jbow
When you guys are saying "backup" are you talking about a drive clone? I want to have it so that I can just get a new drive if one dies and have everything ready to install on it and be as if it never failed... and I NEED easy. I am a computer user not a builder or programmer in any form or manner, I need a button to click that does everything I need without asking me questions I don't know the answer to... if that exists.
Thanks... I will probably go with Acronis 2015 and if there is anything that I don't completely understand I will ask someone.
What about drives? Would it be easier for me to buy one 3G SATA drive or three SATA drives that are the same size and the ones I am cloning/backing up?
Thanks again!
J
A true drive clone is an exact copy of a drive down to the volume serial numbers. You don't want to have two of these installed at the same time as Windows won't be able to tell them apart very easily (other than drive letter which is not much used internally). Especially you don't want to clone your system drive and reboot with old and new installed.
An image of a drive is a file, much like a zip archive, of drive data. It could be all the data, or some part of the data, like an incremental backup, or a backup of the documents and settings. You need the program software to interpret or make use of an image, it isn't directly usable by windows, usually.
As for numbers of drives, I would recommend a 4TB drive not the 3TB drives (I assume you mean 3TB not 3G). 3TB drives, at least those by Seagate, had some reliability issues. The 4TB seem much better.
But there could be advantages to having fewer smaller drives. For example, you could have a 3-stage backup process with three drives - one is current, the next is the previous backup, the next even older, and you always rotate these. This gives you physical redundancy and perhaps is more secure. With a single drive you mix them all up and have to sort by date to find what you want. No big deal either way. Probably 1 big drive is cheaper than several smaller drives of the same total size.
If you clone a drive, you can just swap out failures with a clone.
If you image a drive, you have to restore the image onto another drive (or the old one if it still works).
The clone is quicker, but you can only have one clone on a drive, while you can probably fit many images from various times on a single big image drive.
Lastly, if you keep your system partition fairly small, so the C drive just has the OS and installed programs - and your user settings, documents, sound stuff, etc., are elsewhere. Then an image backup of the system is fairly small and quick.
I have a lot of software installed, but the C drive backup is just over 60GB in size. This takes about 10 or 15 minutes to backup and validate and just as quickly may be restored. So I can more easily restore a faulty system than try to debug some new problem.
However, when you separate things, you have to be wary about problems caused when the program defaults are not handled well (for example, the Rapture Pro multisample content and program paths are hard-coded or something like that.)
And, if you back up these small system images often, you don't need system restore points. Turning them off will give you a lot of free space, perhaps many GB of data, depending on your settings. Removing system restore points will speed things up a little and improve file defragmentation, but it is a subtle thing.
The more you get into this, the more you need to be aware of.
Since you want the simplest thing - the drive clone procedure is perhaps the easiest for you. But if you have a single drive with lots of samples and stuff one it, it could take several hours to clone. So you won't be doing that very often. Small system images can be done very frequently, on the other hand, and you can have them going back in time for many months. They all still fit on the single backup drive.