Audio Engineer training?

Author
timecho
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10
  • Joined: 2004/09/17 10:11:57
  • Status: offline
2005/04/16 10:30:38 (permalink)

Audio Engineer training?

Has anyone heard of a recording/audio engineer course on CD? I remember reading about one years ago but lost the information. I'm wanting to brushup on my ear and pick up some tips I may have forgotten or allowed to get rusty. I seem to remember a portion of one course on CD that convered a complete frequency ear-training lession group which helped you better distinquish frequencies. In a general sense I can do that now (i.e. That sound is around 4khz, 10khz, 400-800hz etc) but I'd like to be able to determine during a sound reinforcement job, that a feedback ring that's developing is at 2.5k for example.

In recording situations I need better skills at determining that a recorded voice for example, needs a 800hz 3db cut and boost at 3k. Mind you, I do very well now, and have gotten praise from fellow studio engineers. I just want a better ear so I can listen to a sound and "know" what needs to be done, rather than hand tweak the sound for hours until it sounds the way I want.

Any references appreciated. BTW, I seen all the school-type engineer courses available. I'm not interested in the school/teacher approach. I'm looking strictly for a CD/DVD set.

Thanks
Tim
#1

17 Replies Related Threads

    DonnyAir
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1201
    • Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
    • Location: Akron, Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/16 11:13:46 (permalink)
    Personally, I never used them; I found that just working within the environment on a day to day basis resulted in the same type of training over time, but that's just me.

    Please don't misconstrue my reluctance above as advice. I respect any cat who wants to further their knowledge or chops, however or whatever method they choose.

    I believe the series/course you are thinking of is as follows:

    http://www.moultonlabs.com/gold.htm

    Good luck

    Hope this helps.

    Donny
    #2
    chaz
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2775
    • Joined: 2004/02/03 12:08:00
    • Location: Tampa, FL
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/16 12:35:45 (permalink)
    There is no better experience than hands-on training. However, having some guidance will be good.

    There are many resources on the market today. You just have to do an online search and go with what you feel will work best for you.

    One more thing that you can do......

    Take an instument track and run it through a 31-bank EQ filter. Make sure the bands are flat (0dB). Now, take each band and boost it full, each time listening to how the band affects the track.

    This is the best ear training one can do for themself, IMO.

    Hope this helps.
    post edited by chaz - 2005/04/16 12:42:22
    #3
    timecho
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10
    • Joined: 2004/09/17 10:11:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/16 15:32:07 (permalink)
    Thanks guys. Golden Ears sounds familiar and must be what I was remembering. Good alternate training ideas as well. This would be also for someone else who has WAY less experience.

    Tim
    #4
    yep
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4057
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 15:21:41
    • Location: Hub of the Universe
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/18 09:49:07 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: chaz

    Take an instument track and run it through a 31-bank EQ filter. Make sure the bands are flat (0dB). Now, take each band and boost it full, each time listening to how the band affects the track.

    This is the best ear training one can do for themself, IMO.

    Hope this helps.


    This is really good advice. You can also do it with a parametric eq set to a narrow bandwidth (high Q), if you don't have a 31-band graphic eq. Bear in mind that boosting narrow bands of eq to full is not usually a recommended technique for processing audio; what this excersize does is to train your ear to hear what the different frequencies sound like. You learn to "hear" 260 Hz as the bandwidth right around middle C, for instance, and also to hear it as a frequency with a distinct character in the low mids, that could alternately be described as "muddy" or "full" or "warm".

    You can also play with dynamics processors and delay/ambience devices the same way. try using both extreme and subtle settings, hitting the bypass frequently. Learn to "hear" what each parameter on your reverb or compressor sounds like at high, low, and medium settings. This can take time, but one ounce of being able to "hear" the effect of 2dB of compression is worth ten pounds of presets and "mix by numbers" guides.

    Cheers.
    #5
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/29 05:39:41 (permalink)
    I know you want more than EQ, so taking acourse is good-if there are any more experienced engineers in your area that wouldn't mind you sitting in and going out for coffee that is a great learning experience-better than books. But since you did specifically ask for eq here is a rundown.



