Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
Well, I'm almost done with my song. I figure if I work weekends I can wrap it up in 6 more months or so. I'm a little embarrassed to post it here because it's so ragged and only has a scratch vocal on it. Oh well, it is what it is. I'll probably end up deleting it and starting from scratch.... again. Just about everything except the vocal is doubled (sextupled?) several times. I sang and played guitar. All other instruments are Cakewalk soft synths playing parts I wrote in the PRV. Comments welcome. http://www.soundclick.com...9182&content=music
|
RobertB
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11256
- Joined: 2005/11/19 23:40:50
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/02 15:32:22
(permalink)
I like the overall concept. I might be inclined to lose the portamento synth at the intro. It seems to set us up for a completely different song. Bass line has a nice drive to it. Guitar tone is cool, but there were some places where I was expecting you to let it rip. The piano has some unrealized potential to kick it up some, too. You might want to play with some compressors. This would sound really good with a bit more punch and drama. This would be a good road song. It's a little on the long side, but that could be ok if you take advantage of the cues where it wants to ramp up. Keep working it, and increase the voltage. This has plenty of potential.
My Soundclick Page SONAR Professional, X3eStudio,W7 64bit, AMD Athlon IIx4 2.8Ghz, 4GB RAM, 64bit, AKAI EIE Pro, Nektar Impact LX61,Alesis DM6,Alesis ControlPad,Yamaha MG10/2,Alesis M1Mk2 monitors,Samson Servo300,assorted guitars,Lava Lamp Shimozu-Kushiari or Bob
|
lhansen
Max Output Level: -27.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4765
- Joined: 2005/09/21 09:02:33
- Location: CT, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/03 11:21:25
(permalink)
I like the composition and all the playing! Bass line is fantastic!The synths reminds me of ELP in spots.. (especially that 'moog-type' lead)has that 70's concept vibe. Nice to hear something like this. You said it was a 'rough mix' and I hope you take it to the next level. Crunchy guitar chords and searing leads would be a nice addition to this. It's a long song, so, I think by creating/adjusting the dynamics thru-out (volume, textures, subtle addition of various instruments, to keep it 'beefy' would make this shine even more. My 2 cents worth. I think this tune is worth it!
Slow Marching Band Win 7 x64, Sonar X1E x64, Studio One v2, Focusrite Saffire 24 DSP Pro, Genelec 8030a, True Systems P-Solo, Focusrite ISA One, FMR RNP, GAP-73. "Someone to watch over me".
|
BIABDude
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 676
- Joined: 2010/01/24 20:32:32
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/03 13:35:14
(permalink)
+ + + 1 great playing - - - cool synth sound
|
radio
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2782
- Joined: 2006/11/05 17:04:13
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/03 14:14:51
(permalink)
I like where this song is going but the mix needs to be worked on , the drum track isn't loud enough in the mix and theres a few other areas of concern too . I would start with the mix and see where you end up , the song is worth working on . Radio
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/03 15:22:47
(permalink)
Thank you all for listening and commenting. RobertB, I hear what you're saying about the portamento bit in the beginning but, conceptually, I'd have a hard time taking that out. The song is a metaphor for love and how it starts, changes, evolves, grows. How the people in love change and grow together. So what that beginning represents is the initial attraction that quickly evolves into something very different. Musically, you may be right on the money about how it doesn't fit but it says something I need it to say. No doubt I could have done it better. The only compression I added was while bouncing the project to a track. I put the Sonitus Multiband Compressor in the Master Bus using one of the presets. Then I bounced it again using a different preset. Then I mixed the two together. That's what I posted. It was a spur of the moment thing and resulted in some sounds being more buried and some more upfront, like the bass. I like the way it made the tune punchier but next time I'm going to spend a lot more time tweaking the different bands before I'm finished. Like many things I do, I did it just to see what happened when I did it. I know it's long. I left room at the end to put a guitar solo outro on it but never was able to add something I liked. Sadly for me, my playing just isn't what it used to be. Almost 20 years ago I had a work related accident and just about chopped my left hand in half. I didn't even touch a guitar for several years after that and I never did get back to where I was happy with my playing. I put two synth solos at the end because each represents a person in that relationship. How they are growing together but still remaining individuals. lhansen, I have some crunchy guitar