AnsweredBapu's (and others) random thoughts for the day.

Page: << < ..666667668669670.. > >> Showing page 670 of 1120
Post
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 11:51:42
Talking of day to day stress...
 
 
We're still waiting Bubba.....
UbiquitousBubba
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:00:25
NOW I'M STRESSED!
 
(I know. I've had some other demands. I really need to carve out time on a daily basis.)
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:13:29
Beagle
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.



Wait.
 
Are you saying the "vocal minority" aren't buffoons?
 
You mean their ridicalos arguments were meant to be taken seriously and not just for laughs?
 
I guess I never unnerstand anything anymore. 
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:15:59
UbiquitousBubba
 I really need to carve out time on a daily basis.

Careful,  there's not much of it each day as it is..   We could really do with adding more.
Bert Guy
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:17:35
FSF stands for?
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:18:46
BINGO !!
 
 
 
Bert Guy
FSF stands for?

Forum Super Fred (thread)
Shambler
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:24:08
The FSF Thread, it's the only place in the CoffeeHouse I feel I can espresso myself.
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:36:10
drewfx1
Beagle
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.



Wait.
 
Are you saying the "vocal minority" aren't buffoons?
 
You mean their ridicalos arguments were meant to be taken seriously and not just for laughs?
 
I guess I never unnerstand anything anymore. 


I'm sorry to be the one to have to burst your bubble of naiveté, Drew, but it's true!
 
 

 

 
It's TWU, it's TWU!!!!
 
wait...was that buffoonery???
post edited by Beagle - 2015/04/29 12:44:20
UbiquitousBubba
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:37:48
Beagle
drewfx1
Beagle
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.



Wait.
 
Are you saying the "vocal minority" aren't buffoons?
 
You mean their ridicalos arguments were meant to be taken seriously and not just for laughs?
 
I guess I never unnerstand anything anymore. 


I'm sorry to be the one to have to burst your bubble of naiveté, Drew, but it's true!
 
j/k
 
(or Am I?)




Unclarified
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:42:02
UbiquitousBubba
Beagle
drewfx1
Beagle
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.



Wait.
 
Are you saying the "vocal minority" aren't buffoons?
 
You mean their ridicalos arguments were meant to be taken seriously and not just for laughs?
 
I guess I never unnerstand anything anymore. 


I'm sorry to be the one to have to burst your bubble of naiveté, Drew, but it's true!
 
j/k
 
(or Am I?)




Unclarified


I like my edit better...
kakku
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:45:55
Question: what common is there between the mighty Juggernaut and this thread? Answer: Hahaa, I am not saying it yet. Instead you guys can surely guess. I will say the right answer shortly.
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby Shambler 2015/04/29 13:41:30
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 12:55:09
Bert Guy
FSF stands for?



Equal silliness for all!
 
(But, to be fair, it doesn't really stand, it just sort of pools like sewage in a septic tank.)
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 13:44:49
For Sucks Fake?
kakku
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 13:47:30
Finest subscribable fred?
post edited by kakku - 2015/04/29 13:57:01
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 13:49:01
Futzy Sh!te Forever.
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2015/04/29 13:57:42
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 13:52:43
Forum Sussed Fred
Forum Super Fred
Forum Sux Fred
 
wait...that didn't come out right...
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 14:24:15
Proper Spelling Fred
kakku
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 14:35:08
kakku
Question: what common is there between the mighty Juggernaut and this thread? Answer: Hahaa, I am not saying it yet. Instead you guys can surely guess. I will say the right answer shortly.

The answer is:both are unstoppable:)
kakku
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 14:48:23
Formulaic sentences fred
Family stuff Fred
Frivolous sentiments fred
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby drewfx1 2015/04/29 16:35:00
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 14:57:53
drewfx1
Proper Spilling Fred


fyxed
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 14:58:40
Cake=Bakers
(JB is cracking up right now)
 
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 15:03:53
Hey,  enough of the copycat FSF definitions already!!!
Karyn
Ma-Ma
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2015/04/29 15:16:38
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 15:04:51
bapu
(JB is cracking up right now)

I thought it was last year he got married?
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2015/04/29 15:16:34
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 15:10:45
Karyn
bapu
(JB is cracking up right now)

I thought it was last year he got married?