    The first usable octave for most recording is the 40 - 80 Hz range, with equalization settings centered around 50 Hz. This range of frequencies is often referred to as "Low Bass"
    There is sound between 20 Hz and 40 Hz but little or no sound from instruments. The lowest pipes of a pipe organ will get into this range but more "ordinary" instruments like Bass Guitar, Upright Bass and Foot Drums do not. The lowest pitch on a bass guitar or string bass is at 41 Hz. Thunder, earthquakes and rumble from the building shaking extend below 40 Hz. While mixing, watch out for objectionable sounds below 40 Hz caused by building shifts and mic stands moving with heavy footsteps. If there is objectionable sounds in this range, the range can usually be taken entirely out with a filter.
    The first octave that we deal with (40 - 80Hz) gives more of a "feeling" and sense of "power" to the sound. This range is way down or non-existent in smaller stereo systems. This range is difficult to hear at all at medium and low volume levels because of the Fletcher Munson Effect.
    To properly set the amount of low bass in your mix or in your instrument sound, you must listen both loud and soft. You also may want to listen to the mix or instrument on large and small speaker systems. Too much energy in this range will make the mix sound muddy on large speakers played loud and still sound good on small speakers played at a medium volume. You want the mix or instrument to sound larger and more powerful over large speakers without sounding muddy.
    Rap, Hip Hop and "Dance" music (under various names) often have extra energy in the low-bass range. This is what causes cars equipped with sub-woofers to shake. Usually, however, it is not the entire mix that is boosted below 80 Hz, but just, for example, the foot drum. By boosting the energy on only one or two instruments, "clarity" can be achieved without "mud."


    The Bass Range


    Covering about 1.5 octaves, from 80 Hz to 250 Hz, this range of frequencies determines the "fatness" and "fullness" of the instrument's sound. Equalization is usually applied centered around two frequencies, 100 Hz and 200 Hz.
    For guitars and bass, the 100 Hz range tends to add body and fullness. Excessive energy in this range tends to make these instruments sound "boomy.," This range of frequencies is still greatly affected by the Fletcher-Muson Effect; this means you will need to listen to the mix and instrument both loud and soft. Similar to how the 50 Hz range affects the bass and foot, the guitars should sound fatter when played loud, not boomy. Reducing the 100 Hz energy on the guitar will usually cause distinction between the bass and guitar parts. The lowest fundamental frequency on a guitar is around 80 Hz.
    For vocals the 200 Hz range determines the fullness of the vocal. This range can often be reduced to increase distinction on the vocal. If, however, boosting in higher frequencies on the vocal makes the sound "thin" or "small" a boost of 200 Hz. will restore fullness.
    When 100 Hz is reduced on a guitar or bass to reduce "boom," at small boost at 200 Hz can be helpful to keep the instrument from sounding "lumpy" (certain notes hard to hear and others standing out). The guitar and bass have almost equal energy at their fundamental and 2nd harmonic frequencies. Thus if a range of notes becomes hard to hear because of a at lot of 100 Hz, reducing energy at 100Hz and adding energy at 200 Hz will help the notes be heard again.


    The Bass Presence / Lower Mid Range


    Covering about one octaves from 250 Hz to 500 Hz, this range accents ambience of studio and adds clarity to the bass and lower-string instruments (Chello and Upright Bass). Too much boost can make higher-frequency instruments muffled sounding and low-frequency drums (foot and toms) have a cardboard box quality. Equalization in this range is applied at many frequencies but most often between 300 Hz and 400 Hz.

    The lower part of this range (250 Hz to 350 Hz) is sometimes referred to as "Upper Bass" and is used to increase distinction and fullness on the vocal, especially on female singers.

    The Lower Mid Range in general can be viewed as the "Bass Presence Range" Increasing this range gives clarity to the bass line and the lower-register of pianos and organs. Clarity and distinction can be obtained between the foot drum and bass guitar by both reducing the foot and increasing the bass guitar in this range, at the same frequency.

    This range is often reduced for overhead drum and cymbal microphones to increase clarity and presence on these instruments' and reduced on lower drums (foot and toms) to reduce boxiness.



    The Mid Range


    The Mid Range band of frequencies covers two octaves from 500 Hz to 2 kHz. This range can give a horn-like quality to instruments (500 Hz to 1 kHz) and a "tinny" sound (1 kHz to 2 kHz) or a telephone-like quality (all of the range). Equalization usually centers around 800 Hz and 1,.5 kHz.

    The mid-range also tends to accent the presence (800 Hz) and attack (1.5 kHz) of the bass guitar. The lower pitches of a rhythm guitar can be given more attack by a boost at 1.5 kHz.

