nvidia or AMD?

Author
jbraner
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1830
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:38:35
  • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
  • Status: offline
2016/02/04 11:17:30 (permalink)

nvidia or AMD?

Hi,
 
I'm currently using the Intel graphics adapter (HD4000) that's built in ti the i7 3770k chip - andit's fine.
 
If (when) I upgrade my motherboard, if I have to get a PCIe graphics card - is there a consensus whether it's better to get a nvidia or AMD graphics adapter? Or does it just depend on the individual adapter whetehr it will be trouble free (re: low latency etc)?
 
This will be with Windows 10 x64 if that counts for anything.
 
Thanks for any ideas... 

John Braner
https://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/JohnBraner
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
 
- Intel i7 3770K 3.5GHz
- Windows 10 Pro - 64 bit
- Cakewalk by BandLab x64
- Reaper x64
- 16GB RAM
- Asus P8z77-V mobo - using the integrated Intel graphic card (HD4000)
- MOTU Ultralite AVB audio interface
I usually use ASIO set at 64 or 128 samples
er - that's it I think...
#1

15 Replies Related Threads

    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 11:30:15 (permalink)
    If you're just doing straight up audio production, onboard Intel HD video is fine.
    If you need more specific features, let those determine the video card.
    ie: If you want hardware acceleration for video editing, I'd go with a Nvidia GTX card.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #2
    jbraner
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1830
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:38:35
    • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 11:39:02 (permalink)
    Hi Jim,
     
    I just meant, what's recommended if the Intel chips don't have onboard video anymore? (I'm not sure if they do or not - I haven't done any research yet...)
    post edited by jbraner - 2016/02/04 11:52:22

    John Braner
    https://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/JohnBraner
    http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
     
    - Intel i7 3770K 3.5GHz
    - Windows 10 Pro - 64 bit
    - Cakewalk by BandLab x64
    - Reaper x64
    - 16GB RAM
    - Asus P8z77-V mobo - using the integrated Intel graphic card (HD4000)
    - MOTU Ultralite AVB audio interface
    I usually use ASIO set at 64 or 128 samples
    er - that's it I think...
    #3
    TerraSin
    Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1975
    • Joined: 2005/08/05 00:27:13
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 11:46:49 (permalink)
    Your chip will run 3 monitors at 2560x1440 @ 60 Hz
    No need for a graphics card
    post edited by TerraSin - 2016/02/04 12:03:14
    #4
    jbraner
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1830
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:38:35
    • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 12:47:36 (permalink)
    Thanks Terra,

    I was thinking about what to do with an update. If the new Intel chips still have graphics adapters in them (I haven't checked) I'll be all set. If not, I'll have to get one.

    John Braner
    https://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/JohnBraner
    http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
     
    - Intel i7 3770K 3.5GHz
    - Windows 10 Pro - 64 bit
    - Cakewalk by BandLab x64
    - Reaper x64
    - 16GB RAM
    - Asus P8z77-V mobo - using the integrated Intel graphic card (HD4000)
    - MOTU Ultralite AVB audio interface
    I usually use ASIO set at 64 or 128 samples
    er - that's it I think...
    #5
    Wookiee
    Rrrrugh arah-ah-woof?
    • Total Posts : 13306
    • Joined: 2007/01/16 06:19:43
    • Location: Akahaocwora - Village Yoh Kay
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 13:52:57 (permalink)
    Most MoB's have on board graphics chips these days and many can support up to three monitors 1 analogue the others digital.  As noted above it really depends on what else you might do with the computer.  I would avoid the gaming ones as they tend to have fans which will result in noise.

    Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain.
    Karma has a way of finding its own way home.
    Primary, i7 8700K 16Gigs Ram, 3x500gb SSD's 2TB Backup HHD Saffire Pro 40. Win 10 64Bit
    Secondary  i7 4790K, 32GB Ram, 500Gb SSD OS/Prog's, 1TB Audio, 1TB Samples HHD AudioBox USB, Win 10 64Bit
    CbB, Adam's A7x's - Event 20/20's, Arturia V6, Korg Digital Legacy, Softube Modular, Arturia Keylab-88, USB-MidiSport 8x8 
    #6
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 14:31:00 (permalink)
    I just picked up a silent nvidia 1 gig card for $49 CDN. IT's for a media PC I cobbled together on a budget. I've used cards from both manufacturers over the years. I liked the nvidia for gaming but find the AMD cards to run very cool and quiet. My HD 7950 is a power house but makes virtually no noise from the 2 fans it has. You have a bunch of options.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #7
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 14:33:46 (permalink)
    Socket 2011-3 CPUs don't have onboard graphics.
    If you need a simple/quiet video card, HD5450 can be found passive-cooled and they're inexpensive.
     
    Socket 1150 (HD-4600) and 1151 (HD-530) CPUs have onboard GPUs.
    To clarify: The video ports are on the motherboard, but the GPU is on the CPU.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #8
    DrLumen
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 621
    • Joined: 2005/07/05 20:11:34
    • Location: North Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 14:43:27 (permalink)
    I prefer Nvidia simply because of all the incredible, unnecessary and absolute pains I have had trying to update AMD drivers over the years.