That would have been Mrs. JB who would be cracking up last year...and this year...and next year...
Bert Guy
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 16:09:47
Gee, thanks for all the inconsistent, abstruse, arcane, incomprehensible, dysmorphic, incongruent, outlandish, insulting, and utterly unhelpful definitions of FSF!
 
Now for something completely different...
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 16:25:25
Bert Guy
Gee, thanks for all the inconsistent, abstruse, arcane, incomprehensible, dysmorphic, incongruent, outlandish, insulting, and utterly unhelpful definitions of FSF!
 
Now for something completely different...


don't mention it.
 
really.......DON'T
kakku
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 16:43:42
Bert Guy
Gee, thanks for all the inconsistent, abstruse, arcane, incomprehensible, dysmorphic, incongruent, outlandish, insulting, and utterly unhelpful definitions of FSF!

You're welcome! Now all you have to do is categorize and analyse each definition and make a Powerpoint presentation of the satisfaction level that you gained from the whole FSF experience.
Bert Guy
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 17:10:01
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 17:58:11
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


{official definition}
Back story. Fred = Thread
Jonbouy dubbed this longest running thread/fred as a Forum Super Fred.
{/official definition}
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:02:34
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma enema machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


phyxed
 
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:02:38
bapu
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


{official definition}
Back story. Fred = Thread
Jonbouy dubbed this longest running thread/fred as a Forum Super Fred.
{/official definition}


Yeah right,  you expect him to believe that?
At least make up something that sounds plausible... 
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:03:25
Karyn
bapu
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


{official definition}
Back story. Fred = Thread
Jonbouy dubbed this longest running thread/fred as a Forum Super Fred.
{/official definition}


Yeah right,  you expect him to believe that?
At least make up something that sounds plausible... 


OK, Bubba went back in time.........
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:04:11
bapu
Karyn
bapu
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


{official definition}
Back story. Fred = Thread
Jonbouy dubbed this longest running thread/fred as a Forum Super Fred.
{/official definition}


Yeah right,  you expect him to believe that?
At least make up something that sounds plausible... 


OK, Bubba went back in time.........


Now we're cookin
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:16:24
Karyn
bapu
Karyn
bapu
Bert Guy
 
It sounds like FSF has been run through an enigma machine and now there are an infinite number of fraudulent definitions that I must sift through! What a daunting task!


{official definition}
Back story. Fred = Thread
Jonbouy dubbed this longest running thread/fred as a Forum Super Fred.
{/official definition}


Yeah right,  you expect him to believe that?
At least make up something that sounds plausible... 


OK, Bubba went back in time.........


Now we're cookin


And future Buuba unearthed the way past Bubba's (which is actually the present Bubba) declarations about a Fred to come. And, how it would CHANGE EVERYTHING.  
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:20:02
What changes everything?
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 18:20:15
A TOP !!!
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 20:10:26
You changed your top?  With all the weirdos around here I'd think you'd want to do that in private. 
(Just sayin'...)
Karyn
Ma-Ma
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2015/04/29 21:39:29
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 21:21:01
Why is it..  that when you're working late (middle of the night here) and you know you're the only one in the building and the main door and main gate is locked....
 
.. you still lock the toilet door when you go?
 
or is that just me?
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 22:38:57
Just you.  I tend to use the boss' fake plant in his office.
Karyn
Ma-Ma
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/29 23:18:07
Is it dead yet?
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 00:39:13
Karyn
Is it dead yet?


Not as dead as this fred.
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2015/04/30 10:06:54
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 01:21:24

THD.
(Total Harmonica Distortion.)
Bert Guy
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 01:36:00
craigb
Just you.  I tend to use the boss' fake plant in his office.


heh     
 
I guess if you work somewhere that the boss doesn't have plants, any available windows might do, or maybe the sink in the breakroom.


SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby Mesh 2015/04/30 10:14:24
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 09:43:28
Beagle
Can I be honest with you guys in here for a minute?  I promise just for a minute then we can all go back to our buffoonery.
 
When bapu created this thread I did not like it at all.  In my mind this thread was simply a way to keep some people from complaining about the numerous "buffoonery" threads in the CH; One thread to rule them all, One thread to find them, One thread to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.  more or less...
 
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.
 
ok,...back to your regularly scheduled buffoonery.




To all...
 
Please don't feel you have to "bow to the wishes of the vocal minority".
 
