eratu
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2856
- Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
- Status: offline
STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived!
For those that have wisely avoided my epically verbose Windows 7/Sonar 8.4 x64 thread ( http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?&m=1852337 ) I just wanted to chime in on how good of low-latency performance I'm getting with Win 7 x64 and Sonar 8.5.1 x64. I'm easily playing back basic/average projects at 32 sample latency (that's 0.7 ms latency one-way, folks, before hitting the DA converters) and not even breaking a sweat, while I pound away live with Omnisphere, AND, I'm synced up to a video clip!!!!! THIS IS CRAZY, INSANE, AND PULSE-POUNDINGLY AWESOME. I'm simply stunned thinking how easily this system (refer to the above thread for details) can handle all this stuff at this kind of latency. Not that I plan on working at this latency that often, I'm just giddy like a little school child that the system has the capability to perform at this level. In my case I'm using a Lynx audio card (with their superb drivers) and I've disabled Aero, but other than that, there's really nothing special about this system. And, by the way, I can also get similar performance on this system out of Cubase 5.1 x64 and Reaper x64, for those that care. Wooohooooooo! I haven't seen how far it can go yet, but I'm just shaking my head in disbelief. :) The future has arrived!
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/19 22:47:51
(permalink)
That's super awesome bro! Please keep us informed.
Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz 8 GB of RAM @ 800 Mhz ATI Radeon HD 3650 Windows 7 Professional (SP1) x64 Cubase 6.03 x64 Sonar PE 8.5.3 x64 RME FireFace 400 Frontier Design Alpha Track Studio Logic VMK-188 Plus http://www.youtube.com/user/SonarHD
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/19 22:59:03
(permalink)
That sounds great Eratu. would you mind posting your exact specs beyond this info from the other thread? 'ASUS P6T motherboard, Core i7 920 and 12GB RAM' I want ONE!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks Tim
|
eratu
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2856
- Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/19 23:00:34
(permalink)
LOL! I mentioned somewhere else that I was getting some tiny dropouts with Omnisphere, but now that I disabled Aero, I'm running smooth as butter (cross my fingers) so far at 32 samples latency... I'm seriously excited right now, and I believe this is a game-changer, or at least a major milestone. This is not a fancy DAW that I have... it's just a typical i7... I think we've entered an entirely new era. :)
|
eratu
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2856
- Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/19 23:10:01
(permalink)
timidi That sounds great Eratu. would you mind posting your exact specs beyond this info from the other thread? 'ASUS P6T motherboard, Core i7 920 and 12GB RAM' I want ONE!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks Tim Windows 7 x64 Professional ASUS P6T Core i7 920 slightly overclocked to 3GHz (using a nice heatsink, see other thread) 12 GB RAM 3X WD Caviar Black hard drives (boot, samples, projects, may add 1-2 more) NVIDIA Quadro FX570 A great little TI-based firewire card (can't remember model, see other thread) Lynx L22 audio card BTW, I also have tested this with my Sapphire Pro 40 so far, and I can only get 128 samples latency no matter what I do with that one. No surprises there, it's a DICE-II based product, but it does work very nicely and sounds great. I REALLY want to see if I can get the Sapphire Pro 40 to work well at 64 sample latency. That would be a real stunner for a DICE-II product. I've done very little tweaking to this system... see the other thread for more details, but this is basic stuff. I did have to disable Aero so I could get clean playback from Omnisphere, though. Other than that, nothing special, here, folks. This is a basic i7. :) Amazing days we live in. :)
|
dontletmedrown
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1722
- Joined: 2006/09/09 13:52:26
- Location: Camarillo, CA
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 00:55:32
(permalink)
You know what's funny-- I have that same mobo. Isn't it ironic that it goes through so much crap BEFORE it even launches windows? I wish I could bypass the Asus banners and the "click here to continue booting..."  Because of the mobo, my DAW's boot time is longer than my older/slower DAW.
post edited by dontletmedrown - 2009/11/20 00:56:34
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 01:25:28
(permalink)
And, by the way, I can also get similar performance on this system out of Cubase 5.1 x64 and Reaper x64, for those that care. When I was assembling/testing Jet-City, I found Sonar's v8's performance (at 96k with a 64-sample ASIO buffer size) absolutely blew Cubase 5 and Reaper out of the water.  That's not to say that Cubase 5 and Reaper are bad performers... Sonar 8 is just incredibly good at ultra low latency settings.
