Steeve ..i feel you but switching to PT isn't about the VS 700 ? !
i also have the nucleus on my mind but i tell you wait and test , the drivers are terrible and people are still waiting for this to be fixed ...
Now let's talk about Sonar : this daw is excellent , cake is trying to do the right things , but if the guyz want to be the number "2" they have to propose control solutions !!! steinberg failed , no other daw proposes good surfaces (like (avid) for PT) and the VS 700 is really the best around after them (i'm not talking Tango , support is alwayz rock n roll , working great with a daw and just enought with another ,)
So what to do ? praising cake to do one ? i don't think so ... they don't decide ....
Roland ? even people working at Roland don't have the long term visisbility ...
So what ? i was seriously thinking of putting big money on the dev of one control surface beacuse there's a fukkkking market for that and we need one !! but time is what i don't have "3 kids , older 6 years old ;))
So what can we do ? : Lobby !!!!
We have to put the pressure on firms that knows how to do a controller to make one for sonar for exemple ....the new core app of sonar X.x is excellent , and they already have a model to enhance (the VS 700) ...we can also try to conviced Cakewalk to give them some infos about how the VS 700 have been implemented and how they would like to be (but they didn't managed to do since their moving marging are ridiculous within the Roland firm) ....
Is that all we can have (by we i'm talking all daw) : Ipad , Mackie , euphonix (toy) ect ....