Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
calaverasgrandes
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1454
  • Joined: 2005/01/22 17:33:49
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/10 21:40:51 (permalink)
Nerdy nitpick alert.... that's 5.9dB worse than the 144dB theoretical 24bit limit. So it's not impossible... just improbable

uh, I'm talking about EIN figure, which is a standard based on a 200 ohm load. Even with a shorted input 135db EIN is highly unlikely. In the worlds best instrumentation amplifiers you still cant get around little "nitpicking" details like thermal noise.
Either way I prefer not to buy gear from companies that mislead in their adverts. It belies a lack of respect for the customer.

Ps Nerd? well I make music with computers and talk about it online...DUH

Sonar 7.0.3, Mattel Synsonics, Motu 828MKII (BLA), TC-powercore, Stillwell plugins, Moog MG1, Korg Poly 800, DX27s, Moogerfooger Lowpass, Ovation Magnum, Stingray fretless, Mesa Bass 400, Waldorf Edition, DBA fuzz war, Summit 2BA221, etc
#31
wogg
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1819
  • Joined: 2003/11/14 16:07:44
  • Location: Columbus, OH
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/10 22:42:28 (permalink)
uh, I'm talking about EIN figure, which is a standard based on a 200 ohm load. Even with a shorted input 135db EIN is highly unlikely. In the worlds best instrumentation amplifiers you still cant get around little "nitpicking" details like thermal noise.


Hence the liquid nitrogen reference of course... well played sir

You know at first glance it looked like the range was correct to go down to 144... until you actually add the numbers
For an engineering type guy I'm ridiculously bad at simple calculations in my head.

Homepage:
The World of Wogg

#32
Junski
Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1570
  • Joined: 2003/11/10 07:29:13
  • Location: FI
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/11 06:00:58 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: calaverasgrandes

Nerdy nitpick alert.... that's 5.9dB worse than the 144dB theoretical 24bit limit. So it's not impossible... just improbable

uh, I'm talking about EIN figure, which is a standard based on a 200 ohm load. Even with a shorted input 135db EIN is highly unlikely. In the worlds best instrumentation amplifiers you still cant get around little "nitpicking" details like thermal noise.
Either way I prefer not to buy gear from companies that mislead in their adverts. It belies a lack of respect for the customer.

Ps Nerd? well I make music with computers and talk about it online...DUH



ORIGINAL: http://www.rane.com/note145.html
EIN. Equivalent Input Noise or Input Referred Noise

What is tested? Equivalent input noise, or input referred noise, is how noise is spec'd on mixing consoles, standalone mic preamps and other signal processing units with mic inputs. The problem in measuring mixing consoles (and all mic preamps) is knowing ahead of time how much gain is going to be used. The mic stage itself is the dominant noise generator; therefore, the output noise is almost totally determined by the amount of gain: turn the gain up, and the output noise goes up accordingly. Thus, the EIN is the amount of noise added to the input signal. Both are then amplified to obtain the final output signal.

For example, say your mixer has an EIN of -130 dBu. This means the noise is 130 dB below a reference point of 0.775 volts (0 dBu). If your microphone puts out, say, -50 dBu under normal conditions, then the S/N at the input to the mic preamp is 80 dB (i.e., the added noise is 80 dB below the input signal). This is uniquely determined by the magnitude of the input signal and the EIN. From here on out, turning up the gain increases both the signal and the noise by the same amount.

How is it measured? With the gain set for maximum and the input terminated with the expected source impedance, the output noise is measured with an rms voltmeter fitted with a bandwidth or weighting filter.

Required Conditions. This is a spec where test conditions are critical. It is very easy to deceive without them. Since high-gain mic stages greatly amplify source noise, the terminating input resistance must be stated. Two equally quiet inputs will measure vastly different if not using the identical input impedance. The standard source impedance is 150 ohms. As unintuitive as it may be, a plain resistor, hooked up to nothing, generates noise, and the larger the resistor value the greater the noise. It is called thermal noise or Johnson noise (after its discoverer J. B. Johnson, in 1928) and results from the motion of electron charge of the atoms making up the resistor. All that moving about is called thermal agitation (caused by heat -- the hotter the resistor, the noisier).

The input terminating resistor defines the lower limit of noise performance. In use, a mic stage cannot be quieter than the source. A trick which unscrupulous manufacturers may use is to spec their mic stage with the input shorted -- a big no-no, since it does not represent the real performance of the preamp.

