K705
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86
- Joined: 2007/11/18 02:19:10
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2007/12/17 07:42:20
(permalink)
For me it was more or less a lucky punch to switch to Sonar. I've been looking for a nice set of native FX and tested the Kjaerhus stuff. I recognized that their "Golden Audio Channel" (which was very interesting for me) is included in Sonar (VC 64). God knows why I checked if CW has a crossgrade offer and bingo! - I've been able to buy Sonar for less the price of the "Golden series". I'm usually very Steinberg biased as I used Cubase since the Atari days. But in recent years only Ableton Live made it on my PC because I liked their approach of reduction. In fact I produced more output than ever with this very smart application. However, Live has its weaknesses when it comes to Midi and a "major" sequencer for more complex projects has been on my list for some time now (with low priority though). Well, the rest is known. I tested Sonar intensively and today, just on the last day of the demo period, S7 arrived. I'm happy. :-)
Asus G1S 2x2.2GHz - Zero8 - Receptor pro Komplete - xBase09 - Sherman FB2 - Rode NT1000
|
Healing Spirit
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 15
- Joined: 2007/11/26 03:17:56
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2007/12/17 11:44:53
(permalink)
I recorded 3 cds at a studio, adn the guy used Cubase. When I decided I wanted to do some experimenting (expensive on studio time), I bought Cubase as that was what he had used. I couldn't get on with it. I then read a review of Sonar 7PE in Sound on Sound; the reviewer was really complimentary about it. My local digital sound shop had one copy of the competitive crossgrade left, so I took the risk (risk only as I had not had the time to try out the demo) and bought it. I have to say that Cakewalk's crossgrade offer was very generous of them. My Christmas project is to it down with Garrigus's Sonar 7 Power and explore the software fully, a challenge for me as I usually just dive into software and learn as I go along. The icing on the cake for me is that the software is dongle free, and long may it continue to be. I sometimes have problems finding a free USB port for a dongle ,what with printers, scanners, wireless keyboard controllers etc.
|
garrigus
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8599
- Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
- Location: www.garrigus.com
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2007/12/17 12:08:11
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Healing Spirit My Christmas project is to it down with Garrigus's Sonar 7 Power and explore the software fully, a challenge for me as I usually just dive into software and learn as I go along. Hi Nic, Thanks very much! I hope you enjoy the book... Scott -- Scott R. Garrigus - Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series. Get Sonar 7 Power & Sound Forge 8 Power - Today! Go to: http://www.garrigus.com/ Publisher of DigiFreq - free music technology newsletter. Win a free Absynth 3 or Kontakt 2 DVD Tutorial, go to: http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/ Publisher of NewTechReview - free consumer technology newsletter. Win a free WWF Slam Cam digital camera, go to: http://www.newtechreview.com/newtechreview/
|
MaestroGeek
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 302
- Joined: 2007/12/18 00:24:01
- Location: away from the stinky onion
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2007/12/18 01:41:47
(permalink)
Well, my first experience with MIDI started with a DOS version of Cakewalk that I ran on my 286 laptop computer, not one of these slim & fancy notebook computers but actual laptop computer that weighted good 20lbs as I recall...with monochrome green screen. I remember being absolutely amazed by the computer playing Bach's Invention 13 in Am...the MIDI demo tune 12-Tone System used to ship out with the software...via connected Casio keyboard that I borrowed from a friend. Since then, I've witnessed Cakewalk for Windows, with which I believe I made most music before migrating to the ProAudio series. I used to upgrade with every new release until Steinberg released its Cubase VST.  That's about I started wandering about different DAW softwares bouncing around Cubase VST, Logic Audio, & ProAudio instead of making music. In fact, that's about the time I believe when I last had a chance to do any music making on the computer. Since then, some 10 years have passed without much music but just a whole lot of fussing around equipments & being an absolute specs nerd. Finally, I've figured I should just pick a system that I am most comfortable with and stick with it. After reflecting on the past...from Cakewalk DOS all the way up till I'd lost my mind somewhere in the middle of VST...I'm getting back to what got me started. And this time around, Cakewalk has never looked so good!  It's good to be back.
|
ozaldivar
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2005/11/13 15:13:04
- Location: Honduras
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2007/12/23 10:10:38
(permalink)
Hello. I've being using sonar since cakewalk 6...i won't change for anything it's a great tool.
