Been using the Vladg stuff for the last month or so, really great stuff, the Molot is awesome.

How do you use the Molot? Have you used it on the master bus or with individual tracks? I think it has a lot of potential too. Limiter No.6 is the real deal for sure!

Hello!  Another Vladg fan here.  Amazing that he's literally giving away his stuff. 
 
My favorite application for Molot has been on the drum bus.  Try the "Overheads" preset and tweak from there. 
 
(I have no affiliation with Vladg ... just a happy user.)
 
Eddie
 

Just saw they updated Limiter No6 to v101.

Changes in 1.0.1:

• Mac VST version 64-bit support was added;
• High CPU load related GUI issues were fixed;
• DirectX GUI acceleration for Windows Vista/Seven was enabled

doncolga

bitflipper


If you want to compare all your songs at once (along with any reference recordings) with a single tool, Toscanalyzer is very cool.

Cool indeed.  I'll be downloading asap.

Be aware that it's for "Non-commercial use" only.
 
So, it's fine if you're a hobbyist and giving your music away... Otherwise, a  definite no-no.   
 

How would anyone know? It doesn't watermark files.

Indeed, who would know? Plus, it's really the kind of tool that amateurs and semi-pros like us would use. I doubt anyone pays Chris Lord-Alge $400 an hour to consult a wave analysis report.

bitflipper


Indeed, who would know? Plus, it's really the kind of tool that amateurs and semi-pros like us would use. I doubt anyone pays Chris Lord-Alge $400 an hour to consult a wave analysis report.

Chris Lord-Alge?  Seriously?
 
There are thousands of "amateurs and semi-pros" who have tunes for sale on SoundClound, iTunes, etc.   That constitutes "commercial use".
 
And as far as "Who would know?.... Well, I would. 
 
And if I can't be expected to do the right thing (ie. adhere to the license agreement) with the software I use, then how can I expect some level of honesty from the people who might buy my music (as opposed to them just downloading a bootleg copy)? 
 

I highly doubt that 'commercial use' means using on it on material that's commercially released but rather distributing the software itself.
To expect the former would be ridiculous.

carl


I highly doubt that 'commercial use' means using on it on material that's commercially released but rather distributing the software itself.
To expect the former would be ridiculous.

"Commercial use" typically means both.  If they mean "distributing" they typically say "distributing".  The same with "commercial-use".  Sorry if you find it ridiculous, but I didn't come up with those terms. 
 
For an example of commercial license, look at the Reaper license explanation below.  It's pretty self-explanatory.
 
http://www.reaper.fm/purchase.php