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 01:46:50
(permalink)
dontletmedrown You know what's funny-- I have that same mobo. Isn't it ironic that it goes through so much crap BEFORE it even launches windows? I wish I could bypass the Asus banners and the "click here to continue booting..." Because of the mobo, my DAW's boot time is longer than my older/slower DAW. Dave, I'm not familiar with that specific mobo, but most boards have the ability (in the BIOS) to disable those logo screens. Have you checked?
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 02:24:07
(permalink)
You guys are determined to push me to 64 bits. Well I will get there someday. Sooner rather then later I hope.
post edited by John - 2009/11/20 02:33:26
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:23:06
(permalink)
welcome to the future my friend... although if i had it to over again i would have used the asus p6t6 revolution. it has 7 pcie2 x 16 slots... other than that.... still haven't had the courage to go to 7 yet though... although 7 is pretty much vista ultimate 64 anyways. system specs... 2- 22" digital monitors ASUS p6t Deluxe Intel I7-920 Quad processor 12 gig DDR3 OCZ Platinum ram ATI 4850 HD Series PCIE video 2 tb 720rpm SATA drives 1 500 gig Rapter 10,000 rpm drive UAD-2 Quad core powered plug in card 1,000 watt OCZ power supply Vista 64 bit ultimate Sonar Pro 8.5 V-Sudio700 Yamaha KX8 controller Toft ATB 24 console Yamaha HS 80 M monitors and a partridge in a pear tree
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 03:27:39
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:29:37
(permalink)
the best mother board out there right now is the asus p6t6 revolution.... 7, that's right 7 pcie 2 x 16 slots.....cool around $600 i'm already out of slots but that board wasn't available at the time.
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 03:31:03
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:38:39
(permalink)
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:42:22
(permalink)
only has 2 pcie 16 slots... other than that looks prety good... i'm an asus guy though... never been let down with them... and i build quite a few pc's.....
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:49:05
(permalink)
What would you use the third PCIe2 X16 slot for? Or even the second one?
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 03:52:19
(permalink)
take a look at my hardware profile just up the page.... plus i'm planning on going to the Radat pcie card so i can go with the apogee 16 ad and da converters so i'll need two more pcie slots for that. and probly add another Uad quad card
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 03:53:42
|
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7224
- Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:00:25
(permalink)
yeah yeah performance is great blah blah You've got me pricing motherboards - I hope you're happy. Let's have no more talk about improved performance. Talk to the hand because the wallet aint listening.
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:04:07
(permalink)
go for it man... it's only money. you only live once. a one legged goat can hop just as fast as the keebler elf. whoa.... just had a flash back.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:08:35
(permalink)
Smoochy I may be missing something but the Radat pcie card is a PCI Express x1 slot type card. PCIe X16 are for graphics cards as far as I understand. Unless you are going to add extra graphics cards in say SLI mode a DAW is not going to use those slots.
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:25:58
(permalink)
also may want more graphics... been playing around with the idea of having quad monitors to expand the desktop even more... my philosophy has always been. it's better to have a condom and never need it then to need it and not have it. the price of all those extra slots doesn't cost a lot more and you have to remember... space between cards is also a good thing. who knows what cool new card will come out in the future. maximum expandability... never a bad thing also the pcie 1 will work in a 16 but not the other way around.
