Along the usual ongoing Waves/Toontracks/etc special, AD just announced over 50% off on all D-16 Plug-ins.

I've recently demo'ed Fazortan, as suggested by Bit - amazing phaser, for a mere $22. And if you've had your eyes on LuSH-101, now might be the occasion...

It models "Operational Transconductance Amplifiers" which is a fancy way of saying "Op-Amp"... which is a fancy way of saying "transfer function"... which is a fancy way of saying "equation"... which is a fancy way of saying it does math.










So it sounds good?

mike_mccue



So it sounds good?

D16's effects are a bit different. Not goto effects for standard phaser, chorus reverb etc. They are for when you want something out or the ordinary. They sound very good indeed!

For the first time in months... I'm intrigued by the possibility that something might actually be remarkably different.

I may have to grab it.

Thanks.


:-)

Rain

 And if you've had your eyes on LuSH-101, now might be the occasion...

Yep, at 85 bucks, this is getting close to no-brainer territory.  This is a wonderful instrument, IMO.  However, not everybody likes it as much as I (and it's CPU hungry with no multi-threading), so grab a demo copy first.  But you're not likely to see it at a better price for quite a while.

I know the are reputedly different, but actually, Fazortan is the first phaser that makes me go "that's it!" since the long discontinued Phaser Model 88, by Sonic Timeworks.

Operational Transconductance Amplifiers, or OTAs, are not the same as op amps. They are more like voltage controlled current sources, see link below for informative info from a former Moog employee. From my recollection, a typical early example CA3080 was not particularly hifi, but was used for musical projects like envelope controller, auto gain control and filter applications. Probably the latter for a phaser.

http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs159/ota3080.html


I tried the demo and it sounds nice btw....

mike_mccue


It models "Operational Transconductance Amplifiers" which is a fancy way of saying "Op-Amp"... which is a fancy way of saying "transfer function"... which is a fancy way of saying "equation"... which is a fancy way of saying it does math.

So it sounds good?

cliffsp8


Operational Transconductance Amplifiers, or OTAs, are not the same as op amps. They are more like voltage controlled current sources, see link below for informative info from a former Moog employee. From my recollection, a typical early example CA3080 was not particularly hifi, but was used for musical projects like envelope controller, auto gain control and filter applications. Probably the latter for a phaser.

http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs159/ota3080.html


I tried the demo and it sounds nice btw....

mike_mccue


It models "Operational Transconductance Amplifiers" which is a fancy way of saying "Op-Amp"... which is a fancy way of saying "transfer function"... which is a fancy way of saying "equation"... which is a fancy way of saying it does math.

So it sounds good?

Thank You!


best regards,
mike

You're welcome  :-)

Scarfed Phoscyon.  A BIG THUMBS UP for Toraverb...and right now it's a steal!!  I use it all the time.  Very deep spacey verbs and textures.  Wowie-wow-wow.