ORIGINAL: What?
the presets were poor, some lacked the proper control adjustment functionality, and others were just useless designed for some esoteric quirky purpose that i would never want.
My experience with Waves plugs is quite the opposite. The presets are usually well though-out and I'm hard-pressed to
think of a control that I would consider "quirky." By some standards, they are rather spartan. There are some reasons why
the Waves plugs have various flavors .. like the Q1, Q4, Q7, Q10, etc. That reason is the Digi TDM hardware. You have to
say how much DSP you're going to use max when you load onto the hardware .. can't change your mind later. So, they came
up with the various incarnations. Other TDM plugs are similar, like McDSP or the Digi EQ III and Dynamics III.
I do agree that there are some plugs (like Voxengo) which are very good and the gap is closing on some of the older
Waves plugs. But, I still reach for the Waves stuff a heck of a lot when mixing.
I think we all have a love/hate relationship with Waves. But, one must consider that without Waves, the transition from
large format consoles to mixing in the box may not have ever occurred; the credibility that tools like Sonar now
garner in the industry is built upon the successes that Waves made possible as an early vanguard in software mixing.
Have they ridden this success a little too long? Yes. But, they've also come out with some absolutely stellar products
as of late in the API, V and SSL plugs .. plus the L3-LL and L3-L16 limiters are very respectable in what they're attempting
to accomplish.
You may not choose to use them, but trashing their plugs as poor quality or ill-conceived makes me question ones credbility
as an audio engineer.