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 04:28:13
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:30:29
(permalink)
I look for more USB ports on the MB. 2 graphics slots are plenty. The Gigabyte has 12 USB ports. For a quad display you only need 2 PCIe X16 slots. To my knowledge there are no other type cards that use those slots. Of course you could get 6 displays. Edit to add. I am not discounting the Asus MBs in any way. They are good solid MBs. I have used then in the past and got good service from them. What I found extreme was the notion they are the best. To me that depends on what they are used for. As is true of most any brand.
post edited by John - 2009/11/20 04:35:15
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:33:57
(permalink)
to James (eratu) Glad to hear you're getting such good performance but I have to admit I'm getting that sort of latency with SPE 8.5.1 x64 on VISTA Ultimate x64 SP2 with an i7 920 (not OverClocked) Giga x58 MOBO with 12 GIG G-SKILL DDR 3 RAM. I think Im going to up the onboard cooling device (using stock intel cooler) and start experimenting with overclocking as so many seem to be having success with my combination of components. What sort of speeds do you reckon I'd get to? Any primers on doing the OC as I've never got into it before?
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:37:06
(permalink)
me as well... i'm not over clocked either... i think it has more to do with the new rig and 8.5. i'm not absolutely shure but i've heard of guys actually under clocking to obtain an ultra stable system. on already speedy systems or coarse. iwouldn't suggest trying it on a slower system.
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 04:39:07
|
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:43:47
(permalink)
eratu For those that have wisely avoided my epically verbose Windows 7/Sonar 8.4 x64 thread ( http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?&m=1852337 ) I just wanted to chime in on how good of low-latency performance I'm getting with Win 7 x64 and Sonar 8.5.1 x64. I'm easily playing back basic/average projects at 32 sample latency (that's 0.7 ms latency one-way, folks, before hitting the DA converters) and not even breaking a sweat, while I pound away live with Omnisphere, AND, I'm synced up to a video clip!!!!! THIS IS CRAZY, INSANE, AND PULSE-POUNDINGLY AWESOME. I'm simply stunned thinking how easily this system (refer to the above thread for details) can handle all this stuff at this kind of latency. Not that I plan on working at this latency that often, I'm just giddy like a little school child that the system has the capability to perform at this level. In my case I'm using a Lynx audio card (with their superb drivers) and I've disabled Aero, but other than that, there's really nothing special about this system. And, by the way, I can also get similar performance on this system out of Cubase 5.1 x64 and Reaper x64, for those that care. Wooohooooooo! I haven't seen how far it can go yet, but I'm just shaking my head in disbelief. :) The future has arrived!   Great James! =) I don't think that would work on VISTA x64bit... only on ---> Windows 7 x64 Have a nice weekend! =) Best Regards Freddie
post edited by Freddie H - 2009/11/20 04:47:11
-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
|
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:50:57
(permalink)
John You guys are determined to push me to 64 bits. Well I will get there someday. Sooner rather then later I hope. You just going to love it John! x64 its just awesome with a new computer like i7! Have a nice weekend my friend! =) Best Regards Freddie
-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
|
smoochy
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 629
- Joined: 2009/03/30 22:14:19
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 04:58:23
(permalink)
i only need a few usb's.... one for the controller... one for the mouse and keyboard. and one for the 700. the raydat will handle all my comings and goings once installed. i'll use the 700r for.....? hmmm good questune. but i do like the six monitor idea... that would be cool. i could travel anywhere in the studio and have a look see. i'm not even sure how many usbs the p6td has but it's quite afew. i rely heavily on my plugs and the uad for most stuff. the only external controllers i have are the 700c and the yamaha kx8
post edited by smoochy - 2009/11/20 05:01:27
|
wetdentist
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1129
- Joined: 2007/04/12 19:06:25
- Location: Bethlehem, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 08:21:46
(permalink)
just wanna chime in on the original intent of this thread: yes. yes. yes.