Post what you like, wherever you like, as far as this member of the vocal minority is concerned.
 
I do have one small concern regarding the post I've quoted above though. It does sound a little divisive - very "them and us". I don't think that has any place in the Coffee House, especially when this perceived division is reinforced by a forum host.
 
None of the FSF regulars may agree with my recently espoused views regarding the 'copycat' thread titles, but all I did was express an opinion. I never once insisted, or even suggested, that such threads not be posted. I did openly pontificate as to why anyone would find them humorous, I'll concede, but even then, I hope I approached it politely and rationally.
 
Like I said, I consider the Coffee House regulars to be good friends and excellent company, and I'd do anything for you guys if called upon to do so - no questions asked.
 
I'll be honest, thread titles and subject matter are never going to be an important enough issue to dissuade me from coming to the Coffee House and participating and contributing here.
 
I'll be honest though, talk elsewhere of cliques does concern me, and this is why I quoted Reece's post above. If such a sentiment needed expressing, confining its intended readership to this thread's regulars does appear to bolster the 'them and us' position. If I understand what's being said in Reece's post, it's a distinct demarcation between "You guys" and "The vocal minority". What worries me to some extent is that the "You guys" group contains at least two forum hosts, who I would have thought should really be impartial in such matters at the very least, and certainly not proactive in instigating such divisions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:05:47
I'm confused. Am I an "us" or "them"? 
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:11:41
bapu
I'm confused. Am I an "us" or "them"? 


I'm with ewe Bapu......(neither us nor them).
 
Long live FSF!!!
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:18:29
Mesh,
 
we are wee?
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:20:47
Only when I have to go.
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:27:01
SteveStrummerUK
Beagle
Can I be honest with you guys in here for a minute?  I promise just for a minute then we can all go back to our buffoonery.
 
When bapu created this thread I did not like it at all.  In my mind this thread was simply a way to keep some people from complaining about the numerous "buffoonery" threads in the CH; One thread to rule them all, One thread to find them, One thread to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.  more or less...
 
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.
 
ok,...back to your regularly scheduled buffoonery.




To all...
 
Please don't feel you have to "bow to the wishes of the vocal minority".
 
Post what you like, wherever you like, as far as this member of the vocal minority is concerned.
 
I do have one small concern regarding the post I've quoted above though. It does sound a little divisive - very "them and us". I don't think that has any place in the Coffee House, especially when this perceived division is reinforced by a forum host.
 
None of the FSF regulars may agree with my recently espoused views regarding the 'copycat' thread titles, but all I did was express an opinion. I never once insisted, or even suggested, that such threads not be posted. I did openly pontificate as to why anyone would find them humorous, I'll concede, but even then, I hope I approached it politely and rationally.
 
Like I said, I consider the Coffee House regulars to be good friends and excellent company, and I'd do anything for you guys if called upon to do so - no questions asked.
 
I'll be honest, thread titles and subject matter are never going to be an important enough issue to dissuade me from coming to the Coffee House and participating and contributing here.
 
I'll be honest though, talk elsewhere of cliques does concern me, and this is why I quoted Reece's post above. If such a sentiment needed expressing, confining its intended readership to this thread's regulars does appear to bolster the 'them and us' position. If I understand what's being said in Reece's post, it's a distinct demarcation between "You guys" and "The vocal minority". What worries me to some extent is that the "You guys" group contains at least two forum hosts, who I would have thought should really be impartial in such matters at the very least, and certainly not proactive in instigating such divisions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


I'm accused of violating the CoC in the Coffee House openly and by a report ticket for posting a "copycat" thread title, now I'm accused of causing division by forming cliques with a post where I spoke my mind about not wanting to make posts openly any more for fear of persecution.
 
Posts like this are only telling me one thing:  I'm not welcome to post here.
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 10:59:44
Beagle
SteveStrummerUK
Beagle
Can I be honest with you guys in here for a minute?  I promise just for a minute then we can all go back to our buffoonery.
 
When bapu created this thread I did not like it at all.  In my mind this thread was simply a way to keep some people from complaining about the numerous "buffoonery" threads in the CH; One thread to rule them all, One thread to find them, One thread to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.  more or less...
 
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.
 
ok,...back to your regularly scheduled buffoonery.




To all...
 
Please don't feel you have to "bow to the wishes of the vocal minority".
 
