ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME??

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
vaultwit
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 543
  • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
  • Status: offline
2011/12/19 01:34:10 (permalink)

ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME??

I tried using ASIO with my M-Audio Fast Track MKII USB interface, and I had to use the following in order to playback my project without any popping or buzzing:

25.6 msec, 1130 samples

Any lower, and I'll get lots of artificts in the playback. However, with MME drivers that I was using before I got the interface, I was using the following without any popping or buzzing:

20.0 msec, 882 samples

The MME gave me better latency, but I thought ASIO was supposed to be better? Am I not understanding something? Should I still stick with the ASIO or go back to MME?

Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
#1

40 Replies Related Threads

    Muziekschuur at home
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1442
    • Joined: 2006/03/01 03:30:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 02:58:58 (permalink)
    Yes. I have that too. Allthough I now use PCI cards and an one is an RME digi9636 does 64 samples. But my system has an DELTA RBUS too. When I aggregate both devices I can do (windows 7 32bit) 64 samples aswell...

    Under Windows 7 I have noticed MME and WDM drivers are very much so improved...

    Cakewalk Sonar Platinum Windows 7 32bit & 64bit (dualboot) Gigabyte mobo Intel dual quad 9650 & 4GB Ram RME DIGI9636 & Tascam DM24.  M-audio Rbus & SI-24 Alesis Pro active 5.1 & Radford 90 transmissionline monitors. Roland RD-150 piano Edirol UM-880 & alesis fireport.
    Remote recording Alesis HD-24 & Phonic MRS 1-20.
    P.A. D&R Dayner 29-8-2 & behringer MX8000 (& racks)
    Rackpc Sonar Platinum with win10 AMD X6 1055T, 16GB Ram
     Dell inspiron 17R 6gb ram W10 two SSD's Sonar Plat.
    #2
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 10:24:14 (permalink)
    So I don't get it... Should I just go back to using the MME drivers, or stick with ASIO?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #3
    pwal
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2909
    • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 10:27:12 (permalink)
    use whichever is better for you - did you also try wdm?

    list of stuff
    #4
    brundlefly
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 14250
    • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
    • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 10:38:39 (permalink)
    Neither of those values is acceptable for being the lowest you can go. So you might say MME was "better" on your machine, but something is terribly wrong if you can't get down into the 128-256 sample range with ASIO drivers, unless the project is really big.

    Having to run a buffer that high suggests the PC needs tuning to lower the DPC latency or there's some other conflict that needs to be resolved.



    SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
    Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
    #5
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 10:45:38 (permalink)
    brundlefly


    Neither of those values is acceptable for being the lowest you can go. So you might say MME was "better" on your machine, but something is terribly wrong if you can't get down into the 128-256 sample range with ASIO drivers, unless the project is really big.

    Having to run a buffer that high suggests the PC needs tuning to lower the DPC latency or there's some other conflict that needs to be resolved.

    What do you suggest I do? If I go to 128 samples, the project plays but I hear a good amount of crackling and buzzing... If I go up to 256, it gets a lot better but I still hear slight buzzing every once in a while

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #6
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/19 10:55:55 (permalink)
    * disable antivirus (and the internet)
    * disable wireless internet radio
    * disable any memory resident programs that might be polling something
    * disable any webcams or TV Tuners
    * run the DPC Latency checker

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #7
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 01:39:20 (permalink)
    Beagle


    * disable antivirus (and the internet)
    * disable wireless internet radio
    * disable any memory resident programs that might be polling something
    * disable any webcams or TV Tuners
    * run the DPC Latency checker

    I ran a DPC latency check, and it doesn't seem very good... I'm getting basically 2000 μs the entire time. However, I don't know which of the items you listed I can sacrifice.
     
    I need virus protection because I use my laptop to access the internet, and I want to protect my laptop from viruses. I don't use internet radio or TV tuners. My webcam is built into my laptop.

    What else could I do to reduce my DPC latency, or in any way improve my situation? Thanks

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #8
    Muziekschuur at home
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1442
    • Joined: 2006/03/01 03:30:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 05:47:48 (permalink)
    Don't panik. Just test em first...
    You can disable internet during working in sonar can't you?

    Cakewalk Sonar Platinum Windows 7 32bit & 64bit (dualboot) Gigabyte mobo Intel dual quad 9650 & 4GB Ram RME DIGI9636 & Tascam DM24.  M-audio Rbus & SI-24 Alesis Pro active 5.1 & Radford 90 transmissionline monitors. Roland RD-150 piano Edirol UM-880 & alesis fireport.
    Remote recording Alesis HD-24 & Phonic MRS 1-20.
    P.A. D&R Dayner 29-8-2 & behringer MX8000 (& racks)
    Rackpc Sonar Platinum with win10 AMD X6 1055T, 16GB Ram
     Dell inspiron 17R 6gb ram W10 two SSD's Sonar Plat.
    #9
    thomasabarnes
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3234
    • Joined: 2003/11/11 03:19:17
    • Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 07:41:25 (permalink)
    vaultwit:
     
    Un-install your current anti-virus software.

