doncolga
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1519
- Joined: 2006/01/03 17:15:48
- Location: Statesboro, GA USA
- Status: offline
Live Performance Set List Control
Hey, I REALLY like what I've seen so far. Here are a few questions: 1. What type of song cuing control will we have while performing? Will we be able to make set lists and deviate easily from those when necessary? 2. Also, what's the highest capacity for an SD card that can be used? I see up to 32 GB for $90 3. I notice in the performance part of the videos it looks like he's controlling the left and right channels separately...is there any way for one knob to control the stereo track? 4. Can effects be changed via my MIDI keyboard while playing live? I usually like really short delays or reverbs on fast songs and long reverbs or delays on slow tunes. That would be AWSOME. The compressor is awsome too. 5. I also notice the guy has a notebook as well as the VS-100...we can gig with just the VS-100 right? I'd prefer to not bring my notebook. For what it's worth, here's what I would LOVE *some* product to do: A keyboard or other device with a nice large touch interface display that would let me: 1. Call up any of my songs really quickly or follow a set list. 2. Trigger any part of the song from the screen using a meaningful name like bridge, intro, chorus, etc, making an arrangement that would run as long or short as I want. 3. While the song is playing, be able to mute any part that I want. I know 2-3 are right up Ableton Live's alley, but why should they be the only with that ability? Donny
post edited by doncolga - 2009/04/03 22:33:43
HP Z220 Workstation I7 3770, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10, Sonar Platinum, RME Multiface II via PCIe, JBL 4326 w/sub, AvanTone MixCubes
|
Pastorbelvedere
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 114
- Joined: 2007/10/15 22:24:22
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/04/05 23:08:13
(permalink)
For what it's worth, here's what I would LOVE *some* product to do: A keyboard or other device with a nice large touch interface display that would let me: 1. Call up any of my songs really quickly or follow a set list. 2. Trigger any part of the song from the screen using a meaningful name like bridge, intro, chorus, etc, making an arrangement that would run as long or short as I want. 3. While the song is playing, be able to mute any part that I want. +1 Thats EXACTLY what I'm looking for, if it does this,(and i know it doesn't) I'm in. Pastorbelvedere
|
doncolga
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1519
- Joined: 2006/01/03 17:15:48
- Location: Statesboro, GA USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/04/10 08:58:22
(permalink)
Can you call up one song while playing another?
HP Z220 Workstation I7 3770, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10, Sonar Platinum, RME Multiface II via PCIe, JBL 4326 w/sub, AvanTone MixCubes
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/04/17 17:43:41
(permalink)
I have to agree, and add the ability to mix a click track to the headphone out (as well as a desired level of the backing tracks) for live drummers to follow. From what I've seen here, I'm not alone in needing a more flexible, durable, portable live rig for doing backing tracks to a live set. The alternative seems to be using a cd with click in one channel, but that limits the FOH output to a mono track only (the cd channel without the click mixed in). I know bands that are nursing along old sony mini-disk systems as their live rigs because there's not much out there to address this need. There's a korg 8 track that comes close (8 discrete outs from hard disk), but you still would need an external mixer to get stereo FOH and a click into the headphone mix only. Most of the other "all in ones" are stereo out only, with no click to the headphones. What gets sent to the FOH gets sent to the cans. Being able to set up set lists in sonar to download to a solid-state stage rig could be ideal, and perhaps get sonar/roland into a larger market share in specific segments (touring acts with backing tracks) and perhaps consequently into their project studios as well. With gigs getting harder to land in this economy, more and more artists may be faced with downsizing to keep working. The need for a live backing track rig will probably be around for a long time.
|
doncolga
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1519
- Joined: 2006/01/03 17:15:48
- Location: Statesboro, GA USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/04/17 18:33:30
(permalink)
I'm working with Ableton Live 7 to address some things I'd like to do performing, but it's a little daunting. If this works the way I'd like, I'd probably add an 8 channel USB interface with 8 outs in my rack so my mix would arrive at the console in 4 stereo stems that I could adjust manually if needed. This could also easily account for a click for a drummer to follow. My frustration is that I'd rather not use two DAWs, plus I'd be looking at building my playlist up again in Ableton. Not necessarily a bad thing, but a little time consuming.
post edited by doncolga - 2009/04/17 18:45:45
HP Z220 Workstation I7 3770, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10, Sonar Platinum, RME Multiface II via PCIe, JBL 4326 w/sub, AvanTone MixCubes
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/05/02 12:55:24
(permalink)
Ok, looking carefully at the "live preformance" example video, I think we may be out of luck as far as using the VS100 for live tracks with click (assuming stereo feed to FOH mains). Admittedly this is all based on very limited information. The example in the video shows the backing tracks being rendered in sonar (like export audio) and then copied to the non-volitile memory in the VS100. This to me appears to be an audio-only copy exercise. I don't think what ends up on the VS100 is anything like a stripped-down project file, which would include tempo data that could program the internal click from the VS100 during playback on stage. If the drummer can't pick up the tempo via a headphone mix (with click) not many will find this unit useful for live backing tracks. Nice try though. (Will have to wait until the manual is posted to confirm this for sure.) Aligning the internal click (if it's available at all during playback) to audio-only tracks (after the tranferring the mix down) could be a real hassel, and to do that for an entire set of tunes would be insurmaountable. Don't feel too bad, no one else in the industry is really filling this void either. This kind of puts me back looking at the Korg D888. Not an ideal solution either, since to do what I need, I will have to record two sync'd mixes of the backing tracks (one with click for the drummer, and one without for front of house).
