|
Author |
Message
|
Gibs Son
-
Total Posts
:
120
- Joined: 11/5/2003
-
Status: offline
|
P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 19, 03 3:36 PM
( #1 )
Has anyone had any P4 denormal problems with the Sonitus or the Timeworks plugs? Time to retire the old PIII 1GHZ systems and go P4 or Xeon. Thanks for you input. Peace, Gibs EDIT>Question re-phrased>>>Those of you WITH P4 systems, please, have you, or have you NOT had any denormal issues using the Timeworks or the UltraFunk plugs? Yes, or No? Thanks Peace, Gibs
< Message edited by Gibs Son -- 11/20/2003 2:52:40 PM >
|
|
|
|
Scott Reams
-
Total Posts
:
1638
- Joined: 11/6/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 19, 03 4:14 PM
( #2 )
ORIGINAL: Gibs Son Has anyone had any P4 denormal problems with the Sonitus or the Timeworks plugs? Time to retire the old PIII 1GHZ systems and go P4 or Xeon. Thanks for you input. There are more options than just P4/Xeon. -S
|
|
|
|
stillfox
-
Total Posts
:
939
- Joined: 11/7/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 20, 03 1:53 AM
( #3 )
I've had no problems with either set of plugins using a P4 2.0gHz.
|
|
|
|
Gibs Son
-
Total Posts
:
120
- Joined: 11/5/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 20, 03 2:51 PM
( #4 )
Thank you stillfox, that is great to hear. And I appreciate the reply. After 25 hits on this topic, and no real reply's other than yours, perhaps I need to re-phrase the question. Those of you WITH P4 systems, please, have you, or have you NOT had any denormal issues using the Timeworks or the UltraFunk plugs? Yes, or No? Scott, Certainly AMD is an alternative, but only at the Opteron/ Xeon level. The XP series is not an option AFAIC unless the Timeworks and UltraFunk plugs have denormalizing issues. Then, and only then will I consider AMD XP processors. Peace, Gibs
|
|
|
|
melloman
-
Total Posts
:
228
- Joined: 11/7/2003
- Location: Portland OR, USA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 20, 03 5:32 PM
( #5 )
I have no problems on my P4C 3 gigger. I think the memory bus helps a bunch, cause I find no CPU spikes running my system, certainly nothing like what I see described as the denormal bug. I did see that on my old P4 1.4. That was a socket 423.
|
|
|
|
zone_ahead
-
Total Posts
:
167
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ill, US
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
November 21, 03 5:06 PM
( #6 )
I've got a P4 2.4Ghz. I have not noticed any denormalization problems at all with the Timeworks plugs from Sonar2 and both have seen and do see quite a bit of use in my projects. As far as the sonitus:fx, I have only been using them for a few weeks and mostly just trying them out, but in that time span I haven't noticed any CPU spikes either.
|
|
|
|
Gibs Son
-
Total Posts
:
120
- Joined: 11/5/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
December 09, 03 6:01 PM
( #7 )
Thought I would say 'thanks' to those who have replied to this post. Peace, Gibs
|
|
|
|
Boogie
-
Total Posts
:
2110
- Joined: 11/19/2003
- Location: CALIFORNIA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
December 10, 03 5:53 PM
( #8 )
No problems here on my 1.5 ghz P4 with Win2k and S2, S3.
|
|
|
|
Shayne White
-
Total Posts
:
269
- Joined: 11/7/2003
- Location: Santa Rosa, CA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
December 12, 03 2:34 AM
( #9 )
I haven't had any denormalization problems with the Sonitus plugins. I've got a P4 2.5GHz. I don't know about the Timeworks plugins; I use the Pulsar versions.
|
|
|
|
willum
-
Total Posts
:
108
- Joined: 11/7/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: P4 CPU and Timeworks
-
December 17, 03 12:26 PM
( #10 )
Same here, I've got a P4 2.4 and the Timeworks and Sonitus plugs work wonderfully (wish I could say the same for all my plugins).
|
|
|
|
|