Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
dwhite
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2003/11/14 11:45:42
  • Status: offline
2006/03/20 20:42:07 (permalink)

Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording

I've been using Cakewalk Sonar since Pro Audio 9. I've used the software by creating many MIDI tracks and recording my audio tracks one at a time (e.g. vocals, acoustic guitar, saxophone, etc.).

I have a jazz band that I want to record in my basement studio, but obviously my older Echo Audio Darla-24 is not good enough to record an entire band. The Darla-24 only has 2 inputs and I need to preserve separate audio tracks to do a proper mix of the band. Therefore, I'm looking to buy a new audio interface and I need advice on what to buy.

I need a minimum of 8 simultaneous input channels (keys, bass, sax, gtr, kick, snare, toms, overhead). Does it matter whether I use Firewire (IEEE) or PCI? Hard-disk space is going to be eaten-up quickly therefore I should probably buy a dedicated audio hard drive. Does it make a difference in terms of latency or performance whether or not the drive is external (through USB) or internal?

Please give me audio setup recommendations. I've had no problems with Echo Audio, therefore I'm inclined to use them. I see many recommendations for MOTU products. However, I've also heard their products are only good for Macs and the Windows drivers are terrible.

Thanks...

Dave White
#1

37 Replies Related Threads

    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/20 23:01:22 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: dwhite

    I've been using Cakewalk Sonar since Pro Audio 9. I've used the software by creating many MIDI tracks and recording my audio tracks one at a time (e.g. vocals, acoustic guitar, saxophone, etc.).

    I have a jazz band that I want to record in my basement studio, but obviously my older Echo Audio Darla-24 is not good enough to record an entire band. The Darla-24 only has 2 inputs and I need to preserve separate audio tracks to do a proper mix of the band. Therefore, I'm looking to buy a new audio interface and I need advice on what to buy.

    I need a minimum of 8 simultaneous input channels (keys, bass, sax, gtr, kick, snare, toms, overhead). Does it matter whether I use Firewire (IEEE) or PCI? Hard-disk space is going to be eaten-up quickly therefore I should probably buy a dedicated audio hard drive. Does it make a difference in terms of latency or performance whether or not the drive is external (through USB) or internal?

    Please give me audio setup recommendations. I've had no problems with Echo Audio, therefore I'm inclined to use them. I see many recommendations for MOTU products. However, I've also heard their products are only good for Macs and the Windows drivers are terrible.

    Thanks...

    Dave White



    There are a lot of folks that use the M-Audio Delta 1010 and seem to have good luck with it in Sonar. I'm sure the Echo would be good also, e-mail them and see if they have done any testing with Sonar with the new ones. The RME Fireface is the best firewire one but $$$$. The Presonus Firepod sounds great but has two major flaws, no software mixer for monitoring and doesn't autoswtich sample rates like a normal sound card. Some folks are having good luck with the Mackie 400f but some have a few problems, it's kinda new and some bugs might take a while to find and fix. Some folks like the MOTUs some don't, maybe a few will pipe in.
    #2
    bmxplosive
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 369
    • Joined: 2004/12/20 12:40:38
    • Location: Atlanta, GA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/20 23:12:48 (permalink)
    I really like my Motu 896 HD, which has 8 analog inputs and ADAT optical input/output. All XLR inputs, and I don't use a physical mixer, so it's perfect for me. I just run a snake to XLR cables and then the cables right into the microphones. I've had no problems from the drivers either, and I'm on Windows XP. It's running really solid. The 896HD is firewire, so I had to get a firewire card, but that was only about $15. I also have a Focusrite Octopre hooked up via the optical input, and I'm having no problems with sync, etc.

    Swaff
    post edited by bmxplosive - 2006/03/20 23:32:50
    #3
    Junski
    Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1570
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 07:29:13
    • Location: FI
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 01:44:53 (permalink)
    ESI MaXiO XD (1600$) Audio/Midi Rack Unit with PC Interface.










    This ESI 'system' is equipped with the best converters available from AKM, and the RMAA results just seems excellent.