stuff in there but they are so buried in the mix you can't hear them. I will certainly try to change that the next time I work on that project. I need to take some time off from it... maybe write a song about my cat or something. All my synth stuff is heavily influenced by ELP. I'm a lucky man indeed that some of that came across in my work. I'm not really capable of searing leads anymore so I try to come up with something melodic or textural. The first little guitar solo in the song is doubled by three synths. I played the solo then went back and transcribed it in the PRV, then layered the synths under it. It's a subtle thing but that's what I was aiming at. BIABDude, I'm very glad you liked it. The synth sounds were mostly Pentagon 1, Dimension LE and Dreamstation layered together. It's been so long since I put those parts together I can't remember much more about them. I certainly enjoy writing synth parts the more I do it. Radio, I agree with everything you posted. I hear SO many things in it I want to change, adjust, redo, etc. I have a LOT of percussion going on and most of it is buried. I need to spend a lot more time playing with envelopes before it will sound the way I want it to sound.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/03 16:24:29
(permalink)
I liked it. Into was maybe too long. If you cut in half it would not be a bad thing. Guitars could be brighter. I think I heard a synth bass patch early in the song that did not "fit". Too 80's, IMHO. Drums could be a bit more upfront with the bass.
|
Bob Oister
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2766
- Joined: 2008/01/10 00:34:27
- Location: Scranton, Pennsylvania USA
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/04 04:16:25
(permalink)
Hey, This is a really cool song with lots of great stuff scattered throughout the entire eight minutes! I really like the choices that you made with the different synths and textures, and also the piano parts and cool bass lines. It's definitely got a bit of an ELP/Ambrosia vibe going on. The scratch vocals sound good, and I think they'll really shine with a few harmony parts added in a couple of places. I do agree that maybe the drums could come up a little bit in the dense mix, but that may just be my personal taste. Nice work, can't wait to hear it when it's finished. Have a good one! Bob
|
darylcrowley
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2700
- Joined: 2006/10/16 14:25:47
- Location: Ludington, Michigan
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/04 19:00:21
(permalink)
A gem in the rough. Some great potential here. I little omph on the vocals would be my first change and some great suggestions above. Don't be self-depreciating - it just gets in the way. You have some good strenghts here, just develop them and always think "I kick ass", be humble but confident. You're off to a really good start. Daryl
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/06 23:20:39
(permalink)
bapu, I'm glad you liked it. yes, it is a long song but that is how I hear it. If I wanted to make it more marketable I would consider making several changes, including making the song shorter. But since it is 100% a vanity project I don't think I'll be cutting it down. There's a lot I want to do with the guitar tracks yet. For sure they are going to be louder. I have many guitar tracks layered (I think there's about 20 guitars playing the harmonies) and I think they were turned down so I could focus on other issues. Drums will be coming up. Bass will be dropping down a bit. Bob Oister, I am very pleased that my efforts to scatter a lot of stuff around in the song were noticed. Sadly, I can't do much with the piano part because that Midi track is long gone and I'm left to deal with the bounced tracks. I'm still having a hard time getting the bass sound I want. I want it to be a driving force in the song without being overpowering. I struggle to find a balance. Unless I dig out my old Korg ih harmonizer I'm stuck with my solo vocal. I just can't hit the high notes anymore. I think we all agree that the drums need to come up. That will be my final edit, I think. I write, and automate, the percussion around everything else. And there's sooo much percussion going on. 4 snare tracks, 4 tom tom tracks, a Surdo track, 2 tympani tracks, an altered pitch woodblock, and more. I may be in over my head on this one. I'm working on another song now and I plan on keeping it a lot simpler. If I can. Sometime the power of the DAW overcomes me and I just can't stop adding stuff. There isn't anyone looking over my shoulder saying "WTF are you doing??" so off I go. darylcrowley, Oh, for sure I plan on doing a better vocal. That's just something I threw down to write the other parts around. I don't try to be self-deprecating, just honest. A man should know his limitations. I can't sing as well as I used to and can't play guitar nearly as good as I used to. That's not humility, that's a fact. And it's very frustrating. I do take pride in lots of things I do, I just don't brag about them. I proved anything I needed to prove a long time ago.
