• Software
  • Sonic Maximizer from MF for $0.00... (p.2)
2013/10/20 14:06:28
bitflipper
I wouldn't add it to my collection even if it really was $0.00. Not worth the half-megabyte of disk space it would take up.
2013/10/20 15:28:51
yorolpal
It's the hardware box, Bit.  Still tho...$0.00 seems a little steep.
2013/10/20 22:01:51
TheSteven
If it was $0.00 and had free shipping I would go for it.  Otherwise, meh...
(I put it in my kart when I got the email too)
2013/10/21 00:18:53
vintagevibe
bitflipper
I wouldn't add it to my collection even if it really was $0.00. Not worth the half-megabyte of disk space it would take up.




In the days of tape they were indispensable but with digital I don't use it anymore.  But... for live performance they are great.  Just the bass curve alone is worth the price but the high end process can really help the mix cut through.  I just ordered one.
2013/10/21 02:02:35
Jeff Evans
It is not good for anything including live. I get a fantastic bottom end live and highs that just cut right through too and I do it all without a BBE Sonic Maximiser. All the great live engineers I have heard and met weren't using one either. Funny about that.
 
Anyone who passes something as impotant as a mix in a recording situation or an entire live mix through a cheap suspect box is suspect IMO. Learn to do it without. You will save money, one thing less to connect up and your live or studio mixes will just sound better for it. You are taking the easy way out instead of working just that little bit harder to achieve a better result without it.
2013/10/21 10:41:05
bitflipper
yorolpal
It's the hardware box, Bit.  Still tho...$0.00 seems a little steep.


 
I wouldn't add it to my collection even if it really was $0.00. Not worth the half-megabyte of disk 2U rack space it would take up.
 
Fixed.



2013/10/21 10:48:54
vintagevibe
Jeff Evans
It is not good for anything including live. I get a fantastic bottom end live and highs that just cut right through too and I do it all without a BBE Sonic Maximiser. All the great live engineers I have heard and met weren't using one either. Funny about that.
 
Anyone who passes something as impotant as a mix in a recording situation or an entire live mix through a cheap suspect box is suspect IMO. Learn to do it without. You will save money, one thing less to connect up and your live or studio mixes will just sound better for it. You are taking the easy way out instead of working just that little bit harder to achieve a better result without it.


What a ridiculous post. It can make live mixes sound better if you know how to use it which it seems you don't.  I suspect you've never used one.  Perhaps you should learn to mix without EQ since that's just taking the easy way out and just one more thing to connect.  I have many years experience mixing live and I know what sounds good to me and what doesn't.  Your statements are made from total ignorance.  Don't mix by what others tell you.  Use your ears.  But perhaps first you should ask other live engineers if they use their ears so you'll know it's OK.
2013/10/21 10:50:51
vintagevibe
bitflipper
yorolpal
It's the hardware box, Bit.  Still tho...$0.00 seems a little steep.


 
I wouldn't add it to my collection even if it really was $0.00. Not worth the half-megabyte of disk 2U rack space it would take up.
 
Fixed.





1/2 U rack space.
2013/10/21 14:46:34
Jeff Evans
The thing is my observations are based on total experience. I had one of the first hardware units when they first came out. Had several since including software. I was seduced by the whole concept like many of us. I used it on mixes, used it live, tried it everywhere.
 
But after some careful listening I found I preferred the sound of anything without it. I found it was totally unnecessary, especially live. I have a lot of live experience, probably much more than most. The live sound you get is very dependent on how you set up your PA and tune it to the room. I don't even use pink noise much these days to tune PA's, although it can be helpful at times. I find all you need is a great reference CD. I use Steely Dan's 'Everything Must Go' as my ref. I know it very well and it how it is meant to sound on expensive monitors. I just adjust the FOH EQ until I hear what it should sound like and that is it. From that point on the PA sounds perfect. Perfect bottom and top end. No need for any boxes such as this. It just takes skill that is all in setting up your FOH EQ.
 
I mix on large systems that are built into venues here in Melbourne. When I come in to set up I often encounter a ridiculous FOH EQ from the idiot the previous night. Looks like a dogs hind leg. Put on Steely Dan, sounds like crap usually. What is funny is that when I set the FOH EQ completely flat Steely Dan often sounds very close to perfect. (Well done to the guys who installed it and lined it up) Only have to tweak subs (they are often just too loud but easily controlled and put back in their place) and one or two faders at most to get the perfect FOH sound out front. Then after doing a killer mix all night the bar people and venue owners come up to me and say they have never heard the PA sounding that good ever! That is using my ears my friend and nothing else. NO BBE boxes involved there either. So it shows clearly they are not needed, just lots of ear skill that is all.
 
I also use Steely Dan to tune the foldback system and then just roll off the highs above about 7K to stop any HF squeal feedback and then the musicans tell me they have never heard the FB system sounding so good as well.
2013/10/21 16:40:46
vintagevibe
I mix in small venues on a small line array system that doesn't use compression drivers.  After it is correctly set up it sounds better with BBE.  
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account