    Specifications - EX8000;
    - High quality 24bit 192kHz ADC; 123dB Dynamic range
    - High quality 24bit 192kHz DAC; 120dB Dynamic range
    - E.D.I connector
    - Ultra low noise MIC pre-amp
    - Sample rate : 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, 192 kHz
    - +48V Phantom Power supply
    - 10 step LED Peak meter (for every channel)
    - Analog Input: 8 XLR (Combo) Connector(+4dBu/-10dBV)
    - Insert : 8x1/4" Phone jack
    - Analog Output: 8x TRS/XLR bal connector(+4dBu/-10dBV)
    - Headphone Amplifier
    - 8ch Digital I/O: AES/EBU & Coaxial support upto 24-bit/192kHz
    - ADAT I/O, S/MUX, Word Clock Input via BNC connector

    - PCI host Card;
    - 32bit PCI Interface : PCI Bus-Mastering support
    - Full Duplex - Simultaneous Record/Playback
    - 32ch In/32ch Out, 24bit 192kHz Audio Stream I/O
    - 4 Port E.D.I connectors and 1 port M.D.I connector
    - Hardware Input monitoring
    - 192kHz SPDI/F Coaxial Digital I/O
    - 1In/1Out, 16 channel MIDI
    - PCI slot compatibility - designed to suit for +3.3V and/or +5V PCI slot
    - supports EWDM driver: MME/WDM, DirectSound, ASIO 2.0, GSIF 2.0
    - Windows®XP/2000 compatible


    More information can be found from MaXIOXD.COM.


    In low-price category, Hercules 16/12 FW has least lot of functionality and properties included.




    Reviews:
    http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb05/articles/hercules1612fw.htm
    http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/02/10/hercules_16/index.html


    Junski
    post edited by Junski - 2007/02/07 10:39:06


    #4
    OffAnAirplane
    Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1386
    • Joined: 2005/05/12 13:25:26
    • Location: Houston, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 08:15:21 (permalink)
    PCI vs. Firewire will make some difference, but either will work fine.

    You're right about the dedicated hard drive. That would help a lot. Some people hate USB, but I've used them before and they worked fine.

    Windows drivers for MOTU are rock solid, in my experience. I've used the 896HD, 828Mk2 and currently using the 2408Mk3. They've all been great.

    The 896HD would be good if you don't already have an external mixer or 8 preamps. But if you don't mind spending a little more, an 828Mk2 and an 8-channel preamp would give you a lot more flexibility. Because you would have 8 mic inputs and 8 line inputs, whereas with the 896HD you would only have 8 mic/line inputs. Don't know if you need that many inputs or not. Something to think about though.

    Rom 8:18 For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us.
    #5
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 09:12:06 (permalink)
    There are a lot of good potential choices.
    Each having relative strengths/weaknesses.

    These all work well
    - Emu1820m
    - M-Audio Firewire 1814
    - Echo Layla 3G
    - RME - Anything

    If attaining 1.5ms latency isn't the largest factor in your decision, the Emu 1820m's fidelity is really hard to beat (120dB dynamic range).
    RME, Echo, and M-Audio are all rock-solid and roughly equal to each other (fidelity wise - meaning A/D D/A).
    The Firewire 1814 is portable... works well with Sonar... and allows you to also run M-Powered ProTools.

    You really can't make a bad decision with any of the above.
    I'd focus on the features/connections/etc that will best fit your specific scenario.
    (Make a list of things you must have... things you want to have... etc)

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #6
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 09:45:35 (permalink)
    HI,

    listed by quality last being best

    Emu
    M-Audio
    Presonus
    RME
    RME FIreface

    NO Echo, the older stuff they made was great, i am not fond of the new at all.

    Scott
    ADK
    #7
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 10:07:17 (permalink)



    NO Echo, the older stuff they made was great, i am not fond of the new at all.



    Echo is a particularly bad choice if using an A8V Deluxe mobo... ;-)
    As in... it won't work.

    Otherwise, I've had good luck with them.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #8
    jpkeys
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 356
    • Joined: 2004/02/06 13:19:00
    • Location: New Jersey
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 10:45:50 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: ohhey
    The Presonus Firepod sounds great but has two major flaws, no software mixer for monitoring and doesn't autoswtich sample rates like a normal sound card.