    Get Avast home Edition free anti-virus program (http://downloads.yahoo.com/software/windows-security-avast-free-antivirus-s41886 .) It works well with SONAR installed and it doesn't interfere with the performance of SONAR.

    If you have any wireless network adapters, disable them permanently (or while running SONAR), or use an onboard ethernet adapter.

    After doing this stuff, re-run the DPC Latency Checker and see what the readings are like. You need to fix any problems contributing to high DPC latency, so that the readings are in the green. The lower the readings, the better.

    Other things to disable are BIOS settings such as HPET, and power management options in the BIOS. Disabling these things will decrease your DPC latency. Low DPC Latency contributes to SONAR running stable and performing good. You have to decide if that's something you want or not, (SONAR running at low latency settings without dropouts, pops, clicks, and trash like that.)

    My PC is mainly for music production, so applying these tweaks for low DPC latency is a must for me, and I have no problem with doing this. My DPC Latecy is constantly under 100usecs on average, and I run my projects with a 64 samples buffer setting with great performance using SONAR X1.
    post edited by thomasabarnes - 2011/12/20 07:48:25


    "It's not a song till it touches your heart. It's not a song till it tears you apart!" Lyrics of Amy Grant.

    SONAR Platinum X64 (jBridge), Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit, Core i7 990X Extreme Edition Processor 3.46 GHz 6 Cores, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, Crucial Ballistix 24GB 1333MHz DDR3 @1333 MHz, TASCAM UH-7000, Behringer X-Touch, EVGA GTX 980TI Superclocked 6GB, 1TB Samsung EVO 850 SSD, 150GB, 320GB, 1TB 7200rpm HDDs
    #10
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:02:30 (permalink)
    Wow vault, there is definitely a problem somewhere. I'd say you got some great advice from everyone so far, so I have nothing to add that's not been said. However, I just wanted to share this with you because I found it sort of strange.

    I have a stock Dell Inspiron I'm working with this morning from my home. It's nothing close to my real recording pc's, but this thing is completely stock, has a stock soundcard, a million things running, nothing disabled, and I have no problems running Sonar at 64 samples using ASIO4ALL. This box is a first generation i3, 4 gig of RAM, Win 7 64 box. I'm running Sonar 32 bit on it at the moment. But look at this screen shot. Honest this works perfectly for me without any drop outs, clicks or pops. Granted, I can't run a ton of tracks on it like this, but there are no issues at all for basic use as well as recording with softsynths in real time. Look at how many things I have running on this box at the time of the shot.



    HQ pic here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4909348/StockDell.JPG

    It's just crazy how much I have running on this thing. Even Norton Security Suite...which is known to be a total resource hog.

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #11
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:25:27 (permalink)
    commenting on the anti-virus thing. 

    I removed the CA Internet Security suite from all my machines and went to the free ones from Avast and Microsoft. 

    Both are much easier on the CPU drain, and so far I have had no problems with infections either. My computers start faster and run leaner. My daughters thanked me the day I switched theirs too for the same reason. 

    With those heavy CPU AV programs running in the background, the performance of other things that need the CPU to run quickly and efficiently  (Sonar) will suffer in the performance arena. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #12
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:35:24 (permalink)
    but you don't need antivirus or internet WHILE you're recording or mixing.  disable those things while you're working in sonar.  I didn't mean you needed to disable them permanently.
     
    FWIW I have my computer connected to the internet all the time, even during recording and mixing.  but I don't have DPC spikes like you do.  Thomas' suggestion of changing your AV might work, too.
    I use MS Essentials and have not had a problem out of it.
    post edited by Beagle - 2011/12/20 08:43:58

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #13
    RodC
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 302
    • Joined: 2005/11/10 08:37:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:39:57 (permalink)
    Have you tried WMD?  I had better luck with it using a delta 1010.

    http://www.beyondsanityproductions.com/

    'sorta like a peace rally fist fight'

    SPE X1c  MOTU 24 i/o,  AMD Phenom II X6 3.3 GHz 8G RAM, SSD OS HD
    #14
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:50:15 (permalink)
    It has always been my understanding that the ASIO drivers are supposed to be the optimum ones for working with Audio especially if the interface support them as the M-Audio does. 