|
philz
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2462
- Joined: 2004/04/11 13:50:46
- Location: Shrewsbury, PA, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/08 17:56:23
(permalink)
Well, you already got some great advice here. I liked the song and the outro was really great. Could be my taste personally, but I'd be more inclined to have some of that fine synth work breaking up the middle of the tune. At 8 minutes it's pretty long for pop. The vocals are a bit pitchy at times, and it sort of sounds like you're not quite sure of yourself in spots. Just let it rip (vocally) and get some emotion in there (I think this is maybe what Daryl was getting at with the 'more oomph' comment). Keep working it, you've got a great start here.
|
Janet
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8094
- Joined: 2010/01/02 19:04:11
- Location: Missouri
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/08 20:00:21
(permalink)
Great song! I like the synth in the intro too, and see why you want to keep it. Perhaps if you'd work it in during the rest of the song (or at least the first verse), it wouldn't seem so disjointed from the rest of the song. I love the bass part. And the guitars are great. You didn't really delete the midi piano part, did you? If you're ever tempted to do that again, remember that takes hardly any space on your HD. :) Just leave it, then you can edit to your heart's content. :) Nice work!
|
geeare1
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1906
- Joined: 2008/06/17 22:57:36
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/10 11:29:31
(permalink)
Nice song! I've got a really short attention span but there's enough going on here to hold my attention for the entire 8 minutes You don't need any more mix advice ( certainly not from me! ) but you've got a great start here.
|
Tap
Max Output Level: -30 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4536
- Joined: 2008/10/09 11:55:30
- Location: Newburyport, MA
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/10 18:10:26
(permalink)
Like many here, I like the Motif going on in this. Very cool vibe. Just clean up the mix, this will work!
MC4 - M-Audio FW410 / Behringer UCA202 - Fender Strat / Jazzmaster / DuoSonic / Washburn / Peavy Foundation M-Audio Radium 49 Roland Juno 106 / JazzChorus / Seymore Duncan Convertible - HP A1230N ( AMD Athalon 3800+ 2G Ram + 200G HD ) http://soundclick.com/cut2thechaise
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/15 11:06:12
(permalink)
philz, Thanks for your positive comments. I know what you mean about breaking up the middle of the tune. I'm hoping that the harmony guitars can do that when I bring them up a bit. For sure the vocal is pitchy. I very rarely sing anymore and when I did that it was very late and night and I was worried about scaring my next door neighbor in the apartment next door. Hopefully the final version will turn out better. Janet, I can see why that synth part can seem so out of place, but in my mind that's what I want. Everything in the song is a metaphor for stages of a relationship. Many relationships start out as one thing and quickly turn into something else. That synth bit represents that. Musically, it may not fit the rest of the song but artistically, it does exactly what I want it to do. I guess I could make the song longer and add it to the end. Sort of a rebirth of the relationship after years of growing together and, maybe, a little too comfortable and familiar. But, alas, the song is just the right length to suit me right now. I know I'll redo the song from scratch one of these days when I get better equipment and plug-ins so I will keep your, and the other commenters, suggestions in mind when I do that. I have been working on this song for over a year and I have deleted everything and started from scratch 3 times. I'm petty happy with the way this one turned out so apart from fixing the mix and tweaking a few things this is pretty much how this version is going to sound. Geeare1. thanks a lot. For sure I've been given some very interesting advice that I will be abler to use now, and in future incarnations of the song. I hope when I bring up other aspects of the song it be even easier to listen to. Tap, I'm glad you liked it. I don't think anyone will ever like it as much as I do but, for sure, my goal is to make it musically interesting while still telling the story I want to tell. Cleaning up this mix is definitely a chore because there is so much going on, including a lot that can't be easily heard in this mix. I hope the next mixdown will better represent the sound I want.
|
equality
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 716
- Joined: 2007/01/20 19:55:57
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 15:02:54
(permalink)
Great composition, arrangement and playing. Nice transition to the rock and roll parts which are illustrative. Perhaps a bit more volume on the vocal and less quantification on the piano.