|
bakatraxx
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11
- Joined: 2008/01/01 13:32:27
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/01 13:56:12
(permalink)
1. What application you switched from and which version of SONAR you switched to. 2. Your specific reasons for switching to SONAR (specific features in SONAR, specific problems with other aps, customer service, etc.) 1. I was using Reason 4 for making HipHop Instrumentals, Mackie Tracktion 2.2 for recording vocals. 2. I wanted to have something that could do it all, making instrumentals and recording vocals. Tracktion can do midi and all that, but I really don't like the implementation. Reason is great for making beats, but you can't record any audio with it. So I sold Reason and started to look for a DAW. Oh boy what a journey. Digging the Internet till 4 in the morning for a few weeks. Watching screenshots. Trying some demos. After like 3 weeks there where only 2 options Left. Cubase 4 and Sonar 7 Producer edition. After hours of comparing the two I finally decided to go with Sonar 7 producer edition. The main reasons where 1. Amazing cool integrated step sequencer 2. Fantastic plug ins and instruments included / Z3TA+ and ! Boost 11 are looking great baby (topping the ones included with Cubase I think) 3. 64bit power 4. Perfect price. 5. Nice and friendly community 6. A company that listens to its customers. 7. I love the mixer. 8. Fantastic Midi editing 9. Probably a lot more then I know Thanks Cakewalk for making the DAW of my dreams!
"Doesn't matter where you come from, it's where you plan to be going that counts!" *Bakatraxx*
|
noteapot
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2008/01/01 15:42:21
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/01 15:53:09
(permalink)
I came from Pro-tool LE primarily because of the Vista/Dual Core support and the fact that protools is a pain to use while travelling because of the hardware interface dongles. Also with the LE version of Pro-Tools you always feel second best for everything. What i like so far is Sonar doesnt crash and it was a straightforward install. Thats said i'm not finding the transition easy or intuitive. Eg would be nice if the mouse controlled zoom like it does in almost every other audio application, the interface is cluttered and the workflow doesnt seem to be straight forward. Fully featured but not intuitive is how i would describe it.
|
rdolmat
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 640
- Joined: 2004/06/02 10:41:11
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/01 18:15:08
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: noteapot I came from Pro-tool LE primarily because of the Vista/Dual Core support and the fact that protools is a pain to use while travelling because of the hardware interface dongles. Also with the LE version of Pro-Tools you always feel second best for everything. What i like so far is Sonar doesnt crash and it was a straightforward install. Thats said i'm not finding the transition easy or intuitive. Eg would be nice if the mouse controlled zoom like it does in almost every other audio application, the interface is cluttered and the workflow doesnt seem to be straight forward. Fully featured but not intuitive is how i would describe it. Keep reading the manual and fooling around with Sonar. It already does all the things you've mentioned.
|
scooter2
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1
- Joined: 2008/01/01 20:24:14
- Location: Queen Charlotte Islands
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/02 22:00:57
(permalink)
Well I've actually been using home studio for quite a long time and I was completly happy with that, until I tried the demo download of Sonar 7. It was expensive for a amateur like myself but I had to have it after that.
|
legobeats
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 123
- Joined: 2007/12/19 01:30:40
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/08 08:36:27
(permalink)
I was using Cubase for a long time, starting with 3.0 (not SX3!). It worked fine for me over all the years, never had any real showstoppers. But after the upgrade from SX1 to SX2 there was that growing feeling of a software getting bigger and bigger but still sounding the same as it was 5 years ago. So I stayed with it, ignored SX3 and never had real interests in Cubase4. I don't need databases to organise my presets or a virtual control room. And SX2 was rock solid over the last years. As I wanted to make a step forward with the sound of my mixes I considered either to buy an UAD card or upgrade my computer and get the Sonar crossgrade. Well, I still think about getting an UAD  but the demo of Sonar 7 convinced me! Nice sounding effects, great virtual channel and that beast called z3ta. It took me only few time to take out my credit card and make the order... After frickeling out some strange problems with my computer everything's fine now and I start to get into Sonar. I still love the workflow of Cubase SX2, but soundwise Sonar is a big step forward. Let's see if I'm clever enough to change my habits and learn how to use all the other benefits of Sonar Oh, and btw: Great forum here! Wolfgang
|
Alaster
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 46
- Joined: 2008/01/10 19:07:10
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/10 19:16:56
(permalink)
1. What application you switched from and which version of SONAR you switched to. I used to use solely Magix Music Maker version 10. I forgot to mention (so I am editing it in) I switched to Sonar 7 Studio Edition, though I'm thinking about upgrading to Producer. 2. Your specific reasons for switching to SONAR (specific features in SONAR, specific problems with other aps, customer service, etc.) Through magix I realized I wanted something more, to actually make and produce professional quality music, and use more synthesizers, plugins, devices, effects, and over-all power and quality than what magix had to offer- because Music Maker is a consumer beginner-level mainly loop-based program. I realized this when I wanted more, and I was able to make sounds in Music Maker (not using pre-made samples) that are rare to come from it. I learned of Sonar and read reviews and such, and determined that it was highly-compatible, completely functional and professional quality, while having an over-all user-friendly interface. So far I'm loving it! (Rapture is an awesome instrument, I wish I had the full version!)