The next biggie in spec'ing the EIN of mic stages is bandwidth. This same thermal noise limit of the input terminating resistance is a strong function of measurement bandwidth. For example, the noise voltage generated by the standard 150 ohm input resistor, measured over a bandwidth of 20 kHz (and room temperature) is -131 dBu, i.e., you cannot have an operating mic stage, with a 150 ohm source, quieter than -131 dBu. However, if you use only a 10 kHz bandwidth, then the noise drops to -134 dBu, a big 3 dB improvement. (For those paying close attention: it is not 6 dB like you might expect since the bandwidth is half. It is a square root function, so it is reduced by the square root of one-half, or 0.707, which is 3 dB less).

Since the measured output noise is such a strong function of bandwidth and gain, it is recommended to use no weighting filters. They only complicate comparison among manufacturers. Remember: if a manufacturer's reported EIN seems too good to be true, look for the details. They may not be lying, only using favorable conditions to deceive.

Correct: EIN = -130 dBu, 22 kHz BW, max gain, Rs = 150 ohms

Wrong: EIN = -130 dBu



ORIGINAL: http://www.maxioxd.com/
* Microphone Pre-amp
Type Balanced XLR (+48V Phantom Power support)
Level 500 mV max (-3.8dBu)
Gain Range +25.0dB (@Gain min, -3.8dBu) ~ +73dB (@Gain max, -51.8dBu)
Equivalent Input Noise - 135.5dBu (@ 0 ohm, 20Hz ~ 20kHz)
THD + N 0.00065% A-weighted (@ gain+35dB)
Dynamic Range 103dB A-weighted (@ gain +35dB)
CMRR 90dB
Impedance 1.5K ohm




On MaxIO specs, the EIN 135.5dBu is given @ 0 ohm, 20Hz ~ 20kHz.

How does this make difference compared to standard 150 ohm or 200 ohm 'loads'?

Does this 'error' make MaxIO XD's mic-preamps unusable?


Junski


#33
DonM
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4129
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 12:23:12
  • Location: Pittsburgh
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/17 14:36:53 (permalink)
I do a bunch of live recordings where there are no retakes or second chances so my opinions are biased in that direction. I have had bad experiences with a single device being my pre and my A2D - Examples DM-24, O1X, Traveller - so.... I use preamps and then balanced into these devices - I just finished a very large on-location recording project for NPR and used my MOTU Traveller as the A2D - that works fine with Presonous and O2R preamps in front - my two cents

-D

____________________________________
Check out my new Album  iTunesAmazonCD Baby and recent Filmwork, and Client Release
 
#34
dooleyblu
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2006/02/01 09:49:38
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/20 10:44:24 (permalink)
Frank Coffey wrote
The Presonus Firepod sounds great but has two major flaws, no software mixer for monitoring


I just upgraded to the Firepod from the E-MU 0404 and I am now just finding this out! I have an unusual situation with one of the band members. He is mostly deaf in one ear and the other is hyper sensitive. He needs hi-volume in the right ear and lo-volume in the left. I upgraded to the Firepod so that we can record scratch tracks with the whole band at once. For him, I need to turn down all the other instruments in his headphones -30 Db, the click track needs to be down -70 Db. His vocal and banjo need to be very loud for him. I can make it this way for him by sending the mix signal to another small mixer and change the balance. I have sent the click track to buss A and that is where I can send most of the signal to the deaf ear. The problem is that I cannot turn down the other instruments enough in the monitor mix and send enough signal to their respective tracks. Also, after making it sound this way for him, it sounds like crap for the rest of us. E-MU comes with Patch mix DSP software and I could probably manage this issue much better with it, but it dose not recognize the Firepod.

Dose anyone out there have any suggestions? Is there a piece of software out there to manage this? Can I do this with hardware?

Ant help would be appreciated.