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 15:18:02
(permalink)
equality Great composition, arrangement and playing. Nice transition to the rock and roll parts which are illustrative. Perhaps a bit more volume on the vocal and less quantification on the piano. Well, there isn't much I can do about the piano part. I wrote that all out in the PRV and did spend some time manually moving notes around so it didn't sound so mechanical and I didn't keep the piano midi track after I bounced it to an audio track. The piano track is actually several piano/electric piano tracks layered together. I guess I should have spent a little more time on it, eh? The only real "playing" on it are my guitar parts. I'm pretty happy with the solo I came up with and I'm glad you liked it, too. There are some interlocking rhythm guitar parts that are inaudible but I'm planning on re-recording those anyway. I will probably go back to Debbie in another week or so, redo a few parts and then remix it.
|
Janet
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8094
- Joined: 2010/01/02 19:04:11
- Location: Missouri
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 15:38:50
(permalink)
pssst.....don't delete the midi piano track. It hardly takes up any space. And you can edit it until the last second. If it's still there, that is. :)
|
equality
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 716
- Joined: 2007/01/20 19:55:57
- Location: Sweden
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 15:42:50
(permalink)
Don't bother about the piano quantification. It's a heck of a job. Just severe nit picking from my part and it's probably just audible for home studio nerds, like me. I sit there all time trying to avoid hitting the quantize button in PRV, at least not using 100% but I admit, I use it all the time...
|
notnat
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5236
- Joined: 2007/09/25 22:21:43
- Location: Southeast
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 16:26:16
(permalink)
darylcrowley A gem in the rough. Some great potential here. I little omph on the vocals would be my first change and some great suggestions above. Don't be self-depreciating - it just gets in the way. You have some good strenghts here, just develop them and always think "I kick ass", be humble but confident. You're off to a really good start. Daryl I totally agree with Daryl... Just do it...
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 16:56:09
(permalink)
Janet pssst.....don't delete the midi piano track. It hardly takes up any space. And you can edit it until the last second. If it's still there, that is. :) You are right, of course. The thing is this song was never meant to be a "finished product", so to speak. I used it to try different things and experiment. The fun was in the doing. I'd think nothing of deleting weeks worth of work and starting from scratch because I knew that every time I started over the song would evolve into something new. That's fun for me. I spent a lot of time drawing in the piano part a note at a time until I had enough to copy to other sections, then I'd go through the sections and change things, re-voice chords, transpose sections up or down, etc. I find that kind of thing therapeutic. And at one point the song had almost 100 tracks with a lot of them hidden in the track view, but they would still show up in the console forcing me to scroll around to work on tracks in that view. Even though the console and tracks views are set to stay in sync. That got annoying after awhile so I deleted a lot of tracks I didn't think I'd need again. I didn't worry about it because I knew I could sit down and redo anything I deleted. Somewhere along the line I decided that I would make this version work and now I'm stuck with what I have to work with. But NEXT time I'll not be so quick to delete midi tracks.
|
Janet
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8094
- Joined: 2010/01/02 19:04:11
- Location: Missouri
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/07/16 17:17:35
(permalink)
I understand. :) I guess I'm just the self-appointed 'don't delete midi tracks' police around here. You're not the first one I've said that to. Anyway, if you have that much fun creating it, then think what fun is ahead. :) Carry on! :)
|
elix
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 187
- Joined: 2006/10/17 17:33:29
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/11 22:30:37
(permalink)
Excellent ... sound very professional . ciao elix
ciao elix - - - - - Intel Dp 55 SB, I5 750, 8 gb 1333, RME FF 400, UAD Solo , FaderPort, Yamaha P60, Korg (M1/ 01W/ Wavestation), CME UF7, Yamaha Msp8, Sony SS. Sonar X3 Production ProChannel(full), Universal Audio, Wavelab 6, Z3ta. my Music : https://soundcloud.com/#e2studio
|
Scottytunes
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5695
- Joined: 2009/01/09 23:48:53
- Location: Vermont
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/12 05:50:33
(permalink)
I might be late getting here, but I can't hear anything wrong with this production. I like every aspect of it. I guess it's a matter of taste and I think your production is very tasteful. I wish I could sound even half as good.
