sharke
The trouble with that advice Noel is that it doesn't give anyone any more information by which they can make a rational decision on whether or not to go with a new DAW. People are naturally worried that if for some reason they have to reinstall Sonar in the future, it might happen at a time after which the reactivation servers have been shut down. Ultimately the nightmare scenario would be not being able to load projects and losing work. It doesn't matter how much we're reassured that this will never happen, or how much we're assured that we'll receive some kind of offline key, I think everyone's aware that the current situation is one in which anything could happen at any minute on the whim of Gibson.
Sharke I have a lot of respect for you (as you know I hope based on our past communications) but you are reacting emotionally rather than rationally to this. We clearly said that as and when there was more information it would be presented. Transitioning a company can take a fairly LONG time - it doesn't happen overnight. The fact that there was a transition team of a few people (myself included) obviously means Gibson wants to do something to "transition" the company. So why not wait until such event happens and make up your mind based on facts instead of speculation? I've already said publicly that none of what you indicate as the nightmare scenario would happen since we've already planned for such an escrow situation. Whether I am there or not users wouldn't be left hanging like that. Thats the least we could do to take care of people but I'm sure it will never get to that.
>>Your last paragraph is certainly interesting and is going to get a lot of people talking. Does Noel know something? Is there something on the cards?
If course there is something on the cards - why would there be a transition team if not? But nobody can predict the future including Gibson so there isn't anything to share about timelines or events till it happens.
Crossgrade offers happen all the time and of course companies are going to jump on an event like this. The timing was poor I'll admit but there wasn't anything we could do to change the past.
>>Regarding bugs, I cannot shake off my hunch that something really weird happens to Sonar projects the older and larger they get.
That hunch is incorrect. Most of your bugs were corruption related and caused by weird interactions with plugins. Although large projects can expose such bugs more since more memory is used by the app but its highly unlikely to be related to the actual size of the project. I personally investigated some of them and could never get them to happen. Unfortunately looking through a million lines of code to speculatively fix problems can be a huge time sink. We definitely did put in a lot of time to find them and indeed found and fixed many issues you personally reported. As you say even you could barely repro them yourself - so now imagine what it takes for a developer to try and fix it with no recipe and just using imagination!
I can assure you however that EVERY piece of software I have actively used has mysterious issues like that - some on a much larger scale. And I include Music production software - I wont name names but I've had some bizarre issues in all the Daws I used for testing our plugins. Its all dependent on how you use the app and your workflow whether you see them or not. If everyone saw them they would have been fixed a long time ago.
And to the point Chuckie made about being disappointed that updated info was provided since the announcement: I'm really sorry about that but as much as I believe in transparency, we don't own Cakewalk personally so we have to abide by the process Gibson is following. Anyone who has been through something like this would know that there is a legal process involved. The few remaining folks at Cakewalk who are helping are not even fully briefed on all the details for confidentiality reasons so there isn't much new to share right now.