post edited by Alaster - 2008/01/10 19:33:27
|
rlh1007@msn.com
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 79
- Joined: 2007/07/10 00:21:42
- Location: Seattle, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/17 14:20:13
(permalink)
I'm thinking of switching out of Sonar and into Logic 8. Even though I just bought a new PC DAW. If had seen Logic 8 45 days earlier I'd be a Mac owner and Logic 8 user now. I haven't succeeded in ramping all the way up Sonar's learning curve; far from it. I may be an example of someone whose opinion you're not too concerned with; too green. And I believe, as many other posters here do, there certainly are more complex and less well supported products than Sonar. And the Forum community is an asset I'd hate to part with. Logic 8 looks like an equally powerful, but MUCH MORE fun and easier to "drive" application than Sonar. Sonar is fabulously powerful, too, but it's delivered in something more like a box of parts that I need to learn to assemble in order to use it. Thank God for RMX's video on using RMX with Sonar. Using only Sonar documentation, Scott Garrigus' book and the Sonar tutorial videos as aids for setting up the multiple tracks, inputs and outputs for RMX would have taken who knows how long. Same with Kontakt 3. Sonar videos look as though they are meant as sales tools only. They too quickly hit sizzle points to be instructional. Which is OK, but I wish there were more step by step videos/tutorial tools which demonstrate in detail how to use particular features. Take a page out of RMX's marketing book. I attended the Seattle Sonar Roadshow event at Guitar Center a couple months ago and it reminds me of the county fair watching the guys peddle veg-o-matics. Very impressive, very cool, but after you buy and go home to do it yourself, it's "now what did he do"? Maybe if he handed out some tutorial info so we could go home and start doing ourselves what was demonstrated.... Open up Logic 8, load Ultrabeat and see your point of beginning for creating drum parts. Everything is onscreen immediately, dozens/hundreds of drum sets to work with and hundreds of patterns from many genres to load and start making music with INSTANTLY. And I can tweak every drum and setting, too, when I want to. Or start with an empty map, if that's what I want. Now look at Sonar. Box of parts. Look at Garrigus' Sonar 7, page 220 where he starts on drum tracks and drum maps. It's like reading the Internal Revenue Code. It makes the argument for the TV ads between PC and Mac. It almost looks the guys who wrote the ads set this up; nobody could be this stupid, could they? The contrasts can't be more stark! OK, you've got Session Drummer 2, which is OK. And certainly easier than one note at a time PRV programming. And the Pattern Brush Tool? Wow! What a dud. And no way to hear the sound before it goes in. Apple reprogrammed Logic 7, which was clunkier and with a steeper ramp-up than Sonar, into a streamlined, cool, MUCH easier to use program than Sonar. They "Apple-ized" it, dropped the price and created, for this product segment, close to a "Killer App" that is going to sell a lot of Macs. At your expense. I experienced Logic 8 because my brother bought it, after giving up on Home Studio (and maybe a couple of other Cakewalk products) because making music became almost impossible; he was too busy just trying to get the damn thing to work. Paid consultants and all. Finally gave up, bought a Mac, and boy is he happy. But he is not a techie, not "PC", like the guy in the ads, who likes to tinker with all the crap that doesn't work easily; seems to actually enjoy it. I'm a fan of Cakewalk as a company and especially the Forums. Cakewalk supports their products well and listens to its customers. And maybe the PC/Apple mindset difference is one you, as a member of the PC product community, are content with. But if I were a Cakewalk executive, I'd be looking at retaining the under-the-hood horsepower of Sonar but make the product MUCH EASIER to start making music with right out of the box. Make Sonar 8 as significant a step as Logic 8. I'd encourage you to examine Logic 8 and start the time honored method of stealing ideas from the competition. If you do so successfully you'll OWN the PC DAW market.
