Mic pre-amp technique?

Author
NoKey
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 974
  • Joined: 10/28/2008
  • Status: offline
April 14, 10 10:20 PM (permalink)

Mic pre-amp technique?

Hi dear forum people,

I'd appreciate guidelines on the following.

1. A typical mic external preamp has Input-Gain control, and Output-volume control. Both reflect as a single input for Sonar recording purpose.

2. So, how do you adjust the end product? Which is best, to gain recording level by cranking the Input, or by cranking the output of the preamp? Factors of interst would be clarity, distortion, noise, and so forth.

3. Also, we then have the software card/interface mixer control... Are there guidelines on where to best make the adjustments?

Thanks for any replies.
#1

24 Replies Related Threads

    ShadDOH
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1027
    • Joined: 12/31/2009
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 14, 10 10:45 PM (permalink)
    It depends... I have two mic pre's The Avalon came with a really nice manual that gives some good recommendations regarding what you're recording? For example, for vox, I think you usually want a cleaner sound going in? So there are compressor settings, and EQ settings that are recommended, that's what I go with.

    For me, it's typically the Neuman U87AI in to the Avalon 737-VT, in to the Fireface 800. And once the track is comp'ed in, (I'm talking vox) I clone it a few times, put a send on one to a hard comp, a send on another to a delay, a send on another to a chorus, and put the output of all of those to a lead vox bus and use a channel strip there, and send that to the mains. 

    It works differently for recording an acoustic guitar, or other things. You should do some trial and error and see what works best for you.

    Please pray for Foxwolfen, pray for peace for him. And an end to any deception, anger, and hatred around him or influencing him.   


    My stuff is here,  http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby 

     




    #2
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 10/7/2004
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 14, 10 11:14 PM (permalink)
    I don't think that really answers his question. I don't think he was asking about what you do with your Neuman, Avalon, Fireface...or comping, cloning, putting sends on, delay, chorus, panning, channel strips, compressor settings, eq.......As interesting as all that is...he wants to know what to do with level...should he be cranking the Input, or cranking the output of the preamp...you just told him you get settings from the manual. So, if you have time...post again coz I want to hear what people have to say about this topic too.
    #3
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 10/28/2006
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic preamp technique? April 15, 10 0:28 PM (permalink)
    2. So, how do you adjust the end product? Which is best, to gain recording level by cranking the Input, or by cranking the output of the preamp?

    Its a balancing act. You do not want to overload the input and you do not want to clip the outputs of your gain staging in the signal chain.
    Some preamps give add color to your sound so you may want to pump that up some and not pump up your sound cards preamp if your going threw both. Its give and take until you get the sound/levels you want for that project.
     
    Theres no set rules and steps for this.
     
    Its been said again and again, but use your ears and do not clip any part of the gain staging. In 24bit recording, you do not need to record a signal at -3dB. Anything form -16dB to -6dB is great
    Cj

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #4
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 1/9/2004
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic preamp technique? April 15, 10 0:30 PM (permalink)
    usually you'll crank the input to put hair on a sound (if it is that kind of preamp).  You turn down the output to make the hairy sound acceptable to the next unit in line.




    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #5
    ShadDOH
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1027
    • Joined: 12/31/2009
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 0:32 PM (permalink)
    montezuma


    I don't think that really answers his question. I don't think he was asking about what you do with your Neuman, Avalon, Fireface...or comping, cloning, putting sends on, delay, chorus, panning, channel strips, compressor settings, eq.......As interesting as all that is...he wants to know what to do with level...should he be cranking the Input, or cranking the output of the preamp...you just told him you get settings from the manual. So, if you have time...post again coz I want to hear what people have to say about this topic too.

    Well alright den. I crank the input low, and the output higher (to get the level) when recording vox? Typically the output not too high, up to neg 12. And higher on the input and lower on the output to get a warmer sound for something like bass? How's that? Higher input, lower output for more of a tube sound, or a pre-amp'ed sound? Opposite for more of a cleaner sound?

    But I still recommend the "Neuman, Avalon, Fireface...or comping, cloning, putting sends on, delay, chorus, panning, channel strips, compressor settings, eq......." thing.
    post edited by ShadDOH - April 15, 10 0:34 PM

    Please pray for Foxwolfen, pray for peace for him. And an end to any deception, anger, and hatred around him or influencing him.   


