batsbrew
any moderator, will become a whipping boy.
Seriously, how many times can you think of that these forums required the kind of heavy-handed moderation that would make someone a whipping boy?
Now, I have been in forums where this was an issue. I took over as moderator of the Political Party forum at Harmony Central because all previous moderators had tried to be conscientious and fair, which is impossible in that context. So they ran away screaming and no one else would do it. If the Political Forum vitriol level ranged from 1 to 10 (most vitriol), the worst the CW forums have ever dished up is about 0.000000013.
Again Willy can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the motivation here is to use moderation to sanitize the forums, but to organize the forums for maximum effectiveness, keep out the spammers, gently steer things in the right direction if things go off-course, and not have the community think no one is listening. I've never gotten the feeling anyone at CW felt the forums needed to be hosed down with Lysol and ammonia.
(By the way, I solved the whipping boy problem in the poli forum simply by promising that my moderation would be arbitrary and inconsistent. Whenever someone complained I was being arbitrary and inconsistent, I'd tell them that a) I was merely fulfilling my promise, and b) I didn't care what they thought. Eventually people stopped complaining. Most people liked the moderation style anyway. Forums are not to be taken too seriously.)