    That would indicate to me, that something else is causing the crackles and pops.  More than likely it is a settings issue, but the other TSR stuff that runs continually in the back ground could very well be the problem. There are only a limited number of CPU cycles available and if the TSR's get priority, the audio will suffer. 

    Disconnect from the net and shut off everything that is not needed. Others have listed that stuff. 

    There is no reason why the DAW should not run properly with ASIO on the computer you have. 

    I'm running an i5 chip with XP32. 

    I'm also not up to speed on the entire W7/64  running X164 either. Is it possible there is some sort of issue with the 64bit stuff not working together properly? 

    Heck, I used to run my DAW on a stock DELL laptop with Vista32 as the OS..... and......with the internet connected and ON, as well as the wireless Wi-Fi running and ALL the other stuff like AV running and my latency on that computer and interface was about 8ms which is low enough that I could not hear it. 

    Hope you get this figured out because yeah, I do know how irritating it is to have latency over 15ms. When I first started the lappy and installed the DAW ....latency was pretty high, but working on it, adjusting settings, got it under control. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #15
    Crg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7719
    • Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 08:52:22 (permalink)
    In addition to everything above, make sure you have the latest M-Audio drivers for your OS. If you're not doing so already, run Sonar as an adminstrator. You have to realize that DAW programs require priority in terms of processing and ram access. The background services required for anti-virus and internet connections get mixed in with processing scheduling through your chip and hardware. This can add enormous amounts of time to your latency factor, plus add unknown responses from the other software which can interrupt your audio streaming in ASIO mode causing crashes, audio engine dropouts, artifacts, etc.
    You really need to disable all unneeded background services and any software with monitoring features. ASIO is going to be the best with your M-Audio interface. You should be able to get down to under 10ms at 256 samples with no problem.

    Craig DuBuc
    #16
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 16:10:06 (permalink)

    I only have one computer (this laptop) that I use for everything, and music making is just one of the things I use it for. However, I would like to get the sample rate down to 128 if possible, which I think it is for a system like mine.

    After reading all of the responses, I still don't see a lot I can do to reduce my DPC latency. I currently have AVG Free Antivirus installed, so I can switch to Avast to see if it makes a difference. I have tried connecting my interface to all the different USB porst on my laptop, and I get the same result with all the ports. I do have the latest M-Audio drivers installed, and I set my Sonar to always run as adminstrator. Also, I DO use my internet even while mixing/recording, so I need to be connected to the internet at all times.

    One thing that I will try is the following:

    thomasabarnes

    Other things to disable are BIOS settings such as HPET, and power management options in the BIOS. Disabling these things will decrease your DPC latency. Low DPC Latency contributes to SONAR running stable and performing good. You have to decide if that's something you want or not, (SONAR running at low latency settings without dropouts, pops, clicks, and trash like that.) 



    However, I'm not sure how. Is there an option somewhere to "disable HPET" and "disable power management" for BIOS? If so, I can try to google the instructions for it. Would I be risking anything by making those changes to my BIOS?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #17
    Lanceindastudio
    Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4604
    • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 16:47:35 (permalink)
    AVG is fine-

    Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
    i7 3770k CPU
    32 gigs RAM
    Presonus AudioBox iTwo
    Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
    Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
    Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
    Presonus Eureka
    Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
    #18
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 20:00:47 (permalink)
    Alright. So I really couldn't think of anything that could contribute to DPC latency since I have AVG Free Antivirus (which, according to Lance, should be fine), so I decided to disable my wireless driver and check it again. Afterwards, my DPC latency was in the green all the way - peaked to yellow exactly once, but other than that was in the green in the 100-200 usec range the entire time.

    I opened up X1 to try it out, and again, 128 samples is impossible - complete crackling and buzzing. I went up to 256, and still some buzzing every here and there... so basically, the same results as before. Thus, I'm convinced that DPC is not the culprit.

    Anything else that could be causing the latency problems? I would love to get down to 128 samples if possible... Thanks in advance.

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #19
    brundlefly
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 14250
    • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
    • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 20:18:48 (permalink)
    Thus, I'm convinced that DPC is not the culprit.



    It may not be the sole problem now, but you will definitely need to keep it in the green to avoid problems once you get other issues resolved. And it's the variability that gets you; if you're still seeing spikes, you need to get to the bottom of that even if they're not into the red.


    SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
    Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
    #20
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 20:28:49 (permalink)
    brundlefly

    It may not be the sole problem now, but you will definitely need to keep it in the green to avoid problems once you get other issues resolved. And it's the variability that gets you; if you're still seeing spikes, you need to get to the bottom of that even if they're not into the red.