    I've posted here before that my Firepod auto-switches just fine between 44.1 and 48. I've had mixed results with higher sample rates; sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. But since 44.1 and 48 are the only rates I typically use, it's no problem for me. Also, with my system I can track as low as 1.5 ms, so input monitoring is almost as good as a software mixer (and to me simpler to use). If you want 8 decent mic preamps in an interface at a reasonable price, the Firepod is hard to beat. And it's absolutely great for a portable laptop-based recording solution. I record 10 simultaneous tracks (8 analog + 2 digital) at gigs weekly.

    JP
    #9
    oddboy
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 130
    • Joined: 2005/11/29 04:11:12
    • Location: The U of K
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 11:09:04 (permalink)
    Hi there,
    I've used a DSP24 from ST audio / Hoontech for many years with few problems if any. It's cheap as chips, too with a 8in and 8out breakout. They've subsequently released a full on XLR breakout box. It's worth a look although some people have had problems I've found it to be Sonar friendly.
    Oddly,
    Oddboy
    #10
    dali lama
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 448
    • Joined: 2005/12/14 16:48:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 11:37:49 (permalink)
    I'll second that Firepod. In fact, I've had better performance with the pod than with my current Fireface 800, in terms of latency. The Pod was giving me 3ms without probs and the FF800 is more like 10 without trouble. Granted, I've been busy and haven't had a lot of time to troubleshoot and I'm sure that I will get it dialed-in, but the pod was great sounding and really easy to set up and use. And that thing was less than half of what the FF800 cost. I'm not saying that the FF800 is too expensive, I'm more saying that the Firepod is stupid cheap. You can't lose with that box. Don't get me wrong here, if you have the scratch, the FF800 is the way to go. But for the money, you can't beat the pod.
    #11
    dali lama
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 448
    • Joined: 2005/12/14 16:48:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/21 11:42:15 (permalink)
    I've also heard a rumor that the firepod and it's sample rate switching problems are SONAR specific. There seems to be people using that unit with other apps that have no problem switching rates on the fly. Even someone here has reported sucessful sample rate switching on the fly. In fact, I've had trouble switching sample rates on the fly with the FF800, FWIW.
    #12
    calaverasgrandes
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1454
    • Joined: 2005/01/22 17:33:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/24 16:24:08 (permalink)
    I'd say the Motu 828mkII is pretty decent. Second only to the FF800. Some of us have had problems with drivers. Me especially when trying to use an extra multiport midi interface concurrently with the 828's audio ins. But for flexibilty and input/outputs its hard to beat with 20 ins and 22 outs plus a routable mixer with savable presets. The sound quality is very good. But MOTU doesnt publish specs on this model so I cant give you specifics.

    Sonar 7.0.3, Mattel Synsonics, Motu 828MKII (BLA), TC-powercore, Stillwell plugins, Moog MG1, Korg Poly 800, DX27s, Moogerfooger Lowpass, Ovation Magnum, Stingray fretless, Mesa Bass 400, Waldorf Edition, DBA fuzz war, Summit 2BA221, etc
    #13
    johndale
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3228
    • Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
    • Location: Red Bluff, California
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 00:25:40 (permalink)
    Can anyone say Lynx or Sydek? Both fine cards. EMU quality? whatever................................
    #14
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 04:20:45 (permalink)
    John,
    I understand you had a bad experience with the 1820m...
    But it's been working well for a lot of other folks.
    The quality of the A/D D/A is definitely better than a lot of competitors.
    (ie: Noisefloor is 12dB lower than what you'll find on M-Audio/Echo/etc.)

    Having said this, if your primary concern is ultra low latency performance (<3ms), then the 1820m is not the best choice.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #15
    lhansen
    Max Output Level: -27.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4765
    • Joined: 2005/09/21 09:02:33
    • Location: CT, USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 10:47:57 (permalink)
    Using a MOTU Traveler with WDM drivers and is running fine with no glitches, low latency, ultra-quiet. Best Interface I've used so far. I have a decent SIIG II firewire card as well. Once installed and configured, I was good to go. I can pay attention to the music!!


    Slow Marching Band


    Win 7 x64, Sonar X1E x64, Studio One v2, Focusrite Saffire 24 DSP Pro, Genelec 8030a, True Systems P-Solo, Focusrite ISA One, FMR RNP, GAP-73. 