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/05 19:07:46
(permalink)
Ok, now that the manual is available on-line, I think I can confirm that my previous observations were correct. The block diagram shows the internal mentronome is routed to the main mix only which parallels the headphone output. This means that the other line outputs are sourced from the PC only and could not provide the FOH mix without click from the internal wave recorder memory chip. (It's not obvious from the manual if the internal metronome would be available during playback in the first place.) In summary, the V Studio 100 (by itself) is probably not the ideal rig for syncing your drummer to backing tracks during a live performance (especially if you need a stereo FOH mix). But then again, what is the ideal tool for this purpose? Seems like someone is missing a market opportunity that is unmet at the moment.
|
xen
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2009/06/05 15:41:35
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/06 05:15:31
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: feedback50 I have to agree, and add the ability to mix a click track to the headphone out (as well as a desired level of the backing tracks) for live drummers to follow. Remember WAV is a multi-channel format - but whether the VS-100 supports multi-channel WAVs is another matter. If it does support them, you could maybe create a multichannel WAV with tracks 1 & 2 as the backing mix, and track 3 as the click, and use the mixer to route them to different outputs in different amounts...
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/06 15:46:27
(permalink)
If the block diagram is accurate, they only show two channels from the on board memory going directly to the channels feeding the master bus only. The other channels can be fed only from the USB interface from a PC.
|
xen
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2009/06/05 15:41:35
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/07 06:48:19
(permalink)
That's a shame. It would have been an elegant solution if it worked... Still, if your reason for wanting 2 channels of backing is to make the FOH feed "stereo", then I would question the need for this. Most of the audience won't hear it in stereo - and as I'm sure you know if you use too much stereo, they'll hear an unbalanced mix depending where they are. The practice of using a mono backing track plus click (i.e. a stereo file, consisting of the mono backing track in one channel and a backing-with-click in the other channel) seems to be well-established according to this and this. A more legitimate reason for needing more channels in the backing track would be to give the FOH mixer separate stems so they can get a better mix. But then you probably need more than two channels of backing. As I said, for a solid-state device, multi-channel WAVs would be a simple way to achieve all of this (this is more aimed at Cakewalk... a firmware revision?)...
post edited by xen - 2009/06/07 07:52:04
|
voyageraustralia
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 25
- Joined: 2007/07/08 08:41:02
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/07 23:29:39
(permalink)
This discussion has answered my post in a previous thread... I think stereo backing is favourable in most environments, unless you're very careful in your mono mix to make sure your instruments don't sound like crap when played in mono. Looks like the D888 has that "stereo FOH" advantage then, but I still tend towards buying the V100 because it's MUCH smaller and also acts as an interface.... AARGH.. I thought this thing would solve all my live backing problems. At the moment we use a DJ setup (DENON s1200D + mixer), split L/R, which works well (especially in terms of setlists etc), but it's bulky and looks weird in a rock band environment!
EDIROL FA-66, SONAR 8, REASON 4, KORG M50 (endorsed), KORG TRITON, LEXICON MX300, DBX 376, NOVATION XIOSYNTH
|
xen
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2009/06/05 15:41:35
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/06/08 13:24:29
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: voyageraustralia I think stereo backing is favourable in most environments, unless you're very careful in your mono mix to make sure your instruments don't sound like crap when played in mono. Well I think you need to be careful to check it in mono anyway, as most of the audience will probably hear it in mono anyway because of where they're standing, even if you deliver it in stereo.
|
Dark Bard
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4
- Joined: 2008/06/04 16:57:26
- Status: offline
RE: Live Performance Set List Control
2009/09/19 11:47:49
(permalink)
Having employed almost all of the items mentioned in live playback scenarios, let me state that Sonar's song list feature does allow quick change up of set lists on the fly. It also pulls up whatever soft synths and effects you have associated with a project when that song loads. Graduating up from Sony Minidiscs used some 10 years ago, I've used the Korg D888 for 3 years as my main tracks playback device in one project. It's fantastic in that, since it has 8 discrete outs, The drummer (playback track operator) can monitor his own electronic kit (stereo pr) and vocal mic along with the stereo playback track and click all using the D888s 8 channels as his personal dedicated mixer. His fader moves don't affect what's sent to FOH. It works like a charm. In another project I've used Sonar in song list mode for almost 3 years playing stereo mixes of songs I recorded in Sonar. The soft synths load like a champ between songs. The lyric "teleprompter" is a fantastic bonus, as well! That merely requires adding in a (muted) midi track of song melody and affix the lyrics to it. The lyric window opens and updates with each new song that loads from the song list. It's rock solid and I've done national tours using this system. If Cakewalk would only fix the video projection bug I've been whining about for two years! Sonar also has ability to load synced video (ideal for projection) on second monitor, also used as projector send. The thing that renders this feature useless is that after each song the video window automatically resizes to a smaller default setting. Unless you want the audience watching mouse moves to expand window at the beginning of every song it's pretty much useless; unless your intended use is only for one song. It looks like it's still not addressed in 8.5. Sigh. Good luck on the live front! Brent
|