Hey guys,
Here's my take on MixBus vs. SONAR.
The setup. The CHB records all their track separately and then pools them in an online repository. I took the song with the least tracks. 16 to be exact.
I created a session in MixBus and I imported those tracks. I did a quick level and pan mix just so that nothing jumped out in the wrong place.
I created a fresh project in X2a and imported the exact same 16 files/tracks. Then I set the levels and pan that I set for the MixBus project.
ESPECIALLY NOTE: I put absolutely no FX of any kind in either project.
I've been A/B-ing them for about 30 minutes now.
My conclusion is that SONAR X2a is bit darker. Especially on the bass guitar which in this case has a distortion pedal that was burned into the track.
Now for $39 did I get overly WOWED? Not overly but I was impressed how out of the gate MixBus sounded tighter.
I guess what I'm saying is that for $149 I would not have thought I got that much worth out of it, but for $39 I am moderately impressed.
Footnote: TT-DR reported both exports at a DR of 13, however there was a discrepancy in the peak values:
-----------------------------------------------
Statistics for: BTB-VER-A.wav
Number of Samples: 8158848
-----------------------------------------------
left right
Peak value: -1.00 dB --- -1.00 dB
Avg RMS: -14.75 dB --- -15.13 dB
DR channel: 12.45 dB --- 12.94 dB
-----------------------------------------------
Official DR value: DR13
===============================================
-----------------------------------------------
Statistics for: BTB-VER-B.wav
Number of Samples: 7938048
-----------------------------------------------
left right
Peak value: over --- 0.00 dB
Avg RMS: -14.22 dB --- -14.37 dB
DR channel: 13.10 dB --- 12.49 dB
-----------------------------------------------
Official DR value: DR13
===============================================
If anyone is interested in obtaining the exports for their own A/B, PM me.