    For your Mid Range Instruments (vocals, guitars and piano) this range is most-often reduced rather than accented. Reducing 500 - 800 Hz on an acoustic guitar can remove the "cheep" sound and make it sound more "silvery." Reducing 800 Hz on a vocal makes it sound less nasal and have more body and presence. For snare drums, a reduction of 800 Hz can take the tinny, cheep sound out of the drum and make the snares have more sizzle rather than rattle.



    The Upper Mid Range


    Covering about one octave, this range of frequencies is responsible for the attack on percussive and rhythm instruments and the "projection" of mid range instruments. Equalization can be applied at any frequency in this range but still somewhat centers around 3 kHz.
    On the foot drum, boosting 2.5 kHz or 4 kHz increases the attack. 2.5 kHz sounds more like a felt beater and 4 kHz sounds more like a hard-wood beater. These frequencies can also be used to increase the attack or "hit" sound on toms and snare drums.
    Guitar lines often get more attack and distinction with equalization added at this range. A small boost (1-3 dB) for the vocal will increase projection. Adding too much energy, in this range, makes it hard to distinguish the syllables of the vocal and can cause listening fatigue. This range of frequencies is often reduced on background vocal to give them a more "airy" and "transparent" sound.


    The Presence Range


    Although this range covers a mere half-octave of 4 kHz to 6 kHz, it is an often-used band of frequencies. This range makes most vocals and melody instruments sound closer and more distinct. Over-boosting causes a irritating and harsh sound. Equalization centers around 5 kHz.
    The Treble Range


    Covering approximately that last two octaves of sound (6 kHz to 20 kHz), this band of frequencies is responsible for the brilliance and clarity on instruments. Equalization centers around 7 kHz, 10 kHz and 15 kHz.
    The vocal "S" sounds are at about 7 kHz, making this a frequency that is avoided for vocals. Care must be exercised in reducing 7 kHz on vocals, however, because the vocal will sound dull very fast. The breath sound of the vocal is at 15 kHz and above, giving a breath quality without much accent on the "S": sound of the vocal.
    The 7 kHz frequency is also the "metallic attack" frequency on drums The "sizzle" of cymbals is at 15 kHz.
    When equalizing, 10 kHz and above is often used as a general "brilliance" frequency band.

    Hope that helps.

    Windows 10/64 bit/i7-6560U/SSD/16GB RAM/Cakelab/Sonar Platinum/Pro Tools/Studio 1/Studio 192/DP88/MOTU AVB/Grace M101/AKG Various/Blue Woodpecker/SM81x2/Yamaha C1L Grand Piano/CLP545/MOX88/MOTIF XS Rack Rack/MX61/Korg CX3/Karma/Scarbee EP88s/ Ivory/Ravenscroft Piano/JBL4410/NS10m/Auratones/Omnisphere/Play Composers Selection/Waves/Komplete Kontrol
    #6
    rolo95
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1607
    • Joined: 2004/08/28 01:05:52
    • Location: Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/29 11:30:36 (permalink)

    Michael

    Did you write it... or paste it... ?

    Anyway!!!!!

    pure gold info you share!!!!!

    Greets
    Rolo.

    -----------------------------------------------------
    THERE IS NO POWER Without KNOWLEDGE !!!
    -----------------------------------------------------
    #7
    DonnyAir
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1201
    • Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
    • Location: Akron, Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/30 10:50:29 (permalink)
    Michael

    Did you write it... or paste it... ?


    doesn't matter to me... it's still another one of those "gold" posts that should reside in one of those "go to" folders we've discussed.

    Thanks Michael... good post.

    D.
    #8
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/30 20:07:59 (permalink)
    Did you write it


    no, these principles go way back. Just compiled from different things I've read. And for what it's worth, I know a lot of cats that can put a label on every horn and in theory have an amazing amount of knowledge. Knowledge is good, but wisdom is how to apply the knowledge. Experience is often the hardest but best teacher. Nothing like sending your mix out to a group of 5 professionals to show you how much you have to learn. And it's not always about skill. Sometimes others can just see things better than you because they are not so close to the project. But if you don't care who gets the credit it is amazing how much can be accomplished. Anyway, as far as this article, I definitely cannot take the credit.

