dude24man
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 357
- Joined: 2005/03/24 07:30:48
- Status: offline
will bitbridge get better with X1B?
will there be any progress made with bit bridge in the next update? tryin to use drumagog 4 with win7 64bit, but clunky. it was mentioned that I use jbridge. just wondering why bit bridge wont work like jbridge? arty
|
benstat
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 972
- Joined: 2007/09/17 10:57:51
- Location: UK
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/01/19 16:24:29
(permalink)
I think it's unlikely I'm afraid. BitBridge has been fairly reliable (in my experience anyway) for some time now. I think a lot of people here would prefer Cakewalk to spend their time fixing other things like some well known X1 shortcomings and AudioSnap.
My DAW: Intel i5, Cakewalk UA-1G, Win7 64 bit, SONAR X1a Producer 64 bit
|
perfectprint
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 862
- Joined: 2010/01/02 02:21:12
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/01/19 16:35:29
(permalink)
i havnt used audio snap yet in x1, whats the problem in the new release?
|
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11050
- Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
- Location: Brandon, Florida
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/01/19 18:45:45
(permalink)
Bitbridge was outsourced (and there isn't anything wrong with that.) Why not just turn it over to a 3rd party vendor so that they can dedicate their resources to the product.
post edited by Mod Bod - 2011/01/19 18:46:53
|
ProjectM
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3941
- Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/01/19 18:59:19
(permalink)
Most of my plugs are working perfectly with BitBridge but I've noticed that some doesn't work unless I wrap them with jBridge. It's just how it is I think. I'm using Win7 Pro X64.
I think that bitBridge is fine, the problems is with plug in makers to make it compatible with it (my speculations of course). Toontrack wrote on their website that in order to use Superior Drummer in 64-bit Sonar you should wrap it with jBridge in stead of BitBridge
(Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6 SoundcloudNegative Vibe Records
|
Jumbicat
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 406
- Joined: 2010/11/11 17:16:42
- Location: Texas, Earth
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/02/26 09:23:41
(permalink)
I've been experiencing the infamous bit bridge crash with soft synths so researched and found out about J Bridge. I'm finding projects that were done on another machine that had soft synths I don't have and removing them from the project, crashes X1 and requires a re-boot.
I'm going to try and reconstruct the project from scratch. I was hoping X1b might have addressed this, but to be honest, I haven't read the gig list of what's being fixed in the next release.
Win7Pro64Bit-AMD-1090t -4 GIG OC DDR3-2k-GTX-465-C300 SATA6-SSD 64G-Sonar 8.5,X2a - Pro Tools Digi-001, a few Axon controllers http://soundcloud.com/jumbicat
|
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11050
- Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
- Location: Brandon, Florida
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/02/26 09:35:54
(permalink)
ProjectM
Most of my plugs are working perfectly with BitBridge but I've noticed that some doesn't work unless I wrap them with jBridge. It's just how it is I think. I'm using Win7 Pro X64.
I think that bitBridge is fine, the problems is with plug in makers to make it compatible with it (my speculations of course). Toontrack wrote on their website that in order to use Superior Drummer in 64-bit Sonar you should wrap it with jBridge in stead of BitBridge
Toontrack policy is that they don't support using their 32 bit products in a 64 bit environment. So instead of wasting resources changing their 32 bit product or chasing down factors as to why a bridging app is failing to help bridging app developers, they put their resources to producing a native 64 bit version of their software. Both 32 bit and 64 bit versions are included with new installers and updates.
|
Deisel401rs
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2005/09/02 19:01:38
- Location: N.Y. N.Y.
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/05/20 11:36:51
(permalink)
I'm wondering......... should i purchase and install "j-bridge" to work together with Bitbridge just in an attempt to avoid any possible problems before I install my 32bit Waves Rennaisance plugins? From what I've read in alot of threads, Bitbridge should do the trick just fine. But i'm thinking "just in case". Still running 8.5.3.
Core 2 Quad Q8300, 8 gigs DDR2, WIN7 x64,Sonar PE 8.7.7, SATA WD650gig(primary), SATA WD160gig(audio),SATA Maxtor(loops,samples) WD320gig external(backup), MOTU 828mkII, Line 6 UX8, , Alesis DM5, Edirol PCR-M80, Wharfedale 8.1s, '86 Les Paul Studio Lite, Fender Blackout Tele, Breedlove Acoustic/Electric Bass, Schecter Deluxe Bass, Dean Luna Acoustic, Line 6 500 Variax. Keeley Compressor, Line 6 PODXT Live, Roland GR-20 Synth.
|
bluzdog
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1928
- Joined: 2007/10/06 17:15:14
- Location: Lakewood, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:will bitbridge get better with X1B?
2011/05/20 13:28:40
(permalink)
My Waves Gold Bundle V8 plugs work fine with Sonar X1. Why not try 'em and see.
|