Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story.

Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 11 of 16
Author
rob_lee
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 62
  • Joined: 2008/11/17 15:42:51
  • Location: North East - UK
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/17 15:56:03 (permalink)
Yeah i just switched from Cubase today after years and ordered Sonar 8 Producer today....be here in the morning so can't wait to install..
Rob Lee
cryptexmarble
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 289
  • Joined: 2008/01/30 15:05:37
  • Location: Zürich , Confoederatio Helvetica
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/17 23:18:08 (permalink)
I just dare people to turn on that 64Bit engine AND let the audio also render in 64Bit .
At the end just bounce the whole Mix with 64 Bit so that you have a 64 Bit wav Mix -THEN
compare-----its a dream!!!!!! American Technology.

I had some discusions about the 64 Bit master Mix --- when you compare a 64 Bit bounce to something else you will hear a nice improvement while the 64 Bit master plays --- but when working and turning the 64 Bit feature on and off , no diffeerence in Audio quality can yet be heard ---- THE MIX IS THE WHOLE MAGIC PEOPLE OF SOUND!!!!!
But its a nice moment every time when i enter my friends Logic equiped studio , and then be able to realy feel the great sound advantages of Sonar over Logic- Before i thought mixes that sound as good as Sonars , are only possible with very expensive outboard hardware --thanks God i was wrong. The fact of the highest possible soundquality in a DAW has enlightened my ears completely - It is such a Joy to listen to Sounds and Music created with Sonar, thanks a lot for that!


Sonar 8 Producer , Vista Ultimate , SPL Volume 2 , Dynaudio BM 5A, Roland JP 8000, Motu Ultralite, Dell Inspiron, Edirol Pcr m1

www.myspace.com/cryptexmarble
Upright
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Joined: 2005/12/01 16:14:56
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/21 01:43:46 (permalink)
I used Reaper for about 8 months. Reaper was my first real experience with a DAW. While using Reaper I found that my CPU just wasn't up to speed so I set out to build a PC that would handle recording. After building my PC a friend suggested that I give Sonar a try and the rest is history.....I am now using Sonar 8 PE and at this point I don't think I'll ever use a different DAW,......Sonar rocks!!

Windows 7 64-bit, i7 2.93 GHz, EP45-DS3R Mother Board 2GB ram, 2 sata 500GB drives, M-Audio ProFire 610, Sonar 8PE, Alpha Track, Mpc 2500


Bless the Lord!!
Upright
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Joined: 2005/12/01 16:14:56
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/21 01:45:24 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: BTU

Howdy,

I didn't switch. I just bought Sonar straight off the shelf.

Not knowing anything, I was trying to buy Pro Tools. But the salesman at Pro Tools was so haughty that I bought Sonar instead.

BTU



LOL,...awesome!! The cool thing about Sonar is you can use any soundcard or interface you want.

Windows 7 64-bit, i7 2.93 GHz, EP45-DS3R Mother Board 2GB ram, 2 sata 500GB drives, M-Audio ProFire 610, Sonar 8PE, Alpha Track, Mpc 2500


Bless the Lord!!
robapol
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 17
  • Joined: 2004/10/11 12:17:46
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/22 03:30:18 (permalink)
I went away from Sonar earlier this year and tried Cubase, but apart from Cubase's arrangement facility I don't think its in the same league, especially if you are starting out or on a budget. As an example I just wrote and recorded a short midi strings quartet using Sonar 7 and the tools and plugins that came with Sonar 7 and nothing more. To me it sounds so real, even though I'm a noob at this. (Can be heard here Short Quartet)

With Cubase I can't even get close to the above. To do so would involve spending another £400 plus just to get the right sound. I can't believe that off the shelf, with nothing else other than a computer, one can generate such sounds.

I've done with my flirting, I'm staying with Sonar

RobP
Upright
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 434
  • Joined: 2005/12/01 16:14:56
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/11/22 09:53:44 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: robapol

I went away from Sonar earlier this year and tried Cubase, but apart from Cubase's arrangement facility I don't think its in the same league, especially if you are starting out or on a budget. As an example I just wrote and recorded a short midi strings quartet using Sonar 7 and the tools and plugins that came with Sonar 7 and nothing more. To me it sounds so real, even though I'm a noob at this. (Can be heard here Short Quartet)

With Cubase I can't even get close to the above. To do so would involve spending another £400 plus just to get the right sound. I can't believe that off the shelf, with nothing else other than a computer, one can generate such sounds.