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/12 09:47:27
(permalink)
elix, thank you very much. That's very kind of you to say so. Scottytunes, that's very high praise coming from you. I usually feel like throwing my guitar away after listening to your songs. I humbly thank you very much.
post edited by Chappel - 2011/08/28 09:25:06
|
Alegria
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2075
- Joined: 2008/11/07 12:57:49
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/13 14:21:19
(permalink)
|
markno999
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1450
- Joined: 2007/08/27 18:09:30
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/13 14:43:23
(permalink)
Chappel, Lots of potential, good song. I agree the intro sets the listener up for a different type of song but, that makes it interesting. Some really nice ideas throughout. Good work.. Regards
|
Ian Ferrin
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 527
- Joined: 2005/01/28 22:51:42
- Location: Suburbia
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/25 00:09:52
(permalink)
Wow... Huge piece. I really like how you keep hammering home the 'Dancing with Debbie' motif, both the sung and the instrumental versions. When you start off with 30 seconds of that arpegiated synth (which I like), the listener probably expects it to be more integrated into the subsequent stuff. That's my take on the synth. Cool tune. And it sounds good. Peace, Ian
"Everyone is a 'believer' - even if you don't believe, that's a belief" - Me Songs - (at soundclick) Sonar Platinum, Native Instruments Komplete 10u, Korg N1R X2 (for some reason I still love this old synth).
|
thepogue
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2458
- Joined: 2007/11/08 20:34:09
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/25 08:38:44
(permalink)
yea...kinda (at first)had that ELP feel...which is always good to em being a fan....the first thing that jumps out at me is the disparity 'tween the vox and musical reverb. the vox-verb sound small room while the instrumentation sounds large room....that always throws me off because of the disconnect. BTW I love the tune! if you could work on that you'd have a winner in my eyes...love the hook..love the guitar work..and bass runs. Now that I listen a bit more some of the verb on the instrumentation needs work also..@ 4:12 you start that cool guitar work (then doubled) adn as far as space goes all seems well......(love that part) but then round 5:12 the piano comes in (that lil run) and sounsd like its not even in the same space...as if its played in a totally different room....much much dryer sounding...all easy fixes to make this one heck of a tune.. love the whole idea
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Dancing With Debbie - Rough Mix
2011/08/28 09:24:38
(permalink)
Alegria, markno999, I'm glad you liked it. I used to play this song in my last band years ago and it was a pretty straightforward rhythm guitar driven song. Since I've gotten more into software composition/recording thing I have added parts that I thought would enhance the concept of the song. The "dancing" in the song being a metaphor for two people meeting, learning about each other, falling in love, growing old together. Pushing/pulling, yin-yang. The pieces of a jigsaw puzzle falling into place. That sort of thing. And the beginning part represents the initial attraction that evolves into something new. Ian Ferrin, Thanks for your positive comments. I didn't really write this song so much as it was born. I sat down with my acoustic guitar with the intention of writing a song with Debbie in the title. Long story. Anyway, in probably less than 15 minutes I had the song finished. It's a simple song but a deeply personal one. The repeated use of "dancing with Debbie" gives me a mental image not unlike the video of Peter Gabriel and Kate Bush holding each other and swaying to the music in the Don't Give Up video. thepogue, That's just a scratch vocal and I sent it to a reverb bus just so it wouldn't sound so dry while I worked on the song. Hopefully, the finished version will a more cohesive sound to it. There's a LOT of piano stuff I used a volume envelope on so that it comes and goes in the mix. I have so much repetition already I didn't want the keys to add to that. I will take a close look at the piano part you mentioned, and others, when I start working on the song again. The song is far from done and I have many envelopes to tweak before I lay it to rest. I'm glad you like the guitar work. There are a couple of things in that make me cringe when i hear them but I let them slide because I like other things in that part. Some of the guitar parts are doubled with synths, too. After I recorded the guitar part I would come back and transcribe it in the PRV and layer the synths on it. This is most noticeable at 2:50. The guitar part you hear there is 3 layered guitars and 3 different synths. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
|