﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>problems with boost 64</title><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashx</link><description /><copyright>(c) Cakewalk Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (smoochy)</title><description> aperenyly there is a bug in the machine.&amp;nbsp; talked to the tecks they said to run the 32 bit instead of the 64.&amp;nbsp; tried it and havn't had a problem since... something to do with vista ultimate.&amp;nbsp; also i was having a problem with my liniar eq...&amp;nbsp; locking up the program and shutting it down... they said it was a known problem and a fix would be out toward the end of the month.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; but&amp;nbsp; so far no fix for the boost 64&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1868246</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:51:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (Zo)</title><description> i keep the same&amp;nbsp; , i ain't going to low even if can ...it really depends on what' you're doing , the only recordin i make is when i record vocals (usin direct monitoring so no latencie issues) but for exemple if you're a guitar or live drummer with plugins sounds , low latencie is appreciated , now with the "bypass all racks of this sort" you can bypass all fx , record and then enable them ....cause you have the latenie of the audio soundcard and latencie created by some plugin (ex : transient shaper witch introduce crazy latencies !!)&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860639</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:50:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (smoochy)</title><description> we'll find out... talked to techs... the problem seems to be a little deeper he's going to get back to me about it....&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; in the mean time i am trying to fool around with latency settings.&amp;nbsp; tell me, do you decrease your latency wile recording and then increase when playing back or pretty much keep it the same?&amp;nbsp; or is it more a project dependency adjustment?&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860631</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (Zo)</title><description> DOES &lt;b&gt;INCREASIN YOUR LATENCY SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM ?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860568</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:32:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (smoochy)</title><description> using 64bit....&amp;nbsp; i also forgot to mention that I'm also getting a fair amount of glitching during playback.&amp;nbsp; the project tends to studder once or twice each time i play it from beginning to end.&amp;nbsp; never in the same spot.&amp;nbsp; the activity monitor for the CPU with like twenty tracks only reads about 20%&amp;nbsp; so it doesn't appear to be a overloading problem?&amp;nbsp; with the demo song called guilty by unified tribe which is like 40 tracks playing back the CPU activity is only at about 35%.&amp;nbsp; the computer is dedicated to sonar.&amp;nbsp; i don't have any other programs on it other than sonar.&amp;nbsp; I've disabled the on board sound card in the bias and i only use the internet for updating windows and sonar and always disable the internet and all the security features wile using sonar.&amp;nbsp; do i need to adjust settings in my bias to allow more dedication to sonar?&amp;nbsp; I'm getting a little frustrated.&amp;nbsp; I'm using only the best gear... no cheap stuff.&amp;nbsp; i read that stuffing the synth rack to much will cause problems but like i said i never even come close to using up the CPU power.&amp;nbsp; plus this happens even on a stereo master project running nothing but a sterio audio track with a few mastering plug ins&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; v studio&lt;br&gt; sonar pro 8.5 64 bit&lt;br&gt; asus p6t delux mother board&lt;br&gt; ocz platnum ddr3 ram&amp;nbsp; 12 gig&lt;br&gt; intel&amp;nbsp; i7-920 chip&lt;br&gt; 1,000 watt hi end power supply&lt;br&gt; 1 tb sata hard drive&lt;br&gt; ati radeon series 4800 graphics card&amp;nbsp; pcie&lt;br&gt; 2- sata dvd drives&lt;br&gt; all power&amp;nbsp; for the stuieo setup is through top of the line furman power conditioners running on it's own dedicated circuit&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860538</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:34:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:problems with boost 64 (Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk])</title><description> Are you using SONAR 32-bit or SONAR 64-bit?&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860403</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:38:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>problems with boost 64 (smoochy)</title><description> i seem to be having problems with the boost64 plug in...&amp;nbsp; when ever i insert it it works fine but if i attempt to change the other plug ins the audio drops out...&amp;nbsp; the meters pin on the boost64 but all the other meters indicate normally but no sound...it only corrects it's self when i close the project and reopen it.&amp;nbsp; i thought it was a matter of too many plug ins but when i attempted to do a master two track using only the stereo track with the linear eq, the vintage compressor and the boost (regular mastering chain) it continues to happen.&amp;nbsp; i never experienced this problem prior to 8.5.&amp;nbsp; i'm not sure if it's a driver conflict or a software glitch with the boost plug in&amp;nbsp; or what?&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; i also recently upped my ram to 12 gig...could this be an issue?&lt;br&gt; running an assus p6tdelux with an i7 920&lt;br&gt; using vista 64 ultimate&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1860389.ashxFindPost/1860389</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:27:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>