post edited by rlh1007@msn.com - 2008/01/17 14:38:32
|
rdolmat
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 640
- Joined: 2004/06/02 10:41:11
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/17 14:37:11
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: rlh1007@msn.com I'm thinking of switching out of Sonar and into Logic 8. Even though I just bought a new PC DAW. If had seen Logic 8 45 days earlier I'd be a Mac owner and Logic 8 user now. I haven't succeeded in ramping all the way up Sonar's learning curve; far from it. I may be an example of someone whose opinion you're not too concerned with; too green. And I believe, as many other posters here do, there certainly are more complex and less well supported products than Sonar. And the Forum community is an asset I'd hate to part with. Logic 8 looks like an equally powerful, but MUCH MORE fun and easier to "drive" application than Sonar. Sonar is fabulously powerful, too, but it's delivered in something more like a box of parts that I need to learn to assemble in order to use it. Thank God for RMX's video on using RMX with Sonar. Using only Sonar documentation, Scott Garrigus' book and the Sonar tutorial videos as aids for setting up the multiple tracks, inputs and outputs for RMX would have taken who knows how long. Same with Kontakt 3. Sonar videos look as though they are meant as sales tools only. They too quickly hit sizzle points to be instructional. Which is OK, but I wish there were more step by step videos/tutorial tools which demonstrate in detail how to use particular features. Take a page out of RMX's marketing book. I attended the Seattle Sonar Roadshow event at Guitar Center a couple months ago and it reminds me of the county fair watching the guys peddle veg-o-matics. Very impressive, very cool, but after you buy and go home to do it yourself, it's "now what did he do"? Maybe if he handed out some tutorial info so we could go home and start doing ourselves what was demonstrated.... Open up Logic 8, load Ultrabeat and see your point of beginning for creating drum parts. Everything is onscreen immediately, dozens/hundreds of drum sets to work with and hundreds of patterns from many genres to load and start making music with INSTANTLY. And I can tweak every drum and setting, too, when I want to. Or start with an empty map, if that's what I want. Now look at Sonar. Box of parts. Look at Garrigus' Sonar 7, page 220 where he starts on drum tracks and drum maps. It's like reading the Internal Revenue Code. It makes the argument for the TV ads between PC and Mac. It almost looks the guys who wrote the ads set this up; nobody could be this stupid, could they? The contrasts can't be more stark! OK, you've got Session Drummer 2, which is OK. And certainly easier than one note at a time PRV programming. And the Pattern Brush Tool? Wow! What a dud. And no way to hear the sound before it goes in. Apple reprogrammed Logic 7, which was clunkier and with a steeper ramp-up than Sonar, into a streamlined, cool, MUCH easier to use program than Sonar. They "Apple-ized" it, dropped the price and created, for this product segment, close to a "Killer App" that is going to sell a lot of Macs. At your expense. I experienced Logic 8 because my brother bought it, after giving up on Home Studio (and maybe a couple of other Cakewalk products) because making music became almost impossible; he was too busy just trying to get the damn thing to work. Paid consultants and all. Finally gave up, bought a Mac, and boy is he happy. But he is not a techie, not "PC", like the guy in the ads, who likes to tinker with all the crap that doesn't work easily; seems to actually enjoy it. I'm a fan of Cakewalk as a company and especially the Forums. Cakewalk supports their products well and listens to its customers. And maybe the PC/Apple mindset difference is one you, as a member of the PC product community, are content with. But if I were a Cakewalk executive, I'd be looking at retaining the under-the-hood horsepower of Sonar but make the product MUCH EASIER to start making music with right out of the box. Make Sonar 8 as significant a step as Logic 8. I'd encourage you to examine Logic 8 and start the time honored method of stealing ideas from the competition. If you do so successfully you'll OWN the PC DAW market. Been there...done that...been a Logic user since 2.8 and currently own Logic 8, as well as Sonar 7, Samplitude 9, Cubase SX 1-2-3-4, Pro Fools 7. Nothing beats Sonar....nothing. (except sometimes cubase... due to these reasons here)
|
FirmamentFX
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 250
- Joined: 2007/09/17 20:32:10
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/19 10:21:07
(permalink)
I have *just* switched to Sonar (literally - just reinstalled my system the past couple of days). My previous experience was with Nuendo (from 1.5 up to 3.2). I still have only a very basic grasp of the progam (and one thing I would like to see is a detailed list of how to do things - I like to learn by doing, and doing on music I have made, even as a learning process, not using tutorials with prerecorded material). In brief, my reasons for switching are: - I am reluctant to pay for the Nuendo upgrade, which seems to be offering not very much, and I will be d***ed before I pay MORE for a "music maker's pack" or whatever it is called... - I love the organisation-capabilities of Sonar (I have spent a boring, but satisfying, 4 hours this morning organising my plugins list ;-) Yes I AM OCD... I'm convinced I am! - I don't use the post production capabilities of Nuendo enough to warrant the upgrade, or even sticking with 3.2. What I need to do I can do in Sonar, and the routing capabilities are great (in Nuendo, you can't route to a group that is above - or below, I can't remember which way round it is - that group you want to route from, and there is no way to change the order of groups). - As shallow as it is, I LOVE the user interface. I work about 10 hours a day in my DAW, and need something that I am comfortable with looking at and working with. I am unfortunately a sucker for nice GUI's, and Sonar for me is great. - I love Roland stuff ;-) (just thought I'd throw that in there. Incidentally, when they get round to it, a soft D-50 would be nice... hehe). - Then, finally, there is the intangible "feel" factor of software. Sonar "feels" right for me. The online community is great, I like the feel of the program. It will take a while to learn Sonar I know. I do think the documentation for migrating users could be better, but then that is possibly just me! Anyhow - hello to you all! :-) I'm sure I'll be on here asking many many questions over the next months and years. Cheers, Martin
|
jonfinn
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1
- Joined: 2008/01/18 15:05:04
- Location: Boston, MA
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/19 23:58:32
(permalink)
I'm currently using Sonar 7 and I am thrilled with it! I started using Cakewalk for DOS (midi-only). Sonar is the only program I've seen that gives me a workflow environment that works the way I think. Thanks for all the great work you guys have done over the years!
