2014/02/19 11:43:09
drewfx1
What you're going to see if you do that Mike is exactly what you see now if you just look at any waveform before and after you put it through a filter. Do you really want to go through multiplying each sample by each coefficient and adding them together? IMO, it's going to be very tedious and not very enlightening.
 
 
But you can think about it this way - filters work by "remembering" the previous samples (the capacitor does this in the analog world) and using phase shift.
 
Consider that at a given sampling frequency there is a phase difference between adjacent samples based on the relationship between the frequency of the signal and the sampling frequency. At low frequencies the phase shift is very small - 0° at 0Hz (aka DC) and 180° at the Nyquist frequency (exactly 1/2 the sampling rate = exactly 2 samples per cycle = 180° phase difference).
 
So basically what is happening is you are phase shifting your original signal with the single sample delays, multiplying the signal that has been phase shifted by the appropriate coefficients, and then adding the result back into the original signal. This will either add or cancel at a given frequency, and to varying degrees depending on the amount of phase shift at a given frequency and the value of the coefficient (including whether it's positive or negative).
2014/02/20 15:35:06
bitflipper
You guys and your Science stuff!
 
Our good friend Danny D has said that there's no room in music for science, an opinion often echoed on such authoritative sources as Gearslutz.
 
You haven't yet addressed the pixie-dust coefficient, the factor that makes one equalizer sound better than the others. 
 
 
BTW, for those reading this thread with a big cartoon question-mark hovering over their head, one of the best simplified explanations I've come across is in Mr Aldrich's book, required reading for anyone dipping their toes into the technical side of things generally.
2014/02/20 16:19:14
dmbaer
bitflipper
 
BTW, for those reading this thread with a big cartoon question-mark hovering over their head, one of the best simplified explanations I've come across is in Mr Aldrich's book, required reading for anyone dipping their toes into the technical side of things generally.



Er ... thanks, Bit ... I guess.  Damn Amazon and it's insidious "buy with one click"!
2014/02/20 17:00:51
drewfx1
bitflipper
You guys and your Science stuff!
 
Our good friend Danny D has said that there's no room in music for science, an opinion often echoed on such authoritative sources as Gearslutz.

 
That's OK - sometimes I think there's no room in science for musicians either (present company excepted). 
 

You haven't yet addressed the pixie-dust coefficient, the factor that makes one equalizer sound better than the others. 



If you use a complex number (a + bi) for the coefficient, b equals the pixie-dust part.
2014/02/21 13:23:35
bitflipper
You're so good with explanations, Drew! Maybe next you could address what makes a compressor "musical". 
 
 
 
2014/02/21 15:36:48
drewfx1
I recommend putting compressors through a thorough course of musical study:

12
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account