Post what you like, wherever you like, as far as this member of the vocal minority is concerned.
 
I do have one small concern regarding the post I've quoted above though. It does sound a little divisive - very "them and us". I don't think that has any place in the Coffee House, especially when this perceived division is reinforced by a forum host.
 
None of the FSF regulars may agree with my recently espoused views regarding the 'copycat' thread titles, but all I did was express an opinion. I never once insisted, or even suggested, that such threads not be posted. I did openly pontificate as to why anyone would find them humorous, I'll concede, but even then, I hope I approached it politely and rationally.
 
Like I said, I consider the Coffee House regulars to be good friends and excellent company, and I'd do anything for you guys if called upon to do so - no questions asked.
 
I'll be honest, thread titles and subject matter are never going to be an important enough issue to dissuade me from coming to the Coffee House and participating and contributing here.
 
I'll be honest though, talk elsewhere of cliques does concern me, and this is why I quoted Reece's post above. If such a sentiment needed expressing, confining its intended readership to this thread's regulars does appear to bolster the 'them and us' position. If I understand what's being said in Reece's post, it's a distinct demarcation between "You guys" and "The vocal minority". What worries me to some extent is that the "You guys" group contains at least two forum hosts, who I would have thought should really be impartial in such matters at the very least, and certainly not proactive in instigating such divisions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


I'm accused of violating the CoC in the Coffee House openly and by a report ticket for posting a "copycat" thread title, now I'm accused of causing division by forming cliques with a post where I spoke my mind about not wanting to make posts openly any more for fear of persecution.
 
Posts like this are only telling me one thing:  I'm not welcome to post here.




"Persecution"?
 
Get a grip man.
 
You're even starting to sound like John.
 
Whatever next, will I be accused of "harassment"?
 
If you want to play the victim/martyr that's fine. No doubt you'll get plenty of sympathy from your buddies. But it doesn't wash with me. If you want to openly operate as a host who doesn't play by the rules when it suits you, and with complete impunity, that's fine too - there's absolutely nothing me or anyone else can do about it. But at least accept responsibility for your hypocrisy and understand that some of us have a right to believe that's unfair.
 
If it didn't mean breaking a confidence, I'd happily list all the people who have contacted me regarding this matter of double standards and other perceived host infractions. The irony being that they wish to remain anonymous and not express their views in public for fear of persecution and retribution by those in authority over them.
 
Answer me this if you'd be so kind Reece - who exactly do you consider to be the "vocal minority"? Me? Paulo? Anyone else? Maybe just for once, think about the non-vocal majority. The one-time regulars who don't bother to speak out, but simply just don't bother to come to the Coffee House anymore. You already know the likes of whom I'm talking about, don't you? Or the friends and acquaintances that have gone completely because of the way certain forum hosts have treated them.
 
None of this will change either until this self-perpetuating denial that anything is actually wrong here is allowed to continue. Don't think for a minute that just because only a "vocal minority" ever have the guts to stand up to you that we are the only people who feel aggrieved. If anything, their continued public silence should be a cause of shame that the current atmosphere around the place makes them feel like they have to keep their opinions to themselves.
 
 
 
 
 
Edit to add: Feel free to PM me if there's anything you'd prefer not to say in here.
Edit 2 - minor correction to make sense
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - 2015/04/30 15:45:11
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby Bert Guy 2015/04/30 15:24:44
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 11:13:57
I have never said I am blameless, but no one is.  not you either. 
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 11:24:50
Beagle
I have never said I am blameless, but no one is.  not you either. 




That's absolutely true.
 
If anything, I've probably committed (and let's be honest - got away with) as many ToS/CoC violations as anyone.
 
 
 
 
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby Bert Guy 2015/04/30 13:55:30
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 11:44:43
Is it time for a ((((((((group hug))))))))) yet??
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 12:14:36
Something that's worth remembering;
 
It's all bollocks.
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
☄ Helpfulby Bert Guy 2015/04/30 13:59:16
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 12:22:37
Steve,
 
Just so you know - from my perspective it's all good. We just disagree about some things. And perhaps agree on many others.
 
But keep in mind that expressing a minority opinion by its very nature tends to make one feel unwelcome. 
 
Which is why many people not named "Drew" are afraid to express them. 
 
