himalaya
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2006/10/24 12:30:01
- Status: offline
Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
Hi, I've been using Sonar 6.2 up untill now, but I struggle with automation envelopes and the way everything is designed here. I wonder if Sonar 8 or 8.5 has been improved in this regard. Firstly, here's an example of how much automation data I can work with. The following example is produced by Alchemy with its Remix pads: http://img242.imageshack....982/automationmaze.jpg There is no way in Sonar 6.2 to hide certain Synth envelopes. They can be hidden or shown in bulk only. This really slows my session a lot, with all the zooming in and out. And even then it's not plain sailing, see the next point... One of my main problems has been node selection. This image explains it: http://img188.imageshack..../8669/editingnodes.jpg Any info about any improvements and real life observation, especially from those who use lots of automation is greatly appreciated.
|
Rodar6
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 891
- Joined: 2007/05/24 18:02:57
- Location: Leicester UK
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/17 17:41:52
(permalink)
Hey Himalaya, I can't say that I'm an expert but I can share some of my experiences that I've had with envelopes. When you say that you can't hide certain Synth envelopes, which ones are they? From looking at some of your pics I can see that you've written the envelopes either by free hand or with a rotary. After I do this I tend to go back over it and delete the nodes which have no real effect on the transient grade. This cleans things up alot for myself. As for node selection, sometimes multiple nodes are selected which means that I have to click off the envelope to deselect the group, if I only want to adjust one of them. Let me know if I'm in the ball park with some of your questions Rod
"Expert in novice advice" Sonar PE 8.5.1 (pre -5,6,7,8) - Logic Pro Studio 9.1.6 - Windows 7 32bit - Mac OSX Snow Leopard - MacBook Pro 13" i7Core 2.7GHz Sandy Bridge, 8Gb Ram, Intel 520 SSD - Edirol UA-25 - Blue Woodpecker Ribbon - Rode NT5 Condenser - Shure SM57 --- Fender 52 AVRI Telecaster LH - Ovation Special Balladeer LH.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/17 20:00:43
(permalink)
Given your propensity for heavy automation (which I can relate to) I would urge you to try manual rather than recorded automation. That is, placing envelopes with the mouse directly rather than recording control movements. This will greatly reduce the number of nodes - at no cost to fine control - and make it much easier to select individual nodes. Second, if you're having trouble grabbing the right envelope/node, use the maximize button. There are many times when I have two envelopes that are so close together that when I click on one the other gets selected. Maximize it, and suddenly they are miles apart. I'm surprised you can't hide selected envelopes in S6. I thought I was doing that back at S5, but I could very well be mistaken about that. Well, it's a good excuse to upgrade!
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
AL 321
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/04/28 12:48:35
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/17 20:37:12
(permalink)
Himalaya, i'm feeling your struggle. I also use large amounts of automation, and it sometimes feels like i've picked the wrong DAW, when it comes to the type of music i make. But here's something you might not be aware of, and may help you: Did you know you can spread your synth envelopes over multiple midi tracks? Try this: Insert a new midi track and assign it to the instrument you want an envelope for. Now right-click on the track and choose "create track envelope". When it prompts for an envelope type, choose "midi" and then change the dropdown menu from "control" to "NRPN". You'll now see all the instruments parameters listed by name, just like if you were creating an envelope on it's audio track. I don't know if you would be able to record live automation this way, so you might have to record the automation on the audio track, and then cut and paste that onto the new midi track, and then reassign that envelope to the appropriate NRPN parameter. That way you could have 10 or 20 midi tracks assigned to the same synth. All with their own envelope(s) on them. Hope that's of some help to you.