    So you're saying, in an ideal setup, there would not be ANY spikes at all? And the DPC latency should be in the green at all times?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #21
    Crg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7719
    • Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 21:17:04 (permalink)
    Every computer build is different. What works for one build doesn't always work for another. This is especially true in relation to different brands of computers. The only way to get a computer to handle DAW programs without artifact or problem is to individualy weed out what software interferes with-takes procesor time away from-uses memory the DAW needs on a machine by machine basis. The guys that build dedicated recording computers have learned how to recognize what the problems are by interpreting the error messages and the usage profiles per software entity installed and either disabling, replacing or deleting software which takes away from DAW processing needs. It can be a whole slew of things. Software, hardware limitations, inaccurate drivers from interface manufacturors, conflicting software. It's not just plug and play sometimes. Don't blame Sonar because I could name a whole list of other software that didn't work because of the same problems. Blame the ongoing inaccurate still maturing science and art of the craft of electronic communication. Weed it out dude.

    Craig DuBuc
    #22
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 21:24:34 (permalink)
    Well now I'm in a situation where I don't know what I can do to lower my sample rate. Still, the lowest I can go is 1024. I would like 128.

    I've tried disabling my network adapters to reduce my DPC latency, but what else can I do? Even after disabling them, I still get yellow (and sometimes even red) peaks. I have the latest drivers installed, and everything should be working fine. Now I'm stuck and I don't know what more to do. With a system like what I have (Win7, i5, 8gb ram) I should be able to get down to 128 samples, no?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #23
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 21:54:45 (permalink)
    Have you disabled the onboard sound chip? There has to be something running that is fighting for resources and memory. This is all sounding like a resource conflict to me. If you can get your hands on an external powered USB hub that would rule out power sag on the USB.

    Get a program like CCleaner and look at all the startup and TRS programs. I run this program daily and it really helps keep the system in shape. Also go into windows and check for problem devices and shared IRQ/DMA.

    When the problems are as large as you describe there's usually a fairly simple solution.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #24
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/20 22:07:50 (permalink)
    ampfixer


    Have you disabled the onboard sound chip? There has to be something running that is fighting for resources and memory. This is all sounding like a resource conflict to me. If you can get your hands on an external powered USB hub that would rule out power sag on the USB.

    Get a program like CCleaner and look at all the startup and TRS programs. I run this program daily and it really helps keep the system in shape. Also go into windows and check for problem devices and shared IRQ/DMA.

    When the problems are as large as you describe there's usually a fairly simple solution.

    I have the following under "sounds" in my Device Manager:


    M-Audio Fast Track
    NVIDIA High Definition Audio
    NVIDIA High Definition Audio
    NVIDIA High Definition Audio
    NVIDIA High Definition Audio
    Realtek High Definition Audio

    I have no idea why there are 4 "nvidia" ones... should I disable everything except the M-audio?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #25
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/21 01:51:20 (permalink)
    Yes. The nvidia audio is likely there for support of HDMI output which is both audio and videao. The realtek will be your onboard sound chip. Once they are all disabled re-boot and ensure they are shut off. You should disable the wi-fi while you are in Sonar mode since you have already proven that it causes trouble.

    I think you're getting close, good luck!

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #26
    vaultwit
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 543
    • Joined: 2011/08/02 20:53:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/21 01:57:10 (permalink)
    ampfixer


    Yes. The nvidia audio is likely there for support of HDMI output which is both audio and videao. The realtek will be your onboard sound chip. Once they are all disabled re-boot and ensure they are shut off. You should disable the wi-fi while you are in Sonar mode since you have already proven that it causes trouble.

    I think you're getting close, good luck!

    Should I disable the NVIDIA ones too, or just the realtek?

    Sonar X1 Producer Expanded 64-bit
    Computer: Intel Core i7-3770 3.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Windows 8 
    Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
    #27
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/21 04:12:24 (permalink)
    All of them.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #28
    Crg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7719
    • Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/21 06:54:17 (permalink)
    Disable the NVIDIA for sure. Realtek = trouble, every time I've had to deal with one. You may have to play with the settings on the realtek. There are several versions of it out there. Of course select the M-Audio as your in/out. With the NVIDIA probably associated with your display-graphics software, you may have to change settings on that also if you are using the HDMI drivers.

    Craig DuBuc
    #29
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:ASIO vs. MME... getting better latency with MME?? 2011/12/21 07:47:58 (permalink)
    Over in the Music Creator forum another user there just solved his latency problem by removing his old CA Computer Associates Anti-virus suite and replacing it with something else. 


    That whole thing about the AV stuff and the TSR stuff turned out to be his problem. I know that when I had CA-AV it did slow the machine down.   I now use MS Security Essentials for all my internet machines. My DAW as no AV on it at all, but it's not on the internet either. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1