So it's my fault then.
And I'm not quite sure what to say to be honest, but I'll try.
I'm all for a good laugh and a joke, and a bit of light-hearted inanity. Surely everyone here knows that?
And yes, I'd be the first to admit that I've posted drivel in many 'serious' threads - but most often to prick the smugness of some self-righteous prick upstairs.
But for the life of me, I don't understand why idiotic posts and silly pics have any place in a genuine thread like that particular example. Yes, lighten things up for sure, but we were actually trying (albeit fruitlessly, as it proved) to rally up a bit of support for someone who feels he's been a bit hard done by. Anyway, and as per Seth's comments when he locked that thread, I'll say no more about that.
But surely anyone with a bit of common decency could see there was some serious stuff being said in there, and maybe it wasn't the place for puerility?
The way I see it, I've as much right to express my opinion that I don't think it was appropriate as anyone else has to actually post it. Where do you draw the line? I don't know. If I'd had the bad taste to have posted a 'funny' cartoon in the thread when we were raising money for dear Jimmy Gentry, I've absolutely no doubt that Reece and others would have had no compunction in pointing out my error of judgement.
When push comes to shove, I thought that we were all grown up enough to take a bit of genuine criticism. Or if we felt slighted and believed to have been the recipient of unfair criticism, to at least say so and then have a rational discussion about it.
I've got it wrong many, many times in the past. But hopefully, I've always managed to man-up and apologise (in public) if I've overstepped the mark or made a fool of myself.
In this particular case, I'll happily apologise for the
way I stated my opinions in that thread - I certainly could have expressed my concerns more tactfully, and in private. But I stand by my honest opinion that irrelevant banality had no place in that thread.