I've done with my flirting, I'm staying with Sonar

RobP




Yeah,.....sounds like real instruments to me!!

Windows 7 64-bit, i7 2.93 GHz, EP45-DS3R Mother Board 2GB ram, 2 sata 500GB drives, M-Audio ProFire 610, Sonar 8PE, Alpha Track, Mpc 2500


Bless the Lord!!
jjdubs
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 66
  • Joined: 2004/01/17 19:40:14
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/12/05 08:14:55 (permalink)
I started out many years ago with Magix. I then bought Voyetra's Record Producer. Soon after that I purchased Cakewalk Music Creator. I upgraded that a few times before getting Home Studio 6, then 6XL. A couple of months ago I upgraded to 7XL. I wasn't too crazy about the interface but I was willing to adapt. Then Cakewalk offered the Sonar 8 Studio upgrade for $39 so I bit and that's where I am now.

I am a multimedia journalist for a newspaper/website in northwest Indiana, not a musician, but I've always liked music and synthesizers and this is a way to fulfill a fantasy. And I have applied some of my musical "talent" to a few of my multimedia projects. At work I use a MacBook Pro so I use Logic Express 8 on that.

John
bluescat
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 29
  • Joined: 2003/11/11 22:51:00
  • Location: France (living in Bangkok, Thailand)
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2008/12/27 23:51:25 (permalink)
Oops! Please read Snar 7.0 not 6.0....imy previous post. Sorry.
Druid
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7
  • Joined: 2009/01/06 15:06:01
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/01/06 15:15:43 (permalink)
I first tried out a version of "Cakewalk" many years ago, before the name was changed to "Sonar". However, I switched to Sonar from Logic. I had been using Logic for a few years in my Windows Based recording studio and was fairly happy with it. However, when emagic got bought out by Apple and discontinued their Windows product, I had to make a tough decision. Either convert the studio to Mac, or convert my DAW from Logic to something else. I priced a bunch of Macs, while I downloaded and tried a bunch of software demos and read about the other Windows based DAWs.

In the end, after the evaluation I went with Sonar. I found it to be not only better then the competition, but much better then Logic.

So I've been happy with Sonar Producer edition for a number of years, and as far as I can tell the competition can't touch them.
Mike Fisher
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1374
  • Joined: 2003/11/05 16:49:04
  • Location: Indianapolis, IN
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/01/06 15:44:08 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: bluescat
Oops!


Just FYI...I see people write follow up / correction posts. You can 'edit' your post(s) if you happen to write incorrect information or want to change anything else you've written.
fireonline
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14
  • Joined: 2005/02/24 07:22:44
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/01/18 13:19:06 (permalink)
I've been using Sonar since it was Sonar 0.0 and I've even used just Cakewalk (before Sonar was invented), its my 9th year with this product and I love, I know what it like and what it dont like, yes there are bugs but I know how to work around it. I've tried almost all the other DAWs but I stuck with Sonar. I'm a television / radio producer, audio engineer for over 18 years, I looked at Sonar develop and now I can used Sonar 8 with very little or no extra external plugins. Kepp up the good work Cakewalk.
shidan
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12
  • Joined: 2009/01/20 10:10:51
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/01/20 17:24:17 (permalink)
Hi! Been using an older version of Sonar for a few years, popped on here a few times but not got involved! Sonar's latest DAWs' are excellent and have come on a long way! Look forword to upgrading sometime to the latest and probably the best around Today! regards....Chi
DJSur
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 326
  • Joined: 2008/10/19 15:09:04
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/01/24 14:45:05 (permalink)
I switched to Sonor from Logic. I'm a PC user and we all know Logic doesn't run on Vista unless it's in a VPC with XP.

Learning a new format took a bit of time, but it was a blessing.