    My stuff is here,  http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby 

     




    #6
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 2:14 AM (permalink)
    Because you have gain controls on both the inputs and outputs things can get confused. There does not have to be a balancing act, you can set gain in quite a methodical and technical way.

    I have spoken in the past of using a digital reference such as the K System for signal gain. Take a -14 db K level for example. Once you have got your metering calibrated so that it shows 0 db rms with a -14 db FS level signal coming in.. then setting input levels on the way into Sonar is easy.

    Now let us assume that your input sensitivity to your audio interface is matched to the level of the previous stage eg a mic preamp. On the Mic Pre there is a setting on the output level control that offers no gain. ie a 0db setting. No attentauion or gain. I would start by setting your output level first. To this setting of no attenuation or gain. It should be indicated on most quality preamps. This is important to know when the output stage is providing no gain. This method relies on a fixed output level and only varying input level.

    Now with your metering on inside Sonar you start with the input gain right down  anticlockwise then while the signal source is present you turn it up slowly to achive the -14 db signal level coming in and being shown on Sonar. That is where the input gain is correct. If its a quiet shaker from a soft mike 1 metre away then that control may end up at 2 or 3 o'clock to achieve the desired K level. But if its a loud guitar amp or a synth it could be down at 10 o'clock. The input gain just needs to be where the correct output level is achieved going into the input to your DAW. (Once you know the correct setting for the output level. Ask the company if you dont know) This gives you nice clean signal, max headroom, minimum noise and distortion etc.

    But there is nothing wrong with really cranking up the input gain and lowering the output gain in order to achieve overdrive effects. In this mode you play with both input and output level settings. Then the output level control is your friend because it can control levels going into Sonar. Input level control for desired crunch and output level control for correct K level into Sonar.



    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #7
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 7/9/2004
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 7:10 AM (permalink)
    All of the preamps in my rack put out 24dBm before clipping while the MOTU 896 I use to digitize can handle about 16dBm before clipping.

    I use the knobs on the preamps to make the signal sound nice... and then I make sure the signal doesn't fry the MOTU.

    It's easy.

    No need to worry about a monitor level calibration protocol while tracking... you should control your monitor levels over on your monitor system.

    best regards,
    mike


    #8
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 3/29/2006
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 8:57 AM (permalink)
    it also depends on what kind of amp you have.  if you have a starved plate tube preamp, then the input (typically from the ones I've used) will add more tube distortion and the output is tied directly to the transistor gain stage.  it could be the other way around, however, if the pre manufacturer designed it differently (but that wouldn't really make sense to me to do it that way, but it could be done).

    the "balance" that everyone is talking about above applies directly to all non-starved plate tube pre designs including the true tube preamps, transformer and/or solid state designs.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #9
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 7/9/2004
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 9:18 AM (permalink)
    Another random thought...

    My API 3124+ only has one knob per channel.

    And it came with an instruction manual :-)




    #10
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 1/9/2004
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 11:13 AM (permalink)
    Mike,

    KISS an api today!

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #11
    Dave King
    Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2862
    • Joined: 11/13/2005
    • Location: Connecticut, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 3:42 PM (permalink)
    My Grace Designs pre has an LED light which is used to monitor the input level.  I use that as a reference for setting the input level and then adjust the output level to get a decent signal in SONAR.

    Dave King
    www.davekingmusic.com

    SONAR X2 Producer 64-Bit 
    StudioCat PC
    Windows 7 Home Premium, Service Pack 1 
    Intel Corel i5 3450 CPU @3.10 GHz 
    RAM 8 GB
    M-Audio Delta 44

    M-Audio MidiSport 2x2
     
    #12
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 12/4/2003
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 15, 10 11:54 PM (permalink)
    Turn the knobs until it sounds good. Then stop.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #13
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 10/7/2004
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 0:25 PM (permalink)
    The answer to every question on the forum. Middleman, you're a genius.
    #14
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 0:30 PM (permalink)
    Sorry montezuma that does not cut it and is a way too simplified answer. What if we have a bass player connected and we have turned the knobs until things sound good but without knowing it we are close to clipping. The bass does a percussive pop for some sort of funk effect and our preamp sounds bad as a result.