    "Someone to watch over me".
    #16
    BruceEnnis
    Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1665
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 16:48:01
    • Location: Maryland
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 10:57:12 (permalink)
    listed by quality last being best

    Emu
    M-Audio
    Presonus
    RME
    RME FIreface


    Also forgotten from the list would be

    Tascam FW-1884
    Frontier Design Dakota and WaveCenter
    Digi 002 and 002 Rack (free copy of ProTools LE with purchase)

    Bruce Ennis
    Studio
    #17
    Clydewinder
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 941
    • Joined: 2005/02/28 22:34:40
    • Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 13:00:12 (permalink)
    the m-audio delta 1010 is rock solid if you are looking to go PCI

    #18
    jo099
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 64
    • Joined: 2006/02/13 22:14:04
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/26 14:09:32 (permalink)
    Those digi'sman (001 or 002), they can't seem to shake a rather "dull" sound for some reason. I've given them more than a fair shot.

    Hmm, from what you're describing...
    Another vote for the delta 1010 (not so much for the "LT" version with cvrtrs on the card, but even with that you could get by).

    I've used them (two 1010's now) in a home studio situation and i've yet to see a product/need to replace them. Just solid 24/44.1khz or 24/96khz i/o.
    Drivers are solid, monitoring made easy, excellent sound. it should cover a lot of situations...and the price is right.

    I'm not a fan of firewire interfaces though.
    post edited by jo099 - 2006/03/26 14:20:00
    #19
    dali lama
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 448
    • Joined: 2005/12/14 16:48:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/27 12:04:39 (permalink)
    Why not firewire?
    #20
    calaverasgrandes
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1454
    • Joined: 2005/01/22 17:33:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/27 13:32:09 (permalink)
    Can anyone say Lynx or Sydek? Both fine cards. EMU quality?

    I've heard of Lynx, but Sydek? Never heard of em. Do you mean Sytek the preamp company? As far as the EMU. There is more to an interface than specs. Some interfaces with not so good specs sound great. Some interfaces with very good noise figures have very bumpy frequency response. And the best converters are nothing if the analog cicuitry in front of them is junk.
    I am leary of the EMU gear just because of the way the ads pitch them. They come off kind of cheesy. Sure EMU was a synth company for years, but that doesnt mean they know dirt about making a good interface. Heck Lexicon couldnt get the Core 2 to work. It sounded great for the 5 minutes before the BSOD!

    Sonar 7.0.3, Mattel Synsonics, Motu 828MKII (BLA), TC-powercore, Stillwell plugins, Moog MG1, Korg Poly 800, DX27s, Moogerfooger Lowpass, Ovation Magnum, Stingray fretless, Mesa Bass 400, Waldorf Edition, DBA fuzz war, Summit 2BA221, etc
    #21
    Jesse G
    Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4282
    • Joined: 2004/04/14 01:43:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/28 14:05:44 (permalink)
    Save some money, get a presonus Firepod. You can record 8 channels at a time. If you dont change sample rates, then it works. O only use 44,100 so, hey, I am happy. I have multiple outs and canhave plenty of Monitor Mixes or head phone mixes as well from withing Sonar. I use the thee isa Cue mix section jsut for a head phome amp.

    Musician friends on-line has a nice deal going on. ~~> Firepod with Free item Buy a Firepod and get a Free Maxrack Product of your choice! (TUBEPre, Comp16, EQ3B, HP4)







    It's agreat product and not too expensive.

    Ohhey, I know you are secretly using the firepod

    Peace
    post edited by Jesse G - 2006/03/28 17:55:19

    Peace,
    Jesse G. A fisher of men  <><
    ==============================
    Cakewalk and I are going places together!

    Cakewalk By Bandlab, Windows 10 Pro- 64 bit, Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI, Intel Core i5-4460 Haswell Processor, Crucial Ballistix 32 GB Ram, PNY GeForce GTX 750, Roland Octa-Capture, Mackie Big Knob, Mackie Universal Controller (MCU), KRK V4's, KRK Rockit 6, Korg TR-61 Workstation, M-Audio Code 49 MIDI keyboard controller.[/
    #22
    Plyrman
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1062
    • Joined: 2006/03/07 12:48:30
    • Location: Chicago, IL
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/03/28 14:25:17 (permalink)
    Funny I asked almost the same question inside the Sonar forum....