I think it's a bit naive to express an opinion that others might profoundly disagree with, and might also implicitly or explicitly criticize people (!), and then not expect a little resentment from some quarters.
 
But again, it's all good from my perspective.
Bert Guy
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 13:55:20
Yes, Drew, its all good
 
Your glass will always be half full, if you wish to see it that way
 
 
Cheers,
 
Bert
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 15:10:11
Bert, I used to live in Vegas for about 25 yrs (grew up there) until I moved to FL. How long have you been there? Do you like it there? 
I used to make some good money on sports betting (actually put me through school for a few yrs). LOL
paulo
Max Output Level: -13 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 15:57:53
Beagle
Can I be honest with you guys in here for a minute?  I promise just for a minute then we can all go back to our buffoonery.
 
When bapu created this thread I did not like it at all.  In my mind this thread was simply a way to keep some people from complaining about the numerous "buffoonery" threads in the CH; One thread to rule them all, One thread to find them, One thread to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.  more or less...
 
it was a "cop-out" to bow to the wishes of the vocal minority...in my opinion. 
 
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  maybe it has become something completely different.
 
but I am beginning to understand a reason to post silliness in here instead of out there now.  it apparently doesn't go well for people when you post something fun in the CH if you're not under the protection of the FSF...because of the vocal minority.
 
ok,...back to your regularly scheduled buffoonery.




It's quite simple - post as much crap / buffoonery as you like. That's what the CH is for IMO, I'm quite capable of ignoring it when it becomes a bit too repetitive for my taste as I'm sure others are, hence why I rarely venture into this thread, but if you and your colleagues are going to dish out threats of bans to people who are only behaving in exactly the same way as you do and seem to enjoy, you can hardly expect them to have any respect for you whatsoever, especially as I seem to remember that you were once quite vocal about the right of everyone to post whatever they like when one of your now colleagues took a swipe at the posters in this forum, something which you choose to ignore when it gets mentioned now for some reason. Please don't start playing the victim here when it is your actions and those of some of your fellow hosts that have caused any bad feeling amongst the members here. With regard to the "vocal minority"  - there may be only a few that actually say anything, but that doesn't mean only those people feel that way, some just don't want to say, dont want to risk being banned for speaking their mind or just choose no to participate any more instead. Frankly, I'm past caring if I get banned or not, so I'll continue to say it how it is and take my chances . Believe it or not, those who speak out are actually not trying to spoil anything, but rather trying to clear out the BS and hopefully return this forum to what it used to be before the needless and hypocritcal nannying ruined it.
 
 
And now back to your usual program.........
 
 
Arse, Becan, Monkeys, Am etc................
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 16:16:42
drewfx1
Steve,
 
Just so you know - from my perspective it's all good. We just disagree about some things. And perhaps agree on many others.
 
But keep in mind that expressing a minority opinion by its very nature tends to make one feel unwelcome. 
 
Which is why many people not named "Drew" are afraid to express them. 
 
I think it's a bit naive to express an opinion that others might profoundly disagree with, and might also implicitly or explicitly criticize people (!), and then not expect a little resentment from some quarters.
 
But again, it's all good from my perspective.




Drew, thanks for that - you talk a lot of sense.
 
My reason for commenting in here today was absolutely not to criticise the people who regularly contribute to this thread, or to cast aspersions about any 'normal' members' (i.e. non-hosts) posting habits. People know what my views are - after all, I certainly espouse them often enough.
 
My concern was that a forum host was deliberately going out of his way to effect a schism between the 'good guys' and the "vocal minority", the latter group into which I've no doubt I would be included. I am prepared to be proved wrong of course, but I see no other possible reason for posting what he posted, specifically in this thread.
 
Another thing I wanted to clarify was that I actually don't believe that it's just a "vocal minority" that have grievances about the Coffee House, about the host system in general, and about certain host's conduct specifically.
 
I fully understand that people come and people go, the point I was making was that quite a few people have left for reasons that are directly to do with the hosts, or directly because of the direction the Coffee House was going in. To deny, or worse, to simply ignore these realities is to show contempt for those who have been affected by these matters.
 
I received a Private Message from a former Coffee House regular after I posted my comments earlier in here. With his permission, I'll happily post word for word what he had to say to me.
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
Re:Bapu's random thoughts for the day.... 2015/04/30 16:20:33

Page: << < ..666667668669670.. > >> Showing page 670 of 1120