I've been away for a few days so I missed a number of posts here.
Jeff is spot on with his comments about the bar being extremely high, and the forum NOT being a good place for critical feedback. Most people will tell you a song is good even if it's horribly constructed, lyrics make no sense, singing is pitchy, instruments are out of tune, etc..... all you have to do is read the comments in the songs forum....yeah I get it that people like to be nice, and want to be encouraging and that's all well and good, but if you're shooting for a commercial cut, you have to be honest and most folks listening are not professional song pluggers and don't really know what they are listening for. A few people in the forums have opinions and advice that I trust. Sharp well trained ears. The rest.... I love them anyway and appreciate their comments as well, it's just that they don't dig deep with their comments. Hey, we're all having fun..., right?
Yeah, in recent years the trend is for simple, sparse music. Lots of TV shows are using it as well as commercials.
Most of the guys and gals I know who are in the top libraries are not giving up the names of the libraries or the folks involved. Those names and contacts were generally very hard won. More than one time other folks not quite as professional or ready to be playing at that level have contacted the producers and presidents and used the names of those folks, saying essentially that "so and so recommended that I contact you" which creates an awkward situation for the guy there legitimately. Once bitten, twice shy......Once you get there on your own, other people get to know and then it's OK to discuss the names once you're all on the same side of the gates. One A-class I'll tell you about is Studio 51. they only take referrals from TAXI....I've seen the owner post in the forum on TAXI......Do you want in? They land big cuts for their writers. Very exclusive bunch. You gotta submit through TAXI, and TAXI isn't telling you either what the name of the library is before you submit, or after you submit unless you get a forward to the listing, and even then..... I've had forwards to "Major TV Library"..... as opposed to a specific name of the library. That's by the library's request.....lots of secrecy in some of the bigger places. Whether that is good or bad, right or wrong, IDK..... but that's what I've seen. And yeah, some of the libraries I'm in took a lot of time and effort to get there..... I'm not willing to tell that info to anyone .... you need to earn it yourself. You'll value it more that way. I share the info rarely and only when I;m sure the person is capable and ready..... just do me a favor and don't mention my name. (just in case you blow it)
Of course there are lots of B-class libraries that are online and accept on line from anyone.... those are no big problem. Pump Audio is one of them. Crucial is another. Crucial has tough screeners. The better libraries tend to not advertise or accept unsolicited material form unknown writers. You get one shot with a recommendation. On those, I'm not giving up those names nor are anyone else I know who's in them.
As far as my last year at TAXI being a rip off, I disagree. As Jeff mentioned, while I submitted good songs, they were not good enough for any of a variety of reasons. Could have been the lyrics didn't work for the listing, the style was not close enough, the recording had quality issues, or anything else that the screener heard that I didn't.
I had one song a number of years back that the screener commented that the lyrics were dead on target, but the style wasn't close enough..... returned. Rock ballad, not indy rock enough....go figure.
The good thing is, there is no "one way" to success in this business. There are literally hundreds of ways to get your music into the hands of the movers and shakers. The key to success is to keep at it. You never succeed when you give up or slow down. Even the B-libraries can land you a lucrative TV deal. So keep working on the dream.
post edited by Guitarhacker - 2014/02/13 23:04:50