Most of us came into this recording stuff from the standpoint of a musician. That, I think, is the source of much of our unrealistic expectations for music software.
Remember the first time you held a real Strat in your hands? Compared to your starter guitar from the pawnshop, it was like a seductive woman whispering Play Me! And you really could play things that would have made your fingers bleed on your old guitar.
Or, if you're a piano player like me, the first time you sat down at a Steinway concert grand and marveled at how light the action was, and how you could play really quietly or really loud. Your old beat-up upright at home just couldn't do that. If you tried to play it lightly it often made no sound at all.
In either case, your next thought was: how on earth am I going to come up with the money for one of these? It didn't even occur to you that "making do" with what you already had was a viable option.
We grew up thinking that expensive instruments were better, that new instruments would inspire creativity and improve our playing.
Those beliefs are mostly true.Unfortunately, they don't translate to software. A new EQ or compressor is probably not going to make your mixes sound better. A different DAW will not inspire better compositions. Another synthesizer isn't going to be your ticket to sonic nirvana. Music is all about taking the sounds that are already around you and assembling them into something new.
So why was an image of Pro-Q2 floating over my head when I woke up this morning, accompanied by the smooth voice of Dan Worrall saying "that's all I've got time for in this video"? Like the spirit of Yoda vanishing after only hinting at Luke's true destiny.