    My approach is more technical but gives you the minimum gain required to get the correct K level going into Sonar. Then we have max headroom, miniumum distortion etc.  But from here you can play with the controls. Lower the output control by 6 db and add 6 db gain to the input. Same level out to your sound card but now our preamp is working a little harder. And as you do more of this eg lower output level by 20db and add 20 db gain at the input we are heading into a driving crunch kind of sound which can be great.

    The sound of any stage gets more apparent as the amount of gain that particular stage is providing is increased. Compare any preamp adding 6 db of gain to 60 db of gain being added to a signal. (Interesting thing to do here is build an attenuator and on purpose lower the input signal say by 30 db but add it back in the form of gain inside the preamp) Then you hear the sound of the preamp more. This separates the men from the boys. A $5000 preamp is still going to sound great at that sort of gain but a Tascam or Mackie analog console simply does not. Not bad though!
    post edited by Jeff Evans - April 16, 10 0:31 PM

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #15
    NoKey
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 974
    • Joined: 10/28/2008
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 2:35 AM (permalink)
    Thanks everyone for the replies.

    What I've been doing is doing what some suggest, balancing till it sounds OK, but I have lost of what good is after a while.

    I think my mind saturates and, anyway, "good" kind of needs to be compared to something else, and I do have trouble keeping one quality in mind while hearing another one real time, so settings as this has made me ask this question.

    I checked briefly on the K system that Jeff mentions, and what he explains is what I was hoping to read about, without much pretense.

    When I started learning a little over a year ago, or so, I was under the impression that I would move the knobs and just leave them there forever. How naive.

    I thought the input was to match the microphone, and the rest was volume, but obviously that's not all there's to it.

    Then, on reading about the K-system that Jeff mentions, they do talk about "matching impedances", so maybe that's another factor, so I'll see if there's some more info on that.

    I also read somewhere, after I posted, that this issue can indeed get rather technical. Like, for instance, I read about for real important events engineers spend up to two days calibrating things and setting the levels. But elsewhere, I read that most good engineers can do those things without any parameters, just with their experience with the equipment they are using.

    I incline for something like that...Have some technical basis on the equipment one has, or what one is doing.

    And the truth is so far I find it hard to distinguish when I make the adjustment with the input, or do it with the output...And that's where I want to clear up on, to some degree.

    Thanks everyone, again.
    #16
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 3:26 AM (permalink)
    Hi NoKey is there a particular Mic Pre you are using by any chance. What I am suggesting is setting the output so it is not providing any gain and that thereby freezes and removes the output control. Then I am just suggesting using the input level control to obtain the correct level going into Sonar (with or without K System except K system gives you a reference levelto work with) Now you only have one control to worry about.

    Then you have just added the right amount of gain to get the signal you are after for recording purposes. Then as I said in my second post you can try lowering output gain and increasing input gain. Try and do it by actual amounts though. eg 6 db at each end etc. or more for more of a pre amped sound. Input level and oputput level controls are better if they are calibrated but many are not.

    Impedances are more about coupling the input source signal correctly into the input stage you are connecting your source to. If its a microphone then the impedance thing is basically taken care of. Most Mic Pres will present the correct impedance to the microphone. Some Mic Pres do however offer variable input impedance but then you would have to be aware of how that is going to effect the microphone signal. Bit more technical.

    Getting back to the output control. It is important to know when it starts adding gain because then the added output gain will be contributed by further stages of amplification which could also introduce a sound of its own. In some Pres it might be fully clockwise for zero gain and no attenuation. A quick email to the manufacturer would clear that up. Some Mic Pre companies might say at 12 O' Clock there is unity gain in the output stage. etc..

    I was using a hardware equivelent to the BBE Sonic Maximiser for a while and I found that the unit gave a perfectly flat frequency response for the Low and Hi ends of the spectrum when the controls were at 11 O' Clock which is stupid. It took some serious testing before I found that out. I just assumed it would be 12 O' Clock but it wasn't.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #17
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 10/7/2004
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 4:14 AM (permalink)
    Ahhh...Jeff...my last comment was dripping with sarcasm. Sorry middleman.
    #18
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 12/4/2003
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 11:17 AM (permalink)
    Ok let's cut to the chase.

    There are two extremes a mic preamp can provide.