Thinking too much produces exactly the opposite of the intended outcome.
|
Stevie B
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 299
- Joined: 2007/12/12 21:01:58
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/20 01:49:10
(permalink)
I did make a switch from Roland 1880 to cakewalk. My investment to switch over was a woaping 6,000.00 dollars. Did my home work and looked up every web site for every manufacturer of music software. I always new that Protools was the Industry standard, but things have started to change. Protools way to pricie and cubase way to arogant. You guys at cakewalk are just the thing Ive been looking for you offer the most for the buck and the 64 bit systems the only problem Im having is some of your software progrqams where built on a 32 bit system which gives me some real problems when I go to use Session Drummer 2 or some synth programs. Love Session DRUMMER 2 but it does not act the way it should on a 64 bit system for some reason youall built your Session Drummer 2 program on a 32 bit system and it does not perform as it is suppose to on a Sonar Producer Edition x64 bit system it is missing some real important functions that you all should be really concerned about when it comes to people who arent Drummers and who are on the leading edge of technology. The program gives you the freedom to act like a real drummer with all of the fills and stops and endings that most none drummers need in other words its the real sh--! I need all of its functionalities in the Vista Ultimate 64 bit operating system. If the 64 bit system is the leading edge of technology then be the musicsoftware team that is all of that and all of the past history of later versions. You guys have really impressed me and you all have impressed some really important other companies. Like Roland whiich in my experience is the none rich mans hard disk recording all in one package. They give you the stuff to do all of that is needed to make a great recording except they dont offer the 64 bit systems that you all do. Just work out all of the 64 bit bugs and you will have all of the market share that you ever dreamed of. Most people no and want the leading edge of technology and if you think for just one minute it really is effordable. Ram is the only thing that I can think of that really is not attainable the rest is like a car you just have to do it yourself. Well just so you understand what IM saying is give the best to the best of the best of technology, and all the rest will take care of itsself. Cakewalk can and will be the best out there just remember that volume is way more important than lets say selling ten Porsche cars a year. Love your stuff and youall have great partiners joinig up to be part of it. Just step back and take a look at what youve got and where its all going. In my eyes youve got the best bang for the buck. Just make sure that youve got the bugs worked out before you let marketing do its thing and you will be number one in no time. And let me say you will enjoy every minute of it ,just dont sell it to the chineese. Just so you can be a me person like most of the rich, as long as I got mine who gives a dam about the rest. Wrong , then who will make you who you are but us Americans who have made music what it is. Remember the Beatles Idolized Elvis ! E-mail me at sgbarbee48@yahoo.com From Texas where Stevie Ray Vuaghn is from? thanks GUYS AND GALES GREAT WORK!
|
country
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9
- Joined: 2008/01/27 10:40:41
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/28 12:39:11
(permalink)
Unlike many on this forum, I am a home user, not a professional although years ago I gave lessons on the organ. I now use a Yamaha PSR 3000 to record and burn CDs for friends and family. For the past several years I have used the Sony home studio versions of ACID and Sound Forge, primarily because the full versions were a bit beyond my budget. Also, that was what was available in my area. It was not until after I purchased the PSR 3000 that I became aware of Cakewalk through the Yamaha forum. I was about to switch to Sonar Home Studio XL when Sonar 7 was released. I then switched to Sonar 7 Studio. My reason for making the switch to Sonar 7 are that it offered more features than the studio versions of Sony products and in the Cakewalk online demo videos appeared easier to use. Many of the features in Sonar 7 are available only in the "Pro" versions of Sony products at a higher cost. One thing lacking in Cakewalk products which is included in Sony products is MP3 licensing. I reccomend that this be included in future releases. I have downloaded and installed both the 7.01 and 7.02 patches and am, thus far having no problems. However, I am still becoming acquainted with the software.
