dmbaer
cclarry
they're touting it as something "spectacular"...
I certainly wouldn't bet on it....as I've stated before, if it's not the BE ALL AND END ALL
of Samplers..they might as well just "shut the line down"
Don't agree. I'm going to suggest that ST3 merely has to be a) solid b) easy to use and c) not overly expensive to upgrade. Why? I, like a whole lot of others (I assume) have a deep collection of samples in the ST proprietary format. That will motivate an upgrade all by itself. If ST3 also happens to be spectacular, so much the better. But I'll acquire ST3 even if it's only got an improved GUI, works in 64-bit and doesn't cost a ridiculous amount.
I have EVERY SampleTank, etc...expansion out there...bought 'em all....don't care...
I'll convert them if I have to ...and there are a lot of ways to do it...
As I stated...most can't help themselves...they'd spend their money on poop if they thought it was gold...
and these companies know this...that's why they just tell the one's who do "call them out" to just go away...
they know that many will buy regardless...Politicians use the same principle...somewhere, somehow, SOMEONE
has to put them in their place...I know it won't be me...but if I start the boulder rolling it WILL catch them...eventually...
There's NOTHING in the IK line that you can't find comparable with, or better then...
So I stand my ground....