Colsong
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9
  • Joined: 2009/02/05 17:02:47
  • Location: Dublin, Ireland
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/05 17:25:21 (permalink)
Hey there,

Ive been using an iMac and mbox for quite some time now. Just got sick of numerous crashes, and being unable to upgrade my hardware. So I built myself a PC, got a bargain on a Firepod and purchased Sonar 8. It was mainly through word of mouth I heard Cakewalk was the mutts nuts, so you must be doing something right.
vadym33
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 17
  • Joined: 2009/02/05 11:31:58
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/06 00:06:50 (permalink)
i used sonar for 1 year..and its actually my first recording program i ever used. What can isay? its great to me! i just would love to see more midi plu ins! i use a lot of them! Sonar is one of the best!
zontox
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11
  • Joined: 2009/01/02 00:34:23
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/11 18:27:42 (permalink)
I had spent a lot of time experimenting with the Magix music products in the past, they were quite limited in terms of features, I also made music in Fruity Loops and FLSTUDIO. I then switched to Samplitude, after recently switching to Sonar I can say for the first time I'm actually really happy with a music product. It does absolutely everything I need and more, no holes left to fill for me. It has made me excited about making music and has taken away the frustration of having to switch between different programs due to one or the other not having the features I need.
post edited by zontox - 2009/02/11 18:33:10
ewtwolf
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 42
  • Joined: 2008/01/14 14:41:16
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/13 18:43:44 (permalink)
I started out with Cakewalk Professional...I still have my single 3.5" floppy disk for which I paid $500 ... I later grew with Cakewalk into the Pro Audio line but eventually switched to Cubase SX and had a good run with that program...I do like the UI for Cubase quite a bit.

As I have grown with computer recording and sequencing I switched from hardware synths to virtual instruments so I have been on the holy grail quest of finding the most bang for my buck in terms of processing power. I fell into the Apple marketing hype and thought paying the big bucks for a top of the line apple computer and getting Logic would give me the power I needed -- boy was I mistaken. I purchased a Mac Pro 8 Core intel system amost 2 years ago and started with Logic 7. I absolutely hated Logic. I don't even know where to begin with it's limitations...but the "environment" comes to mind, as with strange workflows that were hard to adapt after spending so much time with other sequencers. I sold Logic 7 and tried Digital Performer...ugh, it has some cool features but some really backwards ways of doing things...until recently it had no rt. mouse button support and it doesn't use midi regions for editing. Wierd. I tried Cubase 4 on the mac but there were so many performance issues I ended up selling it. Then Logic Studio came out...wow, this looked promising. A revamped UI, better workflows...wrong. Again, after spending $150 in tutorial videos I still find it clunky to work with. I hate the strict design. I can't move my transport without throwing away the whole purpose of the new UI. I always have to start a project by being forced to create a track first. Sure I know I will need a track, but let me start with a blank slate -- Don't impose a workflow on me. I hate that none of the track level meters mean anything and that the channel strp doesn't update correctly.

I know I am in the minority here, but I just think Logic is not very good -- Way over hyped. In particular, I am always struggling with CPU spikes with very minimal projects. I am running an 8 core system wth 6 gigs right? Shouldn't this be running like melted butter?

So, fastforward to the present...I needed to install Vista 64 on my mac through bootcamp so I can run Maya 2009 64 bit and Photoshop 64 bit. I then decided to give Sonar 8 demo a try...holy shiat...it works! I know I have been reading about user problems with Sonar, but I am telling you this version works great on my Vista Mac. For example, I can run tons of VI's...including Omnisphere and Kontakt, and it works, with no CPU spikes and hardly any cpu drain. Granted with Omnisphere, switching things has a little lag as it loads in and out of memory, but it never crashes, and I can load about 8 instances with 4-5 part multis without a hitch and barely tax my system. On the Mac/Logic side this was impossible. I would always get CPU overload messages. Even Sonar's UI has grown on me -- I love the customization options. I love proper track folders vs Logics embedded folders. I love the track manager, snap tools...etc. Honestly, I think Sonar's UI is oneof it's greatest strengths. No candy coated garbage. It just works and works well. I'm sure I will hit limitations as I delve deeper, but nothing I don't feel I can't tackle. Hell, even being able to load an bitmap image on the background is killer. AND, since Spectrasonics is releasing everything in 64 bit as with NI eventually, my performance is only going to increase, plus with Cakewalk releasing 8.03 soon...everything is looking up. I think that what sells me the most on Sonar is the development. I love coming to this forum and reading fairly up to date announcements of where Sonar is going. Consistent history of updates and new versions. Try that with Apple. Their software developement is so sparce.