3.5 Ghz AMD 6-Core/16 gigs RAM, Roland Quad-Capture, Win 10, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Komplete 10, z3ta+, Z3TA+ 2, Rapture, Maschine 2.7 (MKI & Jam), Melodyne 4 Studio, Ozone 4, Jam Origin MIDI Guitar 2, Schecter Damien Elite, Fender Sonoran w/TronicalTune Plus installed, etc go here to hear Wet Dentist (2000-2016 RIP) my new sounds: The Das Kaput
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 08:23:11
(permalink)
i dont see the spectacular side of this "news" ;-) i can run projects at 32samples with my rme pci card with winxp sp3 and a core2duo at 3 giga with no major issues... regards edit: ps: as i wrote elsewhere i almost believe people just got so misused to good performance by the silly vista that they now belive that w7 is "hyper" since i have a w764 on my swappable bay i can tell for sure that in my case its NOT 20-40% better than xp - probably even a few % worse !!! but - go on folks - feed the industry - global warming also comes from quad cores that heat up like 150 watt lightbulbs ;-)
post edited by info@tomflair.com - 2009/11/20 08:25:57
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
wetdentist
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1129
- Joined: 2007/04/12 19:06:25
- Location: Bethlehem, PA USA
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 08:29:52
(permalink)
i wasn't raving about Windows 7, but i was raving about x64; my copy of Windows 7 was just put in the mail last night
3.5 Ghz AMD 6-Core/16 gigs RAM, Roland Quad-Capture, Win 10, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Komplete 10, z3ta+, Z3TA+ 2, Rapture, Maschine 2.7 (MKI & Jam), Melodyne 4 Studio, Ozone 4, Jam Origin MIDI Guitar 2, Schecter Damien Elite, Fender Sonoran w/TronicalTune Plus installed, etc go here to hear Wet Dentist (2000-2016 RIP) my new sounds: The Das Kaput
|
eratu
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2856
- Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 09:13:20
(permalink)
mudgel to James (eratu) Glad to hear you're getting such good performance but I have to admit I'm getting that sort of latency with SPE 8.5.1 x64 on VISTA Ultimate x64 SP2 with an i7 920 (not OverClocked) Giga x58 MOBO with 12 GIG G-SKILL DDR 3 RAM. I think Im going to up the onboard cooling device (using stock intel cooler) and start experimenting with overclocking as so many seem to be having success with my combination of components. What sort of speeds do you reckon I'd get to? Any primers on doing the OC as I've never got into it before? Overclocking the i7 is insanely easy. I just googled my motherboard for overclocking and followed the instructions. On my system, I tested 3.3 or 3.4 GHz (ran memtest, prime, etc. for hours) and it was totally fine with reasonable temps. I think I could get 3.6 or 3.7 if I wanted, and still be stable, but I did not try it. There are many people that hit 3.8 or 4 without a problem with these or similar parts. For a DAW, however, I just wanted 3.0 GHz since it was such a nice, round number. :) The temps with this cooler are literally no different than at stock, and it has been extremely stable. I've run memtest and prime on this machine for quite a while to be 100% certain all was well.
|
eratu
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2856
- Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
- Status: offline
Re:STUNNING low-latency performance in Sonar 8.5 x64 on Win 7 x64 - The future has arrived
2009/11/20 09:17:30
(permalink)
info@tomflair.com i dont see the spectacular side of this "news" ;-) i can run projects at 32samples with my rme pci card with winxp sp3 and a core2duo at 3 giga with no major issues... regards edit: ps: as i wrote elsewhere i almost believe people just got so misused to good performance by the silly vista that they now belive that w7 is "hyper" since i have a w764 on my swappable bay i can tell for sure that in my case its NOT 20-40% better than xp - probably even a few % worse !!! but - go on folks - feed the industry - global warming also comes from quad cores that heat up like 150 watt lightbulbs ;-) It's spectacular for me since I could not get Sonar to perform at 32 sample latency on my 8-core Win XP DAW. I also couldn't get Cubase to perform at 32 sample latency with any sort of load. So to be able to have a basic/average project up and running, with a video window open, playing back Omnisphere live, all with tons of headroom left and all at 32 sample latency in all the DAW apps I've tested so far was nothing short of thrilling for me. Technically, my 8-core machine is probably capable of handling larger projects, but not at this latency -- even using a finely-tuned Win XP. Your mileage may vary, of course.
|