|
fooman
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1382
- Joined: 2006/06/26 14:47:44
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/28 15:13:02
(permalink)
Just a comment or two: I was shopping around for a new sequencer after experience issues w/ some hardware that I thought was Sonar's fault. I tried Reaper, cubase for a short demo, and something else that was weak in comparison. I went back to Sonar. Just really easy to get the hang of and learn in detail. Sure, I've been working on Sonar for years, but seeing that I tried other products wanting to get away from Sonar and then just coming back says something. I was actually pissed at Sonar for not playing with my hardware, but I still came back. Alls it took was a reinstall. ;)
|
DuartmaN
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 2008/01/31 08:25:53
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/01/31 08:39:55
(permalink)
Hello from Portugal! i switch from cubase to sonar cause i have many crash's with cubase! I can do everithing and much more in Sonar. I have olnly a basic question? during plaing i cant rewind or forward click on the transport panel?! is this possible? but if i stop plaing i can push the cursor rewind or forward. It´s a basic question but in cubase this possibility for my is very util! SORY MY ENGLISH
|
musicman3527
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/10/18 21:01:31
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/04 12:35:39
(permalink)
i took a chance on sonar when producer edition 3 came out,i was useing the makie d8b in a indie record company in nashville and i had been learning reason in the studio and also had access to guitar studio, i liked guitar studio but knew i had to have somthing faster in the way of quantity and quality, so when 3 pe came out i built it into my home studio where i now am producing with 7 pe and life is wonderful and am looking foward to learning the new upgrades, everytime they come out, i guess u could say ive been very faithful in sonar since 2003,but the quality of cds that i am makeing at down on the farm productions are profoundly astonishing, thanks for being you cakewalk,what a time for composers and producers to have a tool such as sonar producer edition, i guess you could say i wont ever use anything els, im sold http://www.myspace.com/downonthefarmproductions
post edited by musicman3527 - 2008/02/10 10:27:03
|
timfarman
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 169
- Joined: 2003/11/20 17:23:26
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/05 11:23:44
(permalink)
Woe betide me, I bought a Soundblaster Card on recommendation from a friend, back in the days when I knew nothing about Computer Music ! It came with a very cut-down version of Cubase, which didn't work - at all - with the Soundblaster card, because they were each set at different fixed sample rates ! I swapped the Sounblaster for a guitar, bought an Audiophile card (still serves me well)and started looking at different software, getting demos of Magix, Cakewalk etc. The Cakewalk stuff just worked, simple as that! The others had too many problems. I bought an entry level Cakewalk product, I think it was called Plasma. I used this to upgrade to Sonar Studio 3. A few years on I now have Sonar 6 Producer and have ordered Sonar 7 Studio today! The Audio recording works great in Sonar, the plug-ins have got better and better, I'm really happy with the audio side. The MIDI proved harder to learn, when recently trying to get to grips with composing drum parts...frustrating switching between views, zoom levels, and getting the Snap Value set right (the all-important difference between 'Move To' and 'Move By' in the Snap settings, when you're trying to work with MIDI groove clips!) The MIDI improvements and the 'Step-Sequencer' persuaded me to upgrade again..looking forward to getting a visit from the postman. PS Personally, I love the Authorisation process here, hate Dongles (USB never seemed that reliable, my DAW wisely stays away from Internet, and I like to freshly install XP every so often if there's conflicts etc)...the customer support is also excellent in my experience. Hope this continues with the Roland alliance.
|
musicman3527
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2006/10/18 21:01:31
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/10 10:08:20
(permalink)
ive beenwith sonar since 3 pe came out and ive upgraded every time , im at 7 pe now and im still putting out beautiful audio,thanks cakewalk, http://www.myspace.com/downonthefarmproductions
post edited by musicman3527 - 2008/02/10 10:25:51
|
Trojka
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 284
- Joined: 2003/12/19 03:10:34
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/13 17:37:51
(permalink)
I switched because of either the track or plugin limit in HS2005 or 2006 (? not sure). I like big projects I guess. Sonar simply fit my needs better.
