most compatible waveform editor with x3

Author
moralaural
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2014/05/11 16:39:35
  • Status: offline
2014/05/16 23:21:55 (permalink)

most compatible waveform editor with x3

hiya Im looking for some insight as to the most compatible waveform editor for use with x3 that is both easy to use and not a resource hog. much appreciated. 
#1

9 Replies Related Threads

    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/16 23:38:07 (permalink)
    Compatibility is not an issue. Any wave editor that accepts a wave file as a command line argument can be launched inside SONAR. If I did not have SoundForge 10, I would probably use Wavosaur or Waveshop. But I rarely use an external editor. SONAR is adequate for most of my editing needs.
    #2
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 00:27:11 (permalink)
    What scook said.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #3
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 00:40:46 (permalink)
    Sound Forge works fine.

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #4
    Geo524
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 647
    • Joined: 2010/04/18 00:41:06
    • Location: UpState, NY
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 01:18:12 (permalink)
    Audacity is free and works great.

    Win 10 x 64; CbB; SPlat; MixCraft 8 Pro; AMD FX4130, 3.8 GHz; DDR3 32 GB Ram; Focusrite Scarlett 18i20; SSD 1TB, 2 x 1TB and 1 x 640 GB HDD; Mackie HR624 Monitors, KRK G2 Rockit 5's, Dual HP S2331 23" Monitors
    Music and SFX 
    http://www.radiosparx.com/georgeandmarguerite

     
    #5
    forkol
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 182
    • Joined: 2008/04/12 01:06:19
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 02:39:42 (permalink)
    Soundforge is great, it's what I use most of the time.
     
    However, I also use Edison, which is a VST wave-based editor by ImageLine (folks that make FL studio).
    It allows you to record the output of a track and directly slice and manipulate it, which is useful for re-sampling and creating drum loops.  It seems to work fine for me in Sonar without any issues, but I know some folks have reported issues in other DAWs.
    #6
    AGBFunkyBassman
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 32
    • Joined: 2014/05/08 02:46:36
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 05:46:19 (permalink)
    I understand the value of a separate editor as I've used Sound Forge or Wavelab in the past but the lines between them and most DAW's are a bit blurred now.
     
    Unless there's a particular effect/function that isn't available in native sonar or via a VST it makes sense to me to use the something like Sonar for its non-destructive editing
    #7
    moralaural
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6
    • Joined: 2014/05/11 16:39:35
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 06:50:46 (permalink)
    Thanks for the great suggestions! I have samplitude 6 and sound forge 8 i think the problem comes in with my x3 being 64 bit and both programs being 32 bit, so neither of them open in my 64 bit environment. I also have just switched from protools back to sonar (i had cakewalk) and needed to redraw a wave file and couldn't find a way to do that within x3 and in that search i was led to believe that specific kind of editing could not be done in sonar. Is this true for you guys as well?
    #8
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 09:21:31 (permalink)
    If the program runs stand alone, it will work in SONAR. It does not matter if the editor is 32bit and SONAR is 64bit. The most common mistake when using the instructions for adding an editor is setting the Type to "Wave Editor" instead of "WaveEditor" (the correct entry has no space between Wave and Editor).
     
    I do not believe Samplitude is a wave editor. Generally DAWs do no take a wave file as a command line argument. The ability to accept a wave file as a command line argument is a requirement for integrating the software into SONAR as a WaveEditor type.
    #9
    moralaural
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6
    • Joined: 2014/05/11 16:39:35
    • Status: offline
    Re: most compatible waveform editor with x3 2014/05/17 19:07:20 (permalink)
    Thanks for all the help guys! Finally working now, it apparently didnt like the Sound Forge in the menu text it preferred Audio studio. 
    #10
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1