﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST?</title><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashx</link><description /><copyright>(c) Cakewalk Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST? (bapu)</title><description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;mike_mccue&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I'm hoping to find for something like the classic Waves De-esser but I'd like it to be the old Waves VST. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I am hoping to learn of a discreet VST like that Waves De-esser... I don't want anything buried in a channel strip. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; 32 and 64 bit would be great. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; best regards, &lt;br&gt; mike &lt;br&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt; If you get a de-esser will you be then known as McSivvvle?   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashxFindPost/2378988</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:58:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST? (bitflipper)</title><description> Spitfish works pretty well. The only complaint I've had about it is that the sensitivity sometimes can't be turned up high enough for quiet tracks. Still, it's what I reach for first because of its CPU-friendliness. That is, when I use a de-esser at all, which is rarely.&lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashxFindPost/2378977</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:45:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST? (The Maillard Reaction)</title><description> &lt;br&gt; The controls in the Sonnox are very appealing... the iLok is a deal killer.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; That's why I will not buy my own Waves version.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Spitfish is nice... I'd like to pay for more control.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; KVR doesn't have many others listed.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; There is a Universal Audio version but you need their card and the UI for that Desser isn't the type I want either.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Thank You.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I am hoping there might be something still out there.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; best regards,&lt;br&gt; mike&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashxFindPost/2378955</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST? (Rain)</title><description> Did you ever try the free Spitfish, by Digitalfishphones? Hasn't been updated in a while I believe so there probablly isn't a 64 bit version. I used to use their plug-ins quite a bit on the pc.    &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; A quick search on Google leads me to believe that a DeEsser must be the one plug-in people don't want to pay for - all the links are for free plugs. :s  &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; If you have an iLock, maybe you can try Sonnox' SuprEsser. Don't know how light it is though. &lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashxFindPost/2378944</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:03:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Looking for a really effective really light weight dedicated DeEsser VST? (The Maillard Reaction)</title><description> &lt;br&gt; I'm hoping to find for something like the classic Waves De-esser but I'd like it to be the old Waves VST.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I am hoping to learn of a discreet VST like that Waves De-esser... I don't want anything buried in a channel strip.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; 32 and 64 bit would be great.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; best regards,&lt;br&gt; mike&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description><link>http://forum.cakewalk.com/rss-m2378858.ashxFindPost/2378858</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:44:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>