2013/10/06 16:15:10
Jonbouy
craigb
Could be.




That's just the kind of comment I'd expect from you!
 
I feel I can no longer take part in this thread if that's the kind of negative response you are going to come up with.  If there were lines I could have read between in that post I'm sure they would have been there.  So, I'm going to reprimand you just in case.
 
So there!
 
And don't think you can persuade me to come back to this thread either.
 
(at least, without a sizeable fee being involved)
2013/10/06 18:24:44
craigb
-----------
Could be.
-----------
 
(Is that better?)
2013/10/06 19:23:41
Randy P
Might be the first forum suicide I've seen that was due to a misunderstanding. Come on back Larry. Lets have a chuckle about this.

Randy
2013/10/06 20:11:15
jbow
Didyou know that Bub spelled backwards is buB?
 
I miss Bub... is he still happy over at Ess Uno ?
2013/10/06 23:10:31
trimph1
jbow
Didyou know that Bub spelled backwards is buB?
 
I miss Bub... is he still happy over at Ess Uno ?


Seems to be.
:whistleface:
2013/10/07 18:14:44
Andrew Rossa
cclarry
Andrew Rossa [Cakewalk]
sharke
I think the thread in question deserved at least a little ragging. It was entitled "Bad impressions of X3" and yet consisted of a few cut and paste quotes from people on other forums talking about Cakewalk and Gibson as companies - none of it related to anyone's actual bad impression of X3 the product.  
 
So in my opinion it was spreading needless negativity simply by virtue of its title. If I see a post title like that then I'm immediately going to think "uh-oh, someone's had a bad experience with X3." Who wouldn't? So to open it up and find that it was nothing more than a couple of quotes about Roland, Gibson, and past versions of Sonar....well I'm not surprised it got a negative response. 




Ok, to all, I come in peace. I remember this thread. The title was completely misleading and the the person who started it posted stuff that had nothing to do with X3 or anyone's actual impressions.
 
I edited the subject line.
 
Then I took another step to check the OP and he had about 12 posts or something. I looked at his email and he made very little effort to hide his real identity. Someone we have banned here about 50 times. You probably know who it is. I believe he is also using another alias. I deleted the thread and banned at least one of his identities. 
 
The point is we don't try to be heavy handed. We can accept criticism. I am not sure what others said afterwards but the thread was removed due to the GP...I mean OP.
 
I just want to clarify this point. 
 
Please continue on with your conversation :)




This is the icing on the CAKE...very sad Andrew...very sad...
This statement says VOLUMES about the character of you
as a Cakewalk employee, and Cakewalk in general as a company.  

I think it's time to move on...to my friends I bid you a civil adieu...
because, based on this...I'm banning myself from the forum...
and from Cakewalk....you will greatly be missed.  I cannot, in 
good conscience, continue to support a Company that behaves
like this, and it saddens me greatly.
 
 




Huh? I'm so confused. I am sorry if I offended you. This wasn't directed at you or this thread. This was in reference to the thread on the SONAR forum which I put in quotes. And also had nothing to do with Rain. I apologize if there was a misunderstanding. 
2013/10/07 18:53:00
michaelhanson
The Coffee House is such a confusing place. Unless of course the discussion is about becan.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account