• Software
  • Why I did not jump on Harrison's Mixbus Black Friday Sale. (p.2)
2014/11/26 17:21:22
bapu
mike_mccue
 
Hello Cloud™


You're just too quick. I was going to TM that just yesterday but I had some issues with Arc'ing my drumagog and it slipped my mind.
2014/11/26 17:22:44
The Maillard Reaction
You ARC you Park™?
2014/11/26 17:26:04
bapu
I'm All Agog Over Drums™
2014/11/26 17:41:37
cecelius2
rtucker55
Man, I bought into the whole shi-bang also... Certainly hope they go easy on their early supporters.  Really, not sure what 64bit is going to bring to the table unless they add vsti support.


Me too!  I bought the complete vs last year, but am waiting on the 64bit vs3, which I also read somewhere that it will support vsti instruments.  Not sure when they will finaly get vs3 out.  Hopefully soon.  That addition will make this much more useful.  Not that I will give up Sonar, but for some projects, I would just use Mixbus from start to finish.  
 
At least I know that others here are watching for that update.
2014/11/26 17:42:30
The Maillard Reaction
I'm doing drum replacement today too.
 
On my brand new chord progression.
 
I moved the snare mic about an inch to the left, and it picked more ring than snazz so I just put it back where the snazz is atz and I'll give it another try.
 
 
 
2014/11/26 17:43:43
bapu
mike_mccue
I'm doing drum replacement today too.
 
On my brand new chord progression.
 
I moved the snare mic about an inch to the left, and it picked more ring than snazz so I just put it back where the snazz is atz and I'll give it another try.
 
 
 


flac, sfz or wav?
 
I'd use a PONO if I had juan.
2014/11/26 17:58:09
The Maillard Reaction
I need PONO like a bicycle needs a fish?
 
 
 
Much happier with the snare now... I heard the ring from the beginning but I couldn't get myself to stop playing so I had to DrumAgain™
 
 
2014/11/26 19:43:30
Jeff Evans
You don't have to view Harrison Mixbus as a start to end DAW to produce in.  There is always that partial ground where Mixbus can be used.
 
The trick to it is to use your DAW as you normally do and go right to the end in terms of your mix.  But instead of summing everything in your current DAW export a series of stereo stems.  You should be able to represent even the most complex mix with a handful of stereo stems and a few individual tracks.
 
The trick is to import those things into Mixbus and just do the final polishing and summing there instead.  Their plugins are great as is their reverb too.  But most of all is the sound.  It does have this sweet Harrison type sound to it.
 
The three EQ's on the tracks, buses and the masterbuss are all different.  The tape saturation is very controlled.  I am not a big fan yet of the dynamics processors but that may only need more time to get to know them better.
 
I started actually mastering full stereo premastered tracks too making it easier to get to grips with.  Their mastering processors are very good indeed.  Once you get that down then you can start bringing more into it and getting it to do more as time goes on.
 
It will be a long time yet before it will have all the features required to do a complete audio/midi session on it with all effects.  But in the mode I am suggesting it actually rocks bigtime, now.
 
 
2014/11/26 20:31:51
Rain
My intention when I bought it was to use it to mix projects created in Logic. There are projects which I prefer to complete in Logic (my own weird stuff) but for the less unorthodox things, I felt like a second DAW could be welcome.
 
I liked the sound of Harrison a lot, and I also liked having all the EQ/Comp controls right there on the channel strips. I actually had the chance to attend a session a few years back with the old 4032 - same as Bruce Swedien used for Thriller. Talk about an epiphany moments...
 
Unfortunately, with MixBus, there was too much of a performance difference on my computer when I tried it - it felt clunky - so I basically gave up on it and stuck to what worked. 
 
I'm guessing that the performance would be much better on the new studio computer, but I finally upgraded Pro Tools and I'm using that as a mix environment. Sometimes I toy with the idea of re-installing it, but I am still too hesitant when it comes to installing more than what's essential on this shiny new iMac. And to be honest, the Pro Tools channel strip just works for me - it doesn't have this or that sound but it really helps me putting together a mix that makes sense. I can alway use Waves or McDsp or such to warm things up a bit.
2014/11/30 05:17:59
kennywtelejazz
I have created Mixbus projects in Win 8 , OSX10.7.5 and XP .
Then I opened them up in all 3 OS's …..meaning all different OS's from the OS I had created them in .
 
I notice that people keep forgetting that Mixbus projects will open regardless of what OS the project was done on . 
 
Yo Peeps , can you dig the gravity of what I'm talking about ? Mixbus being able to do that should count for something 
 
Kenny
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account