their tune because I can and this is 2013. I'm still blown away everytime I see you post that "get with the times" comment. And you tell me I nit-pick? LOL! :) You didn't say that here, so I'll bite my tongue this time.
-Danny