craigb
When bands change their style, instead of getting bent, if I like the new stuff I just subconsciously pretend it's a different band. If it stinks, especially if it shows a huge lack of effort, then I get annoyed (I'm a bit more lenient when a band really tries a new direction, but it just doesn't work).
I think it's a game you just can't win as an artist. Either you'll be accused of repeating yourself, either you'll be accused of selling out.
I understood that at a young age as a Metallica fan. People were accusing them of selling out as early as their 3rd album (maybe as early as their second, actually).
Me, I liked that they kept on evolving - it allowed me to keep on enjoying their music. For me, selling out would have been to try to hide their evolution as people and musicians and to keep on pretending that they were angry and broke teenagers when they were millionaires and had grown to discover and appreciate all kinds of music.
From my perspective, Load and Reload were the most honest thing they could have done at that point - and I could relate to that a lot more than if they'd denied that evolution.
Same for U2. People were criticizing them way back... I remember reading a review of Rattle and Hum that criticized them, saying that they were spending millions trying to keep up their "simple band" image.
Though I may lose interest in them, I rarely criticize bands because they evolve and try new things, though I feel that they tend to reach a point where they've pretty much dilapidated their potential and simply lose me.
As for Bono... That South Park episode a few years ago pretty much summed it up for me. ;)