What I fail to understand is why any scandal of note since his notorious
faux pas automatically seems to get the suffix "gate" added to it.
I've never been able to see the reason, other than inexcusably lazy journalism. If similar scandals were described as "Watergate-esque" or some other awkward description I would get it, but just to add 'gate' doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Or am I missing something?
The press over here were recently presented with the perfect opportunity to display the total absurdity of this practise in the matter of the police officers who accused Tory MP Andrew Mitchell of calling them "plebs" when they refused to allow him to ride his bicycle through the gates leading into Downing Street.
Most chose not to label the affair 'Gategate', or even the slightly more amusing 'DowningStreetgate', but instead used the derogatory word he was alleged to use to come up with the ridiculous "Plebgate".
In fact, thinking about it, the absurdity of this convention means that to be strictly accurately applied, "DowningStreetgate" should have really been termed "DowningStreetgate
gate".
As this is all Nixon's fault, I'm much in agreement with Batsy's impressions of the man