• Software
  • ARC 2 Advanced Room Correction System | IK Multimedia (p.6)
2012/07/28 13:19:54
Beagle
bought for $75, downloaded and installed.  it found my previous measurements and warned me that they are from a previous version and all features won't be available.  I selected the measurement from the old system (measured in April 2012) and it warned me again and told me exactly what wouldn't be available.

I'll take new measurements soon with the new ARC.
2012/07/28 13:26:55
bapu
Reece, remember to check the proper mic type and set interface to 48KHz (if you don't already).
2012/07/28 14:59:00
Beagle
check!
2012/07/28 15:15:41
IK Obi
So I take it you guys are all liking the new ARC? You can really hear a difference in quality with the recent integration of the MultEQ® XT32 technology.
2012/07/28 16:04:01
ltb
It's working fine here. The low end is tighter & less 'phasey' sounding than the previous version.

I like the new alt reference templates. I've been working with all day on several large projects- very stable, no crashing or problems to report.


The intro upgrade price is reasonable too, nice job all around.
2012/07/28 16:11:10
gustabo
bapu


Reece, remember to check the proper mic type and set interface to 48KHz (if you don't already).


I don't think that you have to do this.

IIRC, whenever I ran the tests with v1 of ARC, the software automatically set my MOTU to 48KHz for the testing phase and returned it to 44.1KHz when it was done.

I know that I didn't change anything.
2012/07/29 15:48:53
IK Obi
Yeah the ability to check your mixes on different sounding playback systems is a very important feature to us. Can save you money instead of having to pay for multiple systems and time from having to check them soo much on other systems.
2012/07/29 16:20:34
Beagle
gustabo


bapu


Reece, remember to check the proper mic type and set interface to 48KHz (if you don't already).


I don't think that you have to do this.

IIRC, whenever I ran the tests with v1 of ARC, the software automatically set my MOTU to 48KHz for the testing phase and returned it to 44.1KHz when it was done.

I know that I didn't change anything.


Yes, actually it did for me as well.  but I didn't want bapu to feel unneeded. 
2012/07/29 16:52:43
bapu
Beagle
Yes, actually it did for me as well.  but I didn't want bapu to feel unneeded.   

Betterer than having me do a bazz track that NEVER sees the light of day
2012/07/29 18:40:41
Beagle
bapu


Beagle
Yes, actually it did for me as well.  but I didn't want bapu to feel unneeded.   

Betterer than having me do a bazz track that NEVER sees the light of day


DANG!!!  I thought I uninstalled NAGBAP!!! 
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account