    -When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

    Sonar Platinum / Intel i7-4790K / AsRock Z97 / 32GB RAM / Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB / Behringer FCA610 / M-Audio Sport 2x4 / Win7 x64 Pro / WDC Black HDD's / EVO 850 SSD's / Alesis Q88 / Boss DS-330 / Korg nanoKontrol / Novation Launch Control / 14.5" Lava Lamp
    #9
    TerraSin
    Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1975
    • Joined: 2005/08/05 00:27:13
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 15:15:16 (permalink)
    DrLumen
    I prefer Nvidia simply because of all the incredible, unnecessary and absolute pains I have had trying to update AMD drivers over the years.

    Having recently bought an AMD because of the DX12 issue after using Intel for years, you're absolutely correct. I actually very much regret buying this videocard.
    #10
    jbraner
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1830
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:38:35
    • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/04 16:44:58 (permalink)
    Thanks very much for these replies. I'll definitely try to get something with on-board graphics then, and if not, I'll avoid AMD...

    John Braner
    https://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/JohnBraner
    http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
     
    - Intel i7 3770K 3.5GHz
    - Windows 10 Pro - 64 bit
    - Cakewalk by BandLab x64
    - Reaper x64
    - 16GB RAM
    - Asus P8z77-V mobo - using the integrated Intel graphic card (HD4000)
    - MOTU Ultralite AVB audio interface
    I usually use ASIO set at 64 or 128 samples
    er - that's it I think...
    #11
    Maarkr
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 488
    • Joined: 2011/12/10 09:35:33
    • Location: Maine
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/05 22:22:21 (permalink)
    i got an NVidia card 2 yrs ago after firckin w Radeon issues for months. Been happy with it.

    Maarkr
    Studio: SPALT Lifetime/BL Cakewalk, Studio One 3.5, UAD, Z3ta+2, IKM, NI, Waves, iZotope, Melda, Reaper
    i7 3770/Giga Z77 mobo, Win10 Pro-64 w16Gb, MOTU Ultralite MK4, Yamaha HS80M wSub, Live: PX-5S, FA-06, Roland Lucina, Epi Les Paul, Ibanez Bass, Amps, e-drums, Zoom R-16...
    Latest album release, NEW! Counry Classic at http://genemaarkr.bandcamp.com/
    #12
    ston
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 965
    • Joined: 2008/03/04 12:28:40
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/08 11:56:02 (permalink)
    Do you mean ATI rather than AMD?
     
    Anyway, despite being an ATI advocate for many years, I've moved to Nvidia (since a few years back now).  Ditto the Intel/AMD CPU wars; I've gone from AMD/ATI systems to Intel/Nvidia ones.  I think Intel and Nvidia have both won their respective battles.
     
    If you just need gfx for running DAW software, then the on-motherboard graphics will do just fine, it's not a very graphically intensive application at all.
    #13
    jbraner
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1830
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:38:35
    • Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/08 13:32:15 (permalink)
    Yeah, I do mean ATI - but AMD took them over
    http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics
     
    I wasn't sure if the onboard graphics were still around (on new mobos), or if that was a "one off" thing around Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge CPUs. As long as there are still onboard graphics - that seeems the easiest route to take.
     
    I'm also getting the picture tha nvidia makes the most sense if I have to get a graphics card. I know I've seen posts re: graphics card probs with SONAR (cracks and pops etc) - but I hadn't paid attention to what was causing them...

    John Braner
    https://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/JohnBraner
    http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
     
    - Intel i7 3770K 3.5GHz
    - Windows 10 Pro - 64 bit
    - Cakewalk by BandLab x64
    - Reaper x64
    - 16GB RAM
    - Asus P8z77-V mobo - using the integrated Intel graphic card (HD4000)
    - MOTU Ultralite AVB audio interface
    I usually use ASIO set at 64 or 128 samples
    er - that's it I think...
    #14
    DrLumen
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 621
    • Joined: 2005/07/05 20:11:34
    • Location: North Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/08 17:48:07 (permalink)
    ston
    Do you mean ATI rather than AMD?
     
    Anyway, despite being an ATI advocate for many years, I've moved to Nvidia (since a few years back now).  Ditto the Intel/AMD CPU wars; I've gone from AMD/ATI systems to Intel/Nvidia ones.  I think Intel and Nvidia have both won their respective battles.
     
    If you just need gfx for running DAW software, then the on-motherboard graphics will do just fine, it's not a very graphically intensive application at all.




    Yes, technically ATI. But as John said, AMD bought them out some years ago so I think of them as AMD (perhaps incorrectly).

    -When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

    Sonar Platinum / Intel i7-4790K / AsRock Z97 / 32GB RAM / Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB / Behringer FCA610 / M-Audio Sport 2x4 / Win7 x64 Pro / WDC Black HDD's / EVO 850 SSD's / Alesis Q88 / Boss DS-330 / Korg nanoKontrol / Novation Launch Control / 14.5" Lava Lamp
    #15
    ston
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 965
    • Joined: 2008/03/04 12:28:40
    • Status: offline
    Re: nvidia or AMD? 2016/02/09 07:55:40 (permalink)
    Ah right, I did not realise they'd been bought out!  Must've been a few years ago now that I switched to Nvidia... ;-)
    #16
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1