So yes, I am wierd, I barely load up OSX anymore -- it is a cool OS, don't get me wrong, but it suffers from the boutique syndrome where major development for cross platform apps and plugins goes to windows setups first, then ported to Mac...so you never get the full power unless it is directly written for OSX. No Maya 64 bit on OSX right now for example :( Vista honesly is perfectly stable on my Mac system. I feel confident in Cakewalk since this is their 3 rd generation of running in a 64 bit environment. All the other sequencers slowly trickling to 64 bit are bound to those initial growing pains. Sonar has matured so well in this regard.

After spending time with the demo I decided to place my order for Sonar 8...looking forward to making some music, thanks for a great product!
post edited by ewtwolf - 2009/02/13 19:02:01

Sonar 8.02 - Mac Pro Intel 8 Core - 6 GB ram - Vista 64 Ultimate Bootcamp - Four 500 GB 3.0 SATA Drives - Presnus Firebox - M-Audio Keystation 88es - Kore - Komplete 5 - Omnisphere - EWQLSO Play - Symphobia - SD2 - M-Audio Tampa/Sputnik
JOE BOND
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2009/02/13 22:22:31
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/13 22:40:45 (permalink)
I JUST GOT A NEW PC WITH WINDOWS VISTA 64 SO I HAD TO GIVE UP MY PRO TOOLS LE. SO FAR I JUST GOT THE 30DAY DEMO, BUT I HAVENT GOT EVERY THING RUNNING YET. I CANT USE REWIRE FOR REASON 4 OR BATTERY 3. IF I CAN GET THAT GOING I MIGHT STICK WITH IT AND BUY THE REAL DEAL

I-DONT-PLAY
sscannon
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 497
  • Joined: 2006/11/05 00:16:58
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/19 20:40:49 (permalink)
I got into Sonar at version 5, after ditching Cakewalk Pro Audio 9 for PTLE years ago. Now I have set up a sweet Sonar-based system here. Thanks to companies like Cakewalk for making such fantasic software products. Check out the pics:
www.myspace.com/redroomstudiosrocks

Check your mix in mono.
www.redroomaudio.com
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4105
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
  • Location: Keystone Colorado
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/19 20:50:59 (permalink)
I was using an adat and a Soundcraft LX7 board.

I was so enthralled with mixing in the box with Sonar that I sold my LX7 thinking it was soon obsolete.

Woops!



Raymeous
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 25
  • Joined: 2009/02/17 07:47:44
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/20 03:30:01 (permalink)
OK another new DAW guy here.

I recently purchased both Pro Tools LE and Sonar 7 PE. It's a long story. Unfortunately I have not been able to get started on my studio due to my jobs habit of moving me around alot. I liked the idea of Pro Tools as they have a VERY good marketing team, it is about as close to an industry standard as you can get, and knowing that the big guys like George Lucas and Peter Jackson use it to make blockbuster movies made it very attractive. However since I was not able to set up either PTLE or S7PE I have spent my time reading the user guides and anything else I can find on both and have determined that Sonar is more of what I need. My interpretation of the info makes me feel that Sonar will be better at MIDI implementation than Pro Tools and since I'm usually on my own MIDI sequencing will be a huge part of how I operate. Besides being a prog rock and metal fan, I am also a huge film score guy and since I can't afford to have a full orchestra and choir hang out in my living room while I write I'm going to need the MIDI capabilites for softsynths. I know PTLE has MIDI stuff but my gut reaction is that Sonar will be better at it. Also finding that Roland and Cakewalk have teamed up is a good selling feature to me since I've been using Roland gear since the JV-80 came out. Any way I hope that Sonar will help me finally get a CD or three finished. Thanks for listening.
Peter J
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 424
  • Joined: 2003/12/19 20:40:35
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/02/27 22:58:07 (permalink)
Heya Forum!

Switch? Oh yeah. I switched from Cakewalk Pro Studio 9 to SONAR 1 and never looked back. I have every version through 6 inclusive. I missed 7 but still plan to get 8. SONAR rox!

-Phoen1x
 
the artist formerly known as Peter J
 
new music soon from Tightrope Fortune!
 
The *brand new* Phoen1xDAW:
Core i5 3.3 GHz on Asus P8B75-M
32 GB Mushkin Blackline RAM
(2) Seagate 1 TB HD's
1 GB nVidia Vid
Win 7 Pro SP1
SONAR X3!
 
