stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 12:17:49
(permalink)
somo
...But why should I adapt?
Because one item per thread allows other users to vote on that one item. Including multiple requests in a single forum thread can make it impossible for others to vote if both they agree and disagree with the items you are requesting. And less votes overall can mean less priority for Cakewalk. But you were also referring to templates so I'm not sure if the text you quoted (about creating one thread per request) is actually related? Or if it's simply a language thing.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
somo
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2015/06/22 15:41:20
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 16:24:34
(permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
somo
I know how they work templates. But why should I adapt? Sonar should work well without the use of templates. With this approach, Sonar will never be improved! For other useful answers thank you.
? What have you got against using templates
That allows you to do what you need right?
If you are stating there are bugs then you are in the wrong forum, you should create a new thread for each issue...If you seriously want Sonar to be improved you should have seperare thread for each of these items or vote on existing threads.
I have nothing against using templates. You have not understood the main idea. Sorry, I'm not here to discuss threads. It became. People have already written comments. Please discuss about the subject of this thread (like others here) - your progress is now 0%!
post edited by somo - 2015/07/20 16:34:27
|
somo
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2015/06/22 15:41:20
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 16:33:32
(permalink)
stevec
somo
...But why should I adapt?
Because one item per thread allows other users to vote on that one item. Including multiple requests in a single forum thread can make it impossible for others to vote if both they agree and disagree with the items you are requesting. And less votes overall can mean less priority for Cakewalk.
But you were also referring to templates so I'm not sure if the text you quoted (about creating one thread per request) is actually related? Or if it's simply a language thing.
You did not understand... This was the answer to the templates.
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 16:54:08
(permalink)
somo, why do you come here as a new user and insist that things should be done your way. There are established rules for the forums and we all try and obey them. You do not seem to care about rules, and feel things should be done your way.
Your progress is now 0%!
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
Doktor Avalanche 
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 17:06:23
(permalink)
... as is what happens when you discuss too many things at once. I suggest calling this thread a day and do things one thread at a time. I say again... suggest.
Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
|
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12016
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
- Location: Putnam County, NY
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 17:22:23
(permalink)
Doktor Avalanche
... as is what happens when you discuss too many things at once. I suggest calling this thread a day and do things one thread at a time. I say again... suggest.
Yes, please. One FR per thread in this forum; otherwise it's very difficult to vote. Lists of FRs in a single thread seem to do okay in the SONAR forum, though. (I'd still prefer they were broken out, but maybe that's just me...). -Susan
2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAMWindows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
|
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3922
- Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
- Location: Victoria, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 17:48:58
(permalink)
Susan G
Doktor Avalanche
... as is what happens when you discuss too many things at once. I suggest calling this thread a day and do things one thread at a time. I say again... suggest.
Yes, please. One FR per thread in this forum; otherwise it's very difficult to vote...
It's not only about voting. Having several separate discussions within a single thread makes it difficult to take part. The longer the thread becomes, the more confusing it gets.
SonarPlatinum∞(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
|
RD9
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 154
- Joined: 2015/04/04 02:51:09
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/20 19:51:01
(permalink)
It may be time to wrap this post up and move the remaining unresolved items into separate posts as suggested. The reason I liked this post initially was that it summarised the views of someone new to Sonar who had experience with other DAWs. A fresh pair of eyes often sees things in a different way and Somo's directness helped cut to the heart of the specific matters (I am an advocate of what Robert Sutton calls "strong opinions loosely held" as an effective way to identify and solve problems). I also learned quite a bit from the earlier posts from experienced users who responded with specifics. Cheers, R
post edited by RD9 - 2015/07/20 19:58:26
|
somo
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2015/06/22 15:41:20
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/21 00:42:58
(permalink)
OK
post edited by somo - 2015/12/26 14:49:48
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: 8 fundamental problems in Sonar and other improvements
2015/07/21 09:27:45
(permalink)
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|