﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal</title><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashx</link><description /><copyright>(c) Cakewalk Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal (Audiomax)</title><description> For what it's worth I tried usb, took it back and told then to give me something that worked....ended up going with pcie and&amp;nbsp;couldn't be happier. Maybe current USB is better&amp;nbsp;but when I tried it it&amp;nbsp;was crap. &lt;br&gt;     &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;     What's wrong with what you've got anyway? It's got&amp;nbsp;canon inputs, word clock, spdif in/out, 24/96, switchable input level....pro specs&amp;nbsp;as far as&amp;nbsp;I can see. If the drivers are ok you can't go wrong getting a decent preamp with&amp;nbsp;phantom power&amp;nbsp;and running&amp;nbsp;in balanced. &lt;br&gt;     Another&amp;nbsp;option is to go for a DA converter like the Apogee Mini Me and&amp;nbsp;go&amp;nbsp;direct digital&amp;nbsp;in via spdif bypassing you cards A/D converters, less jitter and cleaner signal. Depends on how many inputs you need at the same time though, you'll think you actually did get a new sound card. The Behringer SRC2496 is a good value converter for the money too but no phantom power.&lt;br&gt;     &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;     Cheers,&lt;br&gt;     Max.&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashxFindPost/1878400</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:11:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal (Resonant Order)</title><description> What you have is equal, or better, than the usb devices that cakewalk sells. Unless you're willing to shell out for RME/Lynx/Lavry, you won't see a difference. A PCI or PCIe slot works fundamentally different than a USB or firewire connection. In my experience, you will get lower latency using something other than usb or firewire.&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashxFindPost/1878360</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:45:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal (Sickvision)</title><description> what do you think is a good preamp. do you think the cakewalk ones ther pushing are good externals&lt;br&gt;     im short on cash and i have 3 internal card but the 0404 emu and delta are the same i have a external 0202box i use for my laptop but i didnt think it would be good enought ,or if i could use ASAO driversem 0202 but no phantom power</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashxFindPost/1878348</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:34:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal (bitflipper)</title><description> All things being equal, an internal card should be capable of lower latency than a serial-connected device. In practice, however, the difference will probably not be enough that you'd notice.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; If you're considering upgrading your interface, do it for more features and better preamps. And plan to spend significantly more than what you paid for your Delta.&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashxFindPost/1878336</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>i was told by cakewalk guythe usb audio capture devise whould work as good as internal (Sickvision)</title><description> i love my delta with the ten inputs'''' but will a external device with phantom power and preamps be better???&lt;br&gt;     does the usb make a change in latincy. is external as good as internal card&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m1878319.ashxFindPost/1878319</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:14:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>