My DAW is not cutting edge. It is middle-of-the-blade super bang for the buck! The BAM is in the RAM. ;-|
 
k4ro
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 25
  • Joined: 2006/08/29 11:47:22
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/03 00:55:28 (permalink)
Here is my recording gear time line. I had more failures than successes, but it was interesting to look back over the path.

1985 - Tascam 234 4 track. The system worked well. Especially after adding a small outboard mixer. No MIDI capability.

1991 - Roland GR-1 and Cakewalk MIDI SW. MIDIAtor MPU401 MIDI interface. Primitive Windows stuff. I didn't like the MIDI sounds. Gave up on computer recording, and stayed with the Tascam tape machine for a few more years.

1998 - Roland VS 1680. It worked, but I hated the user interface. The sound quality was not great. The VS internal mic pre's were sub par, among other things. Windows still did not seem ready for prime time host-based recording. The Mac / Pro Tools path was well beyond my budget.

2000 - Tried Cakewalk PA9. The on board laptop sound card (ESS Maestro) never worked properly. Back to the VS-1680.

2001 - Tried Sonar 1.0 with an EGO-SYS WaMi Box sound card PCMCIA interface on laptop. Driver issues with EGO-SYS were never fully resolved.

2004 - Sonar 3.1SE. Home-built Intel motherboard P4 desktop computer and Delta 1010 interface. My first host-based system that actually WORKED. Still had some glitch issues, but I was actually doing most of my work in 2-track with Wavelab during this time period.

2009 - Jumped five versions to Sonar 8.3 SE. Upgraded last week, thanks to Cakewalk's welcome and affordable upgrade policy. 8.3 SE seems to be running fine on my 5 year-old P4 2.8GHz system w/ 2GB RAM and the Delta 1010 in tests performed so far. The program feels much more responsive as well. I love the look and feel of Sonar 8.3 (MUCH improved over 3.1)

I've stayed with the Studio Editions because the majority of my work is recording acoustic instruments. I do use MIDI tracks for click and melody guide tracks, and for importing Sibelius scores to make practice loops. I just don't need all of the extras offered in the Producer Edition. I've ordered Scott's book this time, in hopes of getting a better handle on some of the possibilities (which I am sure I am missing.) I am most excited about the arrival of the Tranzport to free me from the desktop. If it works as well as the demos I've seen, it could change my recording life.

The user community is a huge plus with Cakewalk. Thanks for being here!
Hubie J
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 43
  • Joined: 2008/12/19 08:36:16
  • Location: Gloucestershire, UK
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/10 11:25:39 (permalink)
Hiya
I am a keyboard player and wanted a music program to edit all my midi files to use with my Yamaha keyboards.

I started out with Mackie Tracktion v1 and liked it as audio was quick and easy but Midi wasn’t so good, so some months latter I switched to Cubase SE. After a few years I upgraded to Cubase Studio 4 (bad move), I just got so upset with Cubase and that dongle thing.

Then I purchased a Edirol M-16DX mixer with an USB interface that I can use as a analogue mixer when gigging with my keyboard and also use as a sound card with a midi interface when plug into the computer, anyway Edirol mixer included CAKEWALK SONAR LE so I gave it a try and then realising you can do so much more and also add Lyrics into my midi files, Well SONAR is great and I have a lot of learning to do but I feel SONAR far is better and more compressive than Cubase.

I finally decided that I had to upgrade, SONAR 8 PRODUCER EDITION was a prudent move for the added midi and audio features and 30 plus plugings included, so I phoned them at Cakewalk and explained my situation and they did a realy good price for me with free postage.

I have had SONAR 8 PRODUCER EDITION now for 2 months and just cant beleive how comprehensive it is, I have change the colours, removed most of this buttons as I like working from the menu and short cut keys (Keyboard bindings) have also bought the SONAR 8 POWER BOOK to help me along, If I get stuck there are some great tutorial video and forums on line, It is realy great to work with.

All the Best, Take care, Hubie-J

Home Built i7-780, 8Gb Ram, 500Gb 7200rpm HD for Windows 7 Pro x64bit,
500Gb 7200rpm HD for Music, Cakewalk Sonar X1 Expanded x64bit
Cakewalk V-Studio 100 control surface
Novation X-Station Midi Control Keyboard Synth
ronniebee
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 632
  • Joined: 2004/07/27 00:12:13
  • Location: Douglasville, Georgia
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/12 02:09:28 (permalink)
Hi I'm Ronnie Bee
Owner of Ronnie Bee's GigaByte Band, and Enchanting Moments Studio, (Home Movies).

