Carissa Swenson
Jonbouy
In other words, folks should face up to courtesy, kindness and community here because it ISN'T the back alley of an urban jungle.
+1
Common courtesy is providing a handful of posts yet being highly critical of the forums demeanour?
May I suggest climbing off your high horse and joining in and rather than generalizing on the whole, commenting on specifics. Unless of course it is your aim to lead us all into the greater civil utopia our current ignorance blinds us too.
I'm assuming you can see things other than the brilliance of your own reflection when I say welcome to the Coffee House.
You'd be on better footing explaining how the correlation of post-quantity to license-to-criticize works. Obviously, it doesn't. I've not posted here for the very reason that my current post defines.
You see, it is comments just like yours that I address -- no matter what the literary level -- which come from spiteful minds with little apparent value other than to vent personal angst or harm another. Where does the sarcasm and scorn come from, and why does it belong here?
For me to be on a "high horse" in your mind because I note, carefully and with qualification, that some are bitter is an inappropriate bit of slashing. Where does that come from in you, in particular? Why do you soil this place with such a dark tongue? How would your attitude improve this forum?
Say in retort what clever things you may, but just for this one instance, address the core question. Why do you attack the person who doesn't attack you?
I just don't agree with your original assertion.
Post count doesn't relate to anything other than it would have been more courteous had you been a regular contributer here and still had criticisms of the forum at large.
On the whole, perhaps because I joined in with an attitude of goodwill at the outset, I find the forum participants to be very positive, friendly, helpful, given that why would I agree with you, and how does that make me spiteful?
I merely
suggested climbing down from your high horse and join in from the level of a peer. It's entirely your choice how you actually choose to engage with any participants here or not. Any demeanour failing it would seem is much closer to your doorstep than the forum participants in general.
So can you clarify the point where I attacked YOU rather than your, what I still percieve to be, fatuous comments.
Had I outright called you a narcissitic ego-maniac then you'd have had a point.