    But what are you guys thoughts on the Tascam 1082 or 1804. It's suppose to run well with Sonar and the prices are reasonable.....plus you get the "8 inputs"....????

    Also...advantage/disavantage of USB vs Firewire.....using M-Audio Firewire 410 now....it works fine....but only "2 inputs" ....???
    post edited by Plyrman - 2006/03/28 17:01:29

    Mike G.
    Sonar X3 Custom Build: IntelCore2Quad, 16 gig Ram, Asus Z87-Plus, Internal 200GB SATA HDD (1) 320GB SATA HDD (2), Motif Rack, Roland Juno-G, Trigger Finger, Keystation 88, Tascam FW1082, JBL 4328's
    #23
    shotgunndunn
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6
    • Joined: 2003/12/09 18:59:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/01 18:44:23 (permalink)
    I have a MOTU 896 Firewire Interface on ebay right now. I used it flawlessly with Sonar for over 2 years.
    #24
    jo099
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 64
    • Joined: 2006/02/13 22:14:04
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/02 17:14:38 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: dali lama

    Why not firewire?



    Usage and Reliability. Pci has it over Firewire I/O devices. I need to be able to record 16 trks at a time sometimes in 24/44.1 or 96, Low latency softsynth/samps, ability to utilize MME drivers "and" asio at the same time (for certain scenarios). There's always some limitation or problems when we talk fwire wth anything nominally demanding.
    Firewire devices work fine for most project studios , anything demanding though and f-wire becomes a liability or concern.


    Plus I keep my f-wire channels open for other purposes (video devices, etc.). If you're just in your apartment recording 6-8trks at a time, sure...go firewire. I'm not interested in it.
    #25
    Spaceduck
    Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2499
    • Joined: 2004/12/29 12:51:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/04 19:06:21 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: jcschild

    NO Echo, the older stuff they made was great, i am not fond of the new at all.


    The old Echo Layla 24/96 was as good as it gets, and I still think it's possibly the best card on the market today. Funny it's gotta be 5 years old by now. Why they messed with a great design I'll never know. Anyway, dwhite, you can probably get yourself a Layla 24/96 on ebay for around $300.
    #26
    dali lama
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 448
    • Joined: 2005/12/14 16:48:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/04 22:07:17 (permalink)
    I'd hate to think you're right, jo099. But I think you are.
    #27
    deiseldave
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 225
    • Joined: 2004/05/20 10:57:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/10 14:58:35 (permalink)
    Delta 1010 has worked great for me for over 5 years without a hickup. IMO, any investment into higher quality converters is wasted money. The Delta's are already ridiculously accurate. You can spend over $10K and still not get a 1% improvement in accuracy of reproduction, and any miniscule improvements realised would be negated by human hearing limitations.
    #28
    calaverasgrandes
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1454
    • Joined: 2005/01/22 17:33:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/10 16:28:51 (permalink)
    regarding the ESI MaXiO XD. First it foes fro $2000 according to their online store. That price puts it firmly into Apogee/RME territory. 2nd it state an EIN of 135.5! thats uh 5.9db better than the theoretical limit! Wow they must have liquid nitrogen in those preamps!
    I use an ESI midi interface in my setup. It runs fine but I am a little skittish about the driver. Its version 1.0 still and its 2 years old! So either these guys write the best drivers in the world, or they dont give a shoot about their products after they are out of the warehouse.

    Sonar 7.0.3, Mattel Synsonics, Motu 828MKII (BLA), TC-powercore, Stillwell plugins, Moog MG1, Korg Poly 800, DX27s, Moogerfooger Lowpass, Ovation Magnum, Stingray fretless, Mesa Bass 400, Waldorf Edition, DBA fuzz war, Summit 2BA221, etc
    #29
    wogg
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1819
    • Joined: 2003/11/14 16:07:44
    • Location: Columbus, OH
    • Status: offline
    RE: Best Audio Interface for 8-Channel Input Recording 2006/04/10 16:33:35 (permalink)
    2nd it state an EIN of 135.5! thats uh 5.9db better than the theoretical limit!


    Nerdy nitpick alert.... that's 5.9dB worse than the 144dB theoretical 24bit limit. So it's not impossible... just improbable

    Homepage:
    The World of Wogg

    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1