    Windows 10/64 bit/i7-6560U/SSD/16GB RAM/Cakelab/Sonar Platinum/Pro Tools/Studio 1/Studio 192/DP88/MOTU AVB/Grace M101/AKG Various/Blue Woodpecker/SM81x2/Yamaha C1L Grand Piano/CLP545/MOX88/MOTIF XS Rack Rack/MX61/Korg CX3/Karma/Scarbee EP88s/ Ivory/Ravenscroft Piano/JBL4410/NS10m/Auratones/Omnisphere/Play Composers Selection/Waves/Komplete Kontrol
    #9
    chaz
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2775
    • Joined: 2004/02/03 12:08:00
    • Location: Tampa, FL
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/30 20:16:52 (permalink)
    Knowledge is good, but wisdom is how to apply the knowledge. Experience is often the hardest but best teacher. Nothing like sending your mix out to a group of 5 professionals to show you how much you have to learn. And it's not always about skill. Sometimes others can just see things better than you because they are not so close to the project.

    Well put, Michael! I could not have said it any better.
    #10
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/04/30 20:19:42 (permalink)
    Well put, Michael! I could not have said it any better.


    oh I bet you could. Come on-give it a try!

    Windows 10/64 bit/i7-6560U/SSD/16GB RAM/Cakelab/Sonar Platinum/Pro Tools/Studio 1/Studio 192/DP88/MOTU AVB/Grace M101/AKG Various/Blue Woodpecker/SM81x2/Yamaha C1L Grand Piano/CLP545/MOX88/MOTIF XS Rack Rack/MX61/Korg CX3/Karma/Scarbee EP88s/ Ivory/Ravenscroft Piano/JBL4410/NS10m/Auratones/Omnisphere/Play Composers Selection/Waves/Komplete Kontrol
    #11
    ucacjbs
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 866
    • Joined: 2004/05/16 18:17:38
    • Location: Philly
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/03 21:49:53 (permalink)
    Michael,

    Thank you for such a marvellously informative post. The way that you, Chaz, Donny Air, nprime and many others share knowledge around these parts is a treat and service for us all. Thanks!

    ben
    #12
    DonnyAir
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1201
    • Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
    • Location: Akron, Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/03 22:01:13 (permalink)
    Glad to help.


    D.
    #13
    codashome
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 157
    • Joined: 2005/04/21 08:27:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/06 09:20:44 (permalink)
    Great summary Michael. I printed it out so I could refer to it later. I find that reviewing things like this while doing rough mixes helps me listen deeper.

    Timecho, you might also want to check out Wayne Wadham's book and companion CD, "Sound Advice: The Musicians Guide to the Recording Studio." It really doesn't have any exercises, but it's a great reference when I can't quite remember what he taught us in class. I'm not sure if the book is still in print, but the CD is available on Amazon. Actually if you got both the Moulton CD and this Wadhams CD, you'd have a good overview of what is taught in at least two courses in the Berklee MP&E program, or at least as it was taught 15 years ago.
    #14
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/06 09:37:47 (permalink)
    much oblige.
    post edited by michael japan - 2005/05/06 09:38:56

    Windows 10/64 bit/i7-6560U/SSD/16GB RAM/Cakelab/Sonar Platinum/Pro Tools/Studio 1/Studio 192/DP88/MOTU AVB/Grace M101/AKG Various/Blue Woodpecker/SM81x2/Yamaha C1L Grand Piano/CLP545/MOX88/MOTIF XS Rack Rack/MX61/Korg CX3/Karma/Scarbee EP88s/ Ivory/Ravenscroft Piano/JBL4410/NS10m/Auratones/Omnisphere/Play Composers Selection/Waves/Komplete Kontrol
    #15
    kidsoncoffee
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 524
    • Joined: 2004/08/04 01:18:50
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/07 00:57:30 (permalink)
    Ya, it's you guy's(you know who you are) that make these forums.
    Your willingness to share knowledge give of your time and doing so with tact and without belittling.
    All of you are a credit to your profesion, and people in general
    hats off
    joe
    #16
    sean1017
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 101
    • Joined: 2005/05/23 11:43:04
    • Location: Chicago/Bucktown
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/23 15:56:51 (permalink)
    Great stuff. After skimming these boards for the past couple days I see there's a lot I can learn around here.

    Thanks Michael
    #17
    Dimuthu_DeeJay
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 264
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 03:24:58
    • Location: Sri Lanka
    • Status: offline
    RE: Audio Engineer training? 2005/05/25 05:56:30 (permalink)
    Michael, Michael, Michael you are the person

    I'm gonna print it.

    www.myspace.com/dimuthu


    #18
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1