|
himalaya
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2006/10/24 12:30:01
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 06:03:09
(permalink)
I want to answer specific points, but the new quoting system leaves me baffled. So here goes my custom quote system. Hi Rodar6, Quote When you say that you can't hide certain Synth envelopes, which ones are they? Synth Automation envelopes. Sonar can toggle these on or off, I mean show or hide in bulk. So in my example, I can't solo one envelope to work on it. If Sonar had automation lanes it would be easy, but in my opinion automation lanes may not be needed if Sonar allowed to 'solo' the currently selected envelope. By 'solo' I mean, it would hide all automation envelopes but the one currently selected. Quote: From looking at some of your pics I can see that you've written the envelopes either by free hand or with a rotary. After I do this I tend to go back over it and delete the nodes which have no real effect on the transient grade. This cleans things up alot for myself. These automation envelopes were written by tweaking control on Alchemy's GUI, in this example, Alchemy's remix pads and performance knobs. Now, your suggestion to go back and delete individual nodes is logical enough, that's what I have to do anyway, but it is extremely time consuming. There ought to be a feature which 'thins' nodes out. So it would automatically delete all nodes and join the envelope between my selected region on the envelope. So, if my envelope has nodes ABCDEFG, I would select from node B to node F and all nodes in between would be deleted and the envelope joined up in stright line. Quote: As for node selection, sometimes multiple nodes are selected which means that I have to click off the envelope to deselect the group, if I only want to adjust one of them. Exactly. And why do we have to move one envelope or a group of envelopes to select a node ? This is a very bad design. It should work so that once I select an envelope, I can grab any node on this selected envelope. But it isn't the case, as illustrated by my image. This is a major problem for me, just look how many envelopes I tend to deal with. Am I expected to move all/any envelope in this scenario just to get at nodes ? Hi Bitflipper, quote: Given your propensity for heavy automation (which I can relate to) I would urge you to try manual rather than recorded automation. Manual automation is not what i would choose, ever. How could I smootly and intuitively automate an XY pad by drawaing one envelope at a time? If taking the Alchemy example, what I do, and what most people would do to I expect, is to record all the knobs and remix pads either by grabbing them with a mouse or by having them all assigned to physical controllers. It's quick, easy, intuitive. Unlike the manual method. The manual method has no advantage 'timewise' to what I have to spend on editing envelopes now. Quote: Second, if you're having trouble grabbing the right envelope/node, use the maximize button. There are many times when I have two envelopes that are so close together that when I click on one the other gets selected. Maximize it, and suddenly they are miles apart. Yes. In my second image in my first post the track is kind of maximised, and still I can't grab the node on the selected envelope. This shouldn't be so. I'm at enough zoom to be able to do that. To be honest, I shouldn't have to zoom in so much. Now repeat that process with all those envelopes (See first pic) zoom in zoom out.... It can get pretty tiring very quickly. That leads to frustration, which leads to anger... Quote: I'm surprised you can't hide selected envelopes in S6. I thought I was doing that back at S5, but I could very well be mistaken about that. Well, it's a good excuse to upgrade! You can hide envelopes but in groups only: midi, volume, automation...etc. But all my automation envelopes are hidden/shown in bulk in S6. Can you hide individual AUTOMATION envelopes in S8 ? That would be very helpful. Hi Al, Quote: i'm feeling your struggle. I also use large amounts of automation, and it sometimes feels like i've picked the wrong DAW, when it comes to the type of music i make. LOl. Yes, I sometimes feel the same. So, that's why I'm asking here, since it's either I upgrade to 8 and 8.5 or change my host. I feel that Cakewalk does not pay attention to these matters. I shall try your suggestion regarding multiple midi tracks in a minute. Thanks ! :-)
post edited by himalaya - 2009/09/18 06:05:22
|
himalaya
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2006/10/24 12:30:01
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 06:28:22
(permalink)
That's interesting...I just went to Reaper's webpage and on the home page I find this: Use the new intelligent automation thinning slider to turn dense clusters of automation points into smooth gestures. This is exactly what I have been referring to in this thread. Node 'thinning'.
|
Paul Russell
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3892
- Joined: 2003/11/06 23:52:18
- Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 07:27:33
(permalink)
You know that if you press E you get the envelope tool, which allows you to deal only with envelopes, selecting, deleting etc? And that all you have to do is right-click on a line between two points to choose what kind of curve you want it to be? Or the 'learn automation' button W that works for both plugs and softsyths? And the 'hide envelope' util?
|
himalaya
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2006/10/24 12:30:01
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 08:33:30
(permalink)
Paul, with all due respect, have you actually read my posts ? It's not helpful if you just jump in without actually referring to the content of the thread. If I press E, the envelope tool will still not do what I want. The envelope tool will not allow me to select a node on the selected envelope if there are other nodes overlapping. See my very first post. What happens, the node below the one I grab gets selected. Curves ? I'm not asking for these. The 'Learn automation' W button ? Yes, I know, that's how I recorded my automation in the first place. Please read my post again, and if you have any experience with S8.5 do let me know if it improves automation envelopes/nodes editing and management in regards to the issues I have outlined. Thank you.
|
mixsit
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 789
- Joined: 2004/04/30 11:04:24
- Location: CathouseSound
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 11:19:35
(permalink)
himalaya ...As for node selection, sometimes multiple nodes are selected which means that I have to click off the envelope to deselect the group, if I only want to adjust one of them. Exactly. And why do we have to move one envelope or a group of envelopes to select a node ? This is a very bad design. It should work so that once I select an envelope, I can grab any node on this selected envelope. Yes a solo', or a better select' (rather than hide') would be cool. And may I submit that if there were a way to have envelopes be offset' visually in the track pane, all the lines that reside at 'zero for example would not be bunched under each other which in fact even zooming to full page does not help.