Dooley Blue Studios
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400 - 2-Gig Mem, Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4,
WD 80GB SATA 7200RPM-OS, WD 80GB IDE 7200RPM-Samples, SB 250GB SATA 7200RPM-Audio, E-MU 0404, eVGA 6200, FirePod
Cakewalk Sonar 6.0 Producer/ Adobe Audition 1.5
#35
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11676
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
  • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/20 11:48:39 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: dooleyblu

Frank Coffey wrote
The Presonus Firepod sounds great but has two major flaws, no software mixer for monitoring


I just upgraded to the Firepod from the E-MU 0404 and I am now just finding this out! I have an unusual situation with one of the band members. He is mostly deaf in one ear and the other is hyper sensitive. He needs hi-volume in the right ear and lo-volume in the left. I upgraded to the Firepod so that we can record scratch tracks with the whole band at once. For him, I need to turn down all the other instruments in his headphones -30 Db, the click track needs to be down -70 Db. His vocal and banjo need to be very loud for him. I can make it this way for him by sending the mix signal to another small mixer and change the balance. I have sent the click track to buss A and that is where I can send most of the signal to the deaf ear. The problem is that I cannot turn down the other instruments enough in the monitor mix and send enough signal to their respective tracks. Also, after making it sound this way for him, it sounds like crap for the rest of us. E-MU comes with Patch mix DSP software and I could probably manage this issue much better with it, but it dose not recognize the Firepod.

Dose anyone out there have any suggestions? Is there a piece of software out there to manage this? Can I do this with hardware?

Ant help would be appreciated.



Patch mix and the use of Aux sends and busses in Sonar would solve the problem but the 0404 doesn't have enough I/O to do it. The Emu 1820M or any interface with enough I/O would work. Most interfaces have a zero latency mixer built in and a software like Patch mix DSP to adjust it, the Firepod is the only expensive one I know of that can't do that. M-Audio, E-MU, MOTU, Lynx all have similar mixers so you can get more then one headphone mix going at once. Keep in mind this can't be done with just software at zero latency, the hardware has to have a DSP matrix mixer built in and only the software from that vendor will be able to control it and each one looks and works different.

The idea would be to use two headphone amps or the built in amp for one person and a multi channel headphone amp for the rest of the band. With an interface that has a DSP mixer you could then solve both problems. You would use the DSP mixer to send a "copy" of each input to two different output pairs and be able to adjust the levels of each channel on each output pair independently. That takes care of live monitoring on inputs with zero latency.

Then you can also add an Aux send to each channel in Sonar and send that to a bus that is assigned to the second pair of outputs also and use those to adjust the playback mix for the special needs person and use the main mix set to the first pair for the rest of the band. With enough outputs and headphone amps you could even give each player their own mix !

Many people ask why some audio interfaces have so many outputs and this is a great example of how they can be used. The firepod would have been perfect but they cheaped out and didn't put enough DSP power in the thing to be able to mix all that I/O. They need to update it with the latest chips that can do that (and better conversion) and discontinue the firepod. Can you say firepod II ? Folks already love the sound and design of that thing they just need to get it the rest of the way there.

Until then.. check out Focusrite, Mackie, MOTU, RME, M-Audio, etc and see what you can find. Even the tried and true, old antique, M-Audio Delta 1010 would work perfect.
post edited by ohhey - 2006/04/20 12:07:17
#36
dooleyblu
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2006/02/01 09:49:38
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/24 09:43:11 (permalink)
Thank you for your reply, I have come up with a solution for my friend. Fortunately, the Firepod has an SPDIF output of which I ran to my SPDIF input of the E-MU 0404. Now I can create a send for each channel to him through the E-MU and set the balance and level independent of what the rest of us hear from the Firepod. I am thankful I came up with this because I do like the simplicity and the price of the Firepod.

Dooley Blue Studios
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400 - 2-Gig Mem, Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4,
WD 80GB SATA 7200RPM-OS, WD 80GB IDE 7200RPM-Samples, SB 250GB SATA 7200RPM-Audio, E-MU 0404, eVGA 6200, FirePod
Cakewalk Sonar 6.0 Producer/ Adobe Audition 1.5
#37
OffAnAirplane
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1386
  • Joined: 2005/05/12 13:25:26
  • Location: Houston, TX
  • Status: offline
RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/24 10:08:04 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: ohhey
Many people ask why some audio interfaces have so many outputs and this is a great example of how they can be used. The firepod would have been perfect but they cheaped out and didn't put enough DSP power in the thing to be able to mix all that I/O. They need to update it with the latest chips that can do that (and better conversion) and discontinue the firepod. Can you say firepod II ? Folks already love the sound and design of that thing they just need to get it the rest of the way there.


Exactly. I've got all eight analog outs of my 2408Mk3 going to the four stereo channels of my headphone amp. Between Motu-Cuemix and Aux sends in Sonar, I can make four entirely different stereo headphone mixes. I can satisfy the monitoring needs of even the pickiest bands.
post edited by OffAnAirplane - 2006/04/24 10:16:00

Rom 8:18 For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us.
#38
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1