|
kingo
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 260
- Joined: 2006/11/15 13:09:55
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/14 01:14:14
(permalink)
Multiple personality disorder! ProTools by day. Sonar by night. Either I'm more talented at night, or Sonar sounds better than ProTools. Must be the drugs :) Eddie
|
studiofreak
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 357
- Joined: 2003/12/26 15:07:42
- Location: New Jersey
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/14 10:42:49
(permalink)
Over the years, I primarily used PTLE in my home studio. Picked up Sonar 1 through a crossgrade offer but was so comfortable with PT, I continued to do most of my work on that platform. Recently, I upgraded to Sonar 6 because of the features that were added, i.e. audio snap, etc.. More importantly, I was not happy with the limitations of PTLE. The differences and added features were noticibly better with S6. About that same time, I signed on for a major project that was being recorded in several locations and ultimately would be finalized and mixed in PT. For consistency and at the request of the folks involved, I reluctantly upgraded my ptle rig so that we could pass the project drive back and forth and it would not require and additional exporting and importing of files, etc. Got through the project, but regreted spending the money on a digi LE product. This month, I upgraded to Sonar 7 and there will be no looking back. The quality of the sound IS superior to PTLE. Whether it's the 64 bit mixing engine or the architecture of the program itself, Sonar sounds better. My mixes sound tighter and have much more clarity on things like reverb tails. After working again in PTLE, I found a lot of things frustrating. One of the major considerations for me to permanently stay with Sonar is the automatic plugin delay compensation. This is a nightmare in PTLE as you're always nudging tracks and adding additional delay compensation plugins for UAD. Also, the limted # of tracks and limited # of inserts on each track in PTLE is ridiculous. I don't need 50 plugins on each channel, but if you automatically lose one insert for delay comp and then another for some eq tweaking, you're left with only a few inserts and I find that's limiting espcially on vocal tracks where I might insert an eq, comp, de-esser and maybe a tape sim. The ability to import and export omf files in Sonar is a great feature that is standard. With PTLE, I need to spend another $500-$1200 just to get that functionality. To me, this is a huge ripoff. Same goes for the track limitations. Sonar has none (other than what your system can handle). PTLE has 32 voices (only 16 stereo tracks) and for me to go to 48 'tracks', I need to spend another $500. For me, it was a no-brainer to stay with Sonar. The sound is better, it's stable and If I'm going to spend another $1700 for basic functionality on PTLE that I already have with Sonar, I'd much rather spend that $1700 on a nice mic or pre-amp or converters and make music that sounds that much better. -rich PS: the only thing I will truly miss are the McDSP plugins. Any chance y'all can convince them to port their products to VST?
post edited by studiofreak - 2008/02/14 10:46:57
|
JoseC.
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 471
- Joined: 2003/11/10 14:46:11
- Location: León, Spain
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/15 13:29:30
(permalink)
I started on the late 80's with a Fostex X-26 4 track, to which I eventually added a little Yamaha QY-10 sequencer, recording instrumental tracks with my guitar and a Casio phase distortion synth. Later on I bought my first computer, a Compaq Presario 486 at 66MHz, running Windows 3.11. I bought a copy of Passport Trax, and I was fine for some years more. Music is a hobby, and I was not spending that much time on it then. Then on 1999 my house got broken into, and all my things got stolen, guitars, amp, pedals, both computers (I had a laptop, but the old 486 was still on duty running Passport trax), synth...and all my CD collection. Disaster. So I fought the insurance company, and not that I won (you never do), but I did not lose, either, so I was able to look at buying shiny new things. Technology had leapt forward, and everybody here said "Cubase!". Well, Cubase looked good, featurewise, but I was working as ERP software consultant then, and I had come not to trust companies that seem more interested in establishing "industry standards" instead of keeping their installed base happy. I did some research and found that Cakewalk was closer to Microsoft, that the company seemed conservative and solid in its pace, and last but not least, my usual music shop had a discounted copy of Pro Audio 9! I bought it, then I got Pro Suite, then Sonar 1XL, Sonar2XL... all bought online because shops around here do have Cubase/Logic in stock, but Cakewalk upgrades? Nah...then the Edirol agreement shut the online shop for us, and I skipped Sonar 3...by Sonar 4 I decided that it was enough and fought with Roland Iberia for my right to buy the Sonar 4 Producer upgrade (no kidding, really, emails spanned three continents...), in the end I got a Sonar 4 Studio upgrade, and was told to be happy with it because that was everything I was going to get  Anyway, things got fixed shortly after, online shop was open again, and Roland Iberia went on with their hardware business and I went back to the online shop for Sonar 5 PE, and Sonar 6PE one year after...until now. I use to upgrade come May, when the days are longer, and the final bug fixes have bloomed...so Sonar 7PE is nearer...
|
cryptexmarble
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 289
- Joined: 2008/01/30 15:05:37
- Location: Zürich , Confoederatio Helvetica
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/17 13:21:23
(permalink)
 I switched from Cubase 4 Studio to Sonar 7 Producer. And after 5 weeks of working with Sonar , i realy like it alot! Midi editing is very fast done. The included plugins are awesome. I used Steinberg for 6 years . But there are some things which slow me down a bit . For example, i have not found out , how i can bounce softwaresynths , without recording a huge track which starts at the first beat and ends at almost the end of the project. I select a specific region in the trackwindow ,and then like in Cubase i would like to bounce JUST for example 8 bars (beats) of that softsynth track to another track. But when i select a region and solo the track which plays my softsynth,and then try to use the bounce to tracks function, then sonar tells me that i have no audio in this region selected?????( When i bounce AUDIO tracks ,this problem isnt a matter.Then Sonar generates just a small track which matches the selection i have made.) I dont get it. And when i have made NO selection then sonar would bounce it , BUT it bounces the whole lenght of the project ,which generates a very big file , in which i can only use this small 8 beats region. Sorry but this issue realy makes me a bit a hard time ,because i have to bounce softsynths very very often. PLease help me on this one because i have to work on my music every day .I produce FullonTrance music.    Thanks alot for Your Awesome Product!! Sonar 7 SOUNDS much better to me then Cubase 4 ---- I listen on Dynaudio BM5As hooked to a SPL Volume 2 ,which gets the Signal from a RME ADI 2 converter. Thanks!