Wayne Smith Part time long time.. CathouseSound Mother Ships - StudioCat DAWs Portals - RME
|
AL 321
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 121
- Joined: 2009/04/28 12:48:35
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 13:17:16
(permalink)
Himalaya, to answer one of your other questions, i'm using 8.3.1 and it does allow you to show/hide each individual envelope. You just right-click on the envelope and select "show/hide envelope". So yeah, Sonar 8 would make things easier for you. There's one little bug i've found though, and i'm not sure if 8.5 fixes this: if you have hidden envelopes on a track, and you then create a new envelope on the same track, Sonar decides to 'unhide' all the envelopes you had hidden, so you have to rehide them. But once all your envelopes are in there, you can show/hide each individually at will. I still think it would be easier though, to paste each envelope to a new midi track, and reassign it to the relevant NRPN. Though i suppose that would have to be done after all live recording, and you only need to make tweaks.
|
Paul Russell
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3892
- Joined: 2003/11/06 23:52:18
- Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 13:47:46
(permalink)
himalaya Paul, with all due respect, have you actually read my posts ? It's not helpful if you just jump in without actually referring to the content of the thread. If I press E, the envelope tool will still not do what I want. The envelope tool will not allow me to select a node on the selected envelope if there are other nodes overlapping. See my very first post. What happens, the node below the one I grab gets selected. Please read my post again, and if you have any experience with S8.5 do let me know if it improves automation envelopes/nodes editing and management in regards to the issues I have outlined. Thank you. H there are no specific automation improvements that I can find in 8.5 for you. My workaround for the problems you are mentioning is to hide specific envelopes, zoom in if necessary, adjust and make them visible again. I agree with you that it's not perfect.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 13:52:42
(permalink)
Can you hide individual AUTOMATION envelopes in S8 ? Yes. BTW, I am in total agreement that automation in SONAR has a lot of room for improvement. Despite that, however, I still manage to successfully apply a great deal of complex automation and have never encountered an automation task that SONAR wouldn't let me accomplish. The manual method has no advantage 'timewise' to what I have to spend on editing envelopes now. I guess it's all about what you're comfortable with. The manual method works quite well for me and actually saves time while giving up nothing in the way of fine control. For one thing, I usually get the envelope right (or at least very close) on the first attempt. Recording control movements, for me anyway, is hit-and-miss and nearly always requires subsequent fixing up, which is complicated by the large number of nodes involved. But to each his own! Just don't dismiss the idea out of hand, as it is just an alternate paradigm but completely valid.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 14:02:19
(permalink)
The only way I was able to fix the issues you are having was to mix my projects in a different app that handles automation wonderfully.
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 14:04:29
(permalink)
I have not seen many professional mixing engineers automate using the mouse. Most of them use their control surface/board that I have seen. Using faders allows you to automate in real time while you're listening to the music! bitflipper Can you hide individual AUTOMATION envelopes in S8 ? Yes. BTW, I am in total agreement that automation in SONAR has a lot of room for improvement. Despite that, however, I still manage to successfully apply a great deal of complex automation and have never encountered an automation task that SONAR wouldn't let me accomplish. The manual method has no advantage 'timewise' to what I have to spend on editing envelopes now. I guess it's all about what you're comfortable with. The manual method works quite well for me and actually saves time while giving up nothing in the way of fine control. For one thing, I usually get the envelope right (or at least very close) on the first attempt. Recording control movements, for me anyway, is hit-and-miss and nearly always requires subsequent fixing up, which is complicated by the large number of nodes involved. But to each his own! Just don't dismiss the idea out of hand, as it is just an alternate paradigm but completely valid.
|
himalaya
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2006/10/24 12:30:01
- Status: offline
Re:Before I upgrade to v8 and 8.5 I need advice from experts with Automation Envelopes
2009/09/18 15:56:01
(permalink)
bitflipper, Regarding the manual approach, it will also not work with systems as employed in synths like Alchemy and its Remix Pads. What Remix Pads do, in case you haven't used Alchemy, is they contain multiple assignments, up to 17 different knobs and XY pads! It would be simply impossible to hold up to 17 of those envelopes assigned to one such Remix Pad and draw them. Now, the very cool thing about Alchemy's Remix Pads is that you can slide across all eight pads with a mouse in real time creating smooth transitions. So that's eight pads each shifting up to 17 parameters at the same time! The very first image in the first post at the top shows this exactly. I am also usually against manual envelope drawing as it is not an intuitive approach. In the same manner like playing a guitar gives more organic results than drawing notes on the piano roll which play back a sampled guitar sound. I want to automate while I listen to the music, and not 'dry' with a tool in stop mode. I also made a mistake, since S6 does allow to hide individual envelopes. But it really does not help in a situation where there are tons of automation data. There aren't enough minutes in a day to perform this task.... Instead of hiding envelopes, one by one, why not have an envelope solo ? It would hide all envelopes but one in one go. So I will be off to a feature request thingy. Anyone wants to join ? Please do ! :-) http://www.cakewalk.com/s.port/FeatureRequest.aspx The features/improvements I love to see are: 1. envelope solo 2. better node selection - without having to zoom in. 3. node thinning Cheers ! Tazzman, Which app are you refering to, if you don't mind telling ? :-)
|