problems or running great??

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 19:04:50 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: droddey

What you have said makes a lot of sense to me. Does this perhaps explain why TDM plugs are so expensive comparatively speaking, ie: they are much more strenuously tested before Digi will allow them to run on their app?


I would imagine so, since they are targeting the professional market, and are targeting a single platform, where the native versions run on lots of DAWs and no one can really test thoroughly on them all. And they are making enough money on them (in this very limited market) to justify heavy testing. Also, the TDM plugs split the plugs in half and only the interface runs on the host OS, with the processing parts running in the much more constrained and simple DSP board environment.



I instinctively know that you are right and I suspect what we have here now is a case where a product is trying to be way too many things to way too many people. I have never really used any plugs that where not put out by highly respected and trusted developers such as EW and GPO (which of course uses Native Instruments players), RealGuitar, UAD and a few of the plugs that Cakewalk provides. With the thousands of users of those products, I would have thought that any catastropic bugs would have been uncovered and resolved.

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#31
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 20:04:46 (permalink)
You would think so but it's not the case, definitely. I'm a software engineer, and I've probably written almost as much code as everyone at those companies combined, and I can tell you that the most incredible bugs can go uncaught for seemingly impossible lengths of time until the right set of circumstances come up. And of course many people just shrug (or scream) and restart the program and you never hear anything about it until you are the one that gets whacked. Even if they reported it, the possibility of really figuring out whose fault it is is very low, because it will only probably occur with exactly the configuration you happen to have at the moment of plugs in that order with those tracks and even added in that order over time. So you would have to basically ship the entire thing to Cakewalk and have them diagnose it, after they purchsed all the plugs and licenses and all that, and they wouldn't have the source code of the plugs so they couldn't see what they are doing anyway. So these things just tend not to even get diagnosed due to the difficulty of doing so.

And you should not assume that those companies you mention don't have plenty of bugs in their stuff. Particularly with the kidn of coding required by plugins, it would be so easy to screw up and so hard to test. Plenty of them probably have lots of assembler code in them, or very low level buffer fiddling. And they probably don't test their stuff in conjunction with lots of other plugs, so they don't see the bugs themselves and assume they are OK.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#32
APC3
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1228
  • Joined: 2006/04/11 22:06:57
  • Location: Michigan
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 20:16:49 (permalink)
knock on wood, totally problem free, besides user errors on Sonar HS4XL, Sonar 5, and 6(7 soon). It's funny, I have a Line6 TonePort and frequent their forum over there, and so many people refuse to accept the fact that they have to tweak their system, especially when a little under powered. They get so upset because it's not plug and record. no such thing IMO. Then they ask what a DAW and a Sequencer are, so I kinda feel for them and do try to help, but you can only help yourself.
#33
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 20:30:55 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: droddey

You would think so but it's not the case, definitely. I'm a software engineer, and I've probably written almost as much code as everyone at those companies combined, and I can tell you that the most incredible bugs can go uncaught for seemingly impossible lengths of time until the right set of circumstances come up. And of course many people just shrug (or scream) and restart the program and you never hear anything about it until you are the one that gets whacked. Even if they reported it, the possibility of really figuring out whose fault it is is very low, because it will only probably occur with exactly the configuration you happen to have at the moment of plugs in that order with those tracks and even added in that order over time. So you would have to basically ship the entire thing to Cakewalk and have them diagnose it, after they purchsed all the plugs and licenses and all that, and they wouldn't have the source code of the plugs so they couldn't see what they are doing anyway. So these things just tend not to even get diagnosed due to the difficulty of doing so.

And you should not assume that those companies you mention don't have plenty of bugs in their stuff. Particularly with the kidn of coding required by plugins, it would be so easy to screw up and so hard to test. Plenty of them probably have lots of assembler code in them, or very low level buffer fiddling. And they probably don't test their stuff in conjunction with lots of other plugs, so they don't see the bugs themselves and assume they are OK.



Thanks for your time and technical information.

Yeah, I had bought a Muse Receptor a couple of years ago as a test hoping to get nearly all of the sample libraries out of the DAW. It was a rather expensive lesson. If it would have worked out as I hoped, I would have bought several more. But it sets in the rack mostly unused. Only thing on it is Colossus and whatever free plugs that comes with it. Shoot in 2 years, Muse hasn't even been able to get RealGuitar to run on it. I suppose it's time to look into a networked system of several computers and just get everything off the DAW once and for all.

I do find it amazing when I do the initial transfers from tape into Sonar to see Sonar run 15 or more audio tracks using very little horsepower without much incident. Then as I start inserting instances of the the orchestral parts and continue work over a few days, I witness the entire production slowly fall apart, become nearly unplayable and more and more corrupt.

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#34
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 20:52:50 (permalink)
do find it amazing when I do the initial transfers from tape into Sonar to see Sonar run 15 or more audio tracks using very little horsepower without much incident. Then as I start inserting instances of the the orchestral parts and continue work over a few days, I witness the entire production slowly fall apart, become nearly unplayable and more and more corrupt.


Then it's likely that the plugins you are using have some sort of issue.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#35
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 21:03:17 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: droddey

do find it amazing when I do the initial transfers from tape into Sonar to see Sonar run 15 or more audio tracks using very little horsepower without much incident. Then as I start inserting instances of the the orchestral parts and continue work over a few days, I witness the entire production slowly fall apart, become nearly unplayable and more and more corrupt.


Then it's likely that the plugins you are using have some sort of issue.



Yeper. Maybe. But dang, what to do? Throw away thousands of $ invested in libraries ? Not a good solution.
post edited by pianodano - 2007/11/26 21:15:08

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#36
robby
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5819
  • Joined: 2006/05/13 15:53:45
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 21:08:57 (permalink)
"This is getting silly now and your post is kind of in the vein of the GURU on this very forum that told me a few years back that if you ain't a computer engineer, you gotta expect problems. "

What may work best for you is one of those all in one units? Boss makes a good one?
#37
holderofthehorns
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 679
  • Joined: 2005/10/01 15:21:56
  • Location: Marion, OH
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/26 21:16:49 (permalink)
Looks to me like the computer engineer is having problems, too.


Eric Anderson
HolderOfTheHorns - It's a Viking thing.
#38
kwgm
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2271
  • Joined: 2006/10/12 00:14:20
  • Status: offline
RE: problems or running great?? 2007/11/27 12:11:27 (permalink)
No Problems.


--kwgm
#39
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1