The main reason I went to Sonar 8 Studio Edition from SHS-XL is I purchased a 64 Bit PC, and am running Vista Ultimate 64. Also. I recently bought a ASUS Xonar-D2X PCI-Express DTS, (Digital Theater Sound) Optical Sound Card, and a Logitech Z5500 5.1 Surround Sound System. When I found out you were dropping the 64 bit support on the HS-XL side is when I made the final decision to go to Sonar 8.3 Studio.

I sure am glad I did, I have just produced my first test song in DTS Optical Surround Sound, and it sounds Great. The Xonar converts the sound coming from Sonar 8.3 input to DTS 7.1, and you can hear every instrument I put in there, and the voice is so crisp, I love it. The Xonar also came with a PMP Program which will convert my MP3s to Virtual 5.1 or 7.1; and since it has channel volumn normalization it almost mixes the tracks for me.

I will be retiring from my day job April 30, 2009; Plus I have the full version of Dimension-Pro, and all of the other synths that came with Sonar 8; so I hope to have some knock out music up on my sound click soon. I plan to renew my VIP status and produce a few more CDs in Surround Sound before I retire permanently. -

Edit Spelling
post edited by ronniebee - 2009/03/12 07:55:12

Ronnie Bee - X3 Producer, 64b 2.6 Q Core PC, Win7, 8mb. 11TB ATA HD Space, Focusrite Pro40 DTS SurSnd, Voice Prism Plus, Dim-Pro & Rapt 64bit. Yamaha Motif XF. RonnieBee'sGigabyteBand - Enchanting Moments Video Studio
http://www.soundclick.com/pro/?BandID=231503
http://www.cdbaby.com/all/ronniebee
mneme
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5
  • Joined: 2009/03/11 19:53:30
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/12 08:12:07 (permalink)
I've been recording with DAWs since 2004. I use Sonar PE6, Pro Tools and Logic extensively and have some experience with most of the others. With all the DAWs I use coming out with version 8, it's a good time to settle on one. Logic and Pro Tools are entirely different from their previous versions. I want software I use to grow and be developed, not rewritten. I've had customer service experience with both Cakewalk and Pro Tools. Cakewalk responded the next day on each occasion, I'm still waiting to hear from Pro Tools. I belong to Logic Users Group, and know there's a lot of frustration with Apple's customer service. Apple sells computers, I'm not sure their committed to Logic. Sound quality is everything in recording. There is no audible difference in the quality of recordings in any of them. Logic has taken a big step backward (when you take a $1,000 program, add $1000 in programs and Jam packs, then sell it for $500, It makes wonder if their serious about future research and development. Pro Tools is limited in it's track count and third party plug-ins, its starting to get into MIDI but they are way behind that curve. Sonar is mature, stable and has a great mix of instruments and effects. Keep up the good work, I'm committed.
gothic.angel
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 572
  • Joined: 2009/02/27 12:21:53
  • Location: Darkness
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/12 10:10:03 (permalink)
Hi everyone...

I'm involved in Dark Electronic Music...

I Have been using SONAR since "version 4" and, in my experience, It is, by far, the most featured - most stable DAW I've tried (at a quite reasonable price...) ... and I can tell you I tried all DAWs around... (before SONAR, I've used emagic Logic, Cubase SX3, Ableton Live...)

IN FACT, eventually, since "version 5" came out, SONAR has become my real "operative" Sequencer and all Instruments/Plugins supplier... together with "SAMPLITUDE" (other huge DAW/Editor...) for its really advanced "Audio Editor" functions...
I personally find these two together being the most powerful Music Production environment possible on earth...
...simply NO WAY BACK, after you deal with their capabilities/qualities....

To me, SONAR, by ITSELF, gives EVERYTHING needed for creating music... Advanced Sequencer (outstanding MIDI editing features), a deal of Instruments with sounds covering all music genres... great Fx Plugins... SURELY comprehensive - "All-In-One" like no other....