|
Mike Kohlgraf
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 344
- Joined: 2008/02/18 15:08:10
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/18 16:24:07
(permalink)
Ex Cubase user here as well... Fairly new to Sonar. Switched from Cubase to Sonar 6 Producer and, naturally, had to upgrade when v7 came out. I've mainly been recording and mixing audio tracks, so I have yet a whole bunch of things to learn. No worries, I'll try and keep the dumb questions to a minimum. Mike
|
soundchaser59
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 558
- Joined: 2008/02/18 21:02:52
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/18 22:07:07
(permalink)
Hi! My name is Soundchaser, and I'm a soundaholic. (everyone together): "Hi Soundchaser!" I have been using Mackie Tracktion (v.2 and v.3) for about 9 months. I was using an Atari 1040STE with Hybrid Arts SMPTE Track Platinum for my sequencer from about 1988 to 2006. I also had a Tascam 2488 hard disk recorder. The Hybrid Arts would slave to any multi track recorder using midi or smpte. The Atari died, and I was tired of spending $300 bucks a pop to keep it running. The Hybrid Arts program was absolutely rock freakin solid, it never wavered once, not for one second. Best sequencer the world ever saw, but it was so old it did not handle audio, only midi. So I figured that was the time to abandon Atari and switch to a PC-based sequencer. I was looking only for a machine that would sequence midi and simultaneously could control the transport of the 2488 by using MMC. Tracktion was the only one I found that did that flawlessly and did it for less than $200 bucks. At first glance, Tracktion did everything that "those other $500 dollar sequencers" were doing, at least everything that I thought I would ever want to do. It worked flawlessly at first, recording and mixing simple audio, 5 or 6 tracks at a time, maybe a couple of midi tracks, and some built in plugs for reverb. It also controlled the 2488 transport without a hitch. It worked so well that I thought this was the perfect excuse to get rid of the Tascam 2488. It had several issues of its own that I was not looking forward to dealing with, and it was proprietary hardware, never a good thing imo. So I sold the 2488, I dove head first into Tracktion. As I acquired more plugs and started wondering what could possibly be the limits of this computer-based music engineering marvel, I decided to build a better computer. Hence the Core 2 Duo machine I run now. I had XP Pro for free from academic alliance, but I now have XP 64 bit on the way to my house. I started to buy third party plugs like Groove Agent, which I love as my drummer, and like Ozone, Sonic Maximizer, Sonik Synth, Pianoteq, and maybe a few others I cant think of right now. Tracktion worked great until I made a mistake with Groove Agent, which I documented. (I changed the Groove Agent drum kit while the Tracktion transport was running.....instant death and hard reset, Tracktion has not handled GA correctly since that moment) That's when the buzzing thing started, but it didn't stop me from working. Then this complete lockout issue happened Tuesday night and now I'm dead in the water. Best I can do right now is grab the raw wav files and save them for import later into another host. I dropped my suspicions about Groove Agent after I realized that I can not even start a new project and save work. I cant even save one midi track or one second of audio in a brand new project. It wont even save a plugin added to a track. It gives me a Save button, but when I reopen the project there is nothing there, nothing gets saved. Existing projects lock up as soon as they open. Tracktion is just completely incapacitated at this point. I can open the program, and start a new project, but that's it. Cant save anything new and cant open anything previously saved without locking up. All of my forum buddies are recommending Sonar 7 Producer. So here I am. S7 Producer is on its way to my house, and I will be installing it in XP Pro 64 bit. If I can load my existing material into Sonar, and use my existing plugs, all on XP 64, then I will be extremely happy a month or so from now!! SC
|
mombasa
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1
- Joined: 2008/02/21 15:50:03
- Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.
2008/02/21 16:00:35
(permalink)
Hello, this is my first post. I´m really glad to be here and must admit - u at cakewalk did some really fine piece of software ! I used cubase se 3 before and never will again. somebody forgot to get cubase from the 80s to nowadays. its so uneasy to use. so i had a look around but no sequencer other then sonar offered what i was looking for. and : the really fair crossupgrade price finally made me buy it ( Sonar 7 Producer Edition for 279 € ). thanks again for that useful software that doesnt kill my creativity like cubase did. midi, fx, audio, session drummer - everything is so easy to understand and to use. hope to have u develop sonar on a constant base and would therefore be a faithful customer for years :D
|