Let me end with a very "personal" consideration... ...I find SONAR even the most "Gothic-Styled" DAW available...
...which makes me really LOVE it more...!!!
post edited by gothic.angel - 2009/04/25 07:38:47

GothicAngeL - EBM - Dark Electronics
______________________________
SONAR Platinum , Rapture Pro
SAMPLITUDE X3 Pro Suite, FL Studio 12, Reason 10

_________________________________________
DELL Dimension E521 - AMD 64X2 - Windows 10 Pro
_________________________________________
Proud "Apple's i-STUFF" Worst Enemy...
ZenOfDeceit
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20
  • Joined: 2008/05/20 01:00:37
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/13 12:15:48 (permalink)
Still Loving It..... Sonar Is The Best!!

System:
Home Built AMD Phenom II X3 700e 
8.00 GB RAM
Win 7 64 Bit 
Sonar 8.5 Producer
  
Interface: 
M-Audio Fast Track Ultra 8R


Addition Software:
NI Komplete 
NI Symphonic Silver Edition
Fl Studio 
G-Sonique Alien303
G-Sonique Renegade


ronniebee
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 632
  • Joined: 2004/07/27 00:12:13
  • Location: Douglasville, Georgia
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/17 10:23:38 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: ronniebee

Hi I'm Ronnie Bee
Owner of Ronnie Bee's GigaByte Band, and Enchanting Moments Studio, (Home Movies).

The main reason I went to Sonar 8 Studio Edition from SHS-XL is I purchased a 64 Bit PC, and am running Vista Ultimate 64. Also. I recently bought a ASUS Xonar-D2X PCI-Express DTS, (Digital Theater Sound) Optical Sound Card, and a Logitech Z5500 5.1 Surround Sound System. When I found out you were dropping the 64 bit support on the HS-XL side is when I made the final decision to go to Sonar 8.3 Studio.

I sure am glad I did, I have just produced my first test song in DTS Optical Surround Sound, and it sounds Great. The Xonar converts the sound coming from Sonar 8.3 input to DTS 7.1, and you can hear every instrument I put in there, and the voice is so crisp, I love it. The Xonar also came with a PMP Program which will convert my MP3s to Virtual 5.1 or 7.1; and since it has channel volumn normalization it almost mixes the tracks for me.

I will be retiring from my day job April 30, 2009; Plus I have the full version of Dimension-Pro, and all of the other synths that came with Sonar 8; so I hope to have some knock out music up on my sound click soon. I plan to renew my VIP status and produce a few more CDs in Surround Sound before I retire permanently. -

Edit Spelling


Update:
I liked the way Sonar 8.3 Studio works with my system so much, I decided to go ahead and upgrade to the PRODUCER EDITION, so I could get all the tools for producing surround sound, and the rest of the instruments that come with PRODUCER. I plan on producing some serious surround sound, and maybe even dubing a few of my Movie tracks.
I'm Trying to talk Cakewalk into Giving me a full production of RAPTURE, since I already bought the full DIM-PRO.

Ronnie Bee - X3 Producer, 64b 2.6 Q Core PC, Win7, 8mb. 11TB ATA HD Space, Focusrite Pro40 DTS SurSnd, Voice Prism Plus, Dim-Pro & Rapt 64bit. Yamaha Motif XF. RonnieBee'sGigabyteBand - Enchanting Moments Video Studio
http://www.soundclick.com/pro/?BandID=231503
http://www.cdbaby.com/all/ronniebee
gtrshop
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 45
  • Joined: 2003/11/14 18:34:42
  • Status: offline
RE: Did you switch to SONAR? Tell us your story. 2009/03/17 12:16:17 (permalink)
As Doc_Drop posted early on, I too switched over from Digital Orch Pro to Cakewalk Pro Audio (8 or 9...) and then of course to Sonar - when it didn't have a version number!

Two reasons I switched.

1/ Tech support at Voyetra couldn't tell me what happened to my work when it D.O.P. crashed while saving it. The entire project was lost. About 6 months later, I was cleaning off my HDD and discovered a hidden file: project.000. This was what D.O.P. did with their projects as a saftey when saving. Tech support couldn't tell me that.

I haven't had to test tech support for Cakewalk, since support is what I do.

2/ Even though the interface in D.O.P indicated more than one "port"... referring to individual sound cards, D.O.P. could not see more than one sound card at a time. I surmised that I needed something more robust.

I have been a Cakewalk product user since then.

Steve
Huntsville, Ontario.
Page: << < ..1112131415.. > >> Showing page 11 of 16
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1