    1. As clean as the preamp can provide
    2. As dirty as the preamp can provide.

    The balance of the input signal to the output signal determines where in this range your sound will fall for that given preamp. High output with low input means, as clean as possible. Hi input with low output means as dirty i.e. distorted, warm, saturated, possibly noisy the preamp will sound. This is independent of gain structure going into a computer or AD device. If input is high and output is high you will get a loud dirty signal, not necessarily a bad thing if that is the tone you are after.

    Also, one correction, most preamps don't have input and output controls. Some do many do not.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #19
    NoKey
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 974
    • Joined: 10/28/2008
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 7:42 PM (permalink)
    Thank you Jeff, and Middleman for your new comments, which are indeed helpful, as well as those of others.

    Jeff, I have currently three lower cost mic preamps. Two are mixers with pre-amps. One is in a 200 watt amplified mixer called Europower PMH1000, a smaller mixer/preamp called Xenix-802, and a preamp only called Tube MP-Studio. The first one I use only as amplifier, with all settings on neutral. The amp feeds 2 large Klipsch 3-way speakers, old ones, from the Hi-fi years, and also two smaller Infinity ones from the same times. I don't have monitors..I have set the speakers to sound as close as possible to the AKG-headphones, as to low and high frequencies, and as to hearing about the same on headphones as in speakers, specially on instruments. I adjust the high frequencies with the smaller Infinity ones, which are actually fed from an Altec powered system (I just removed the even smaller speakers and connected the Infinity ones in place). That also gives a subwoofer that is part of the Altec. So that's how I kind of get similar sound as from the AKG headphones, overall, but not exactly, of course.

    I use two microphones, alternatively. The better one is an AKG-C535EB which is kind of a trade-off between a condenser-studio and stage type. It uses 48 VDC, and has a switch with 4 settings.

    The other mic I use is a Telex brand unit that I have concocted into a neck-brace which I use as I play the keyboard..This is to help when I move the head, so the mic is generally close to the mouth...That one is electrect type and I put two 1.5 batteries in series for bias. The batteries are away from the mic, so the mic is very light. (On that one, I concocted a wind-screen made with pantyhose material). The AKG is mounted on an adjustable structure, and I am still not learned into playing the keys and keeping a constant volume on it. But the up-3db, or down-3db tedious task is a good motivation to improve voice-projection,  and I believe I am improving a little, to avoid that. Yes, editing the vocal waves is a good teacher, for me.

    I believe somewhere the Xenix or the Europower said to put the dials in the middle, with not much further explanation..So, for a long time that's was the criteria for me. Moving sometimes a little, either input or output. Now those two actually also have a third way to increase the signal, which they call Main-Mix. I don't move that one, as I recall. I don't use currently any other external sounds, other than mics, and sometimes my flamenco guitar, or the harmonicas. My usual playing is keyboards, I use two: lower and upper manuals.

    After reading all of the people's posts, yesterday, I did some simple tests, and found that I in general have (maybe) been setting the signals low.

    Another way I had been guiding myself is observing waves-shapes of songs I like, and watching the difference from the voice to the accompaniment, typically on simple songs that I relate to, and then, on a blind-way, kind of try to get similar shapes of mic to music relationship...Also, I kind of use them as guides for magnitudes, or overall volumes...But I am interested in using "references" or "pink noise", as I have just read in searching for K-systems. That will be slow for me, though, I gather.

    Also, lately, that I have been learning on VST's that provide ambience, resonance, compression, normalization, and so on, my mind and hearing do get confused, as to what is best as to settings of hardware knobs.

    So, what I am after is some basic criteria (technical if possible) to set those gains to begin with, and I believe that with the advise so far, I have more than plenty to settle that.

    I have not gone yet into the details of the K-system, but I believe the principles are manageable, and hopefully will help un-confuse me.

    As to the quality of the pre-amps, I believe I am the limiting factor, rather than them, so I am putting off getting any thing better so far, but not rejecting it, either. I like the fact that some preamps don't have but maybe one control..That makes sense, since so much can be done with internal software, nowdays. And I do catch the explanations of the input adding color, distortion, and that it may or not be what one wants...And those things can be done with software too!...So all those controls I have (including some EQ knobs in hardware I do have them all in the center, by the way).

    It seems to me that basically everyone is explaining somewhat the same principles, in different ways. The different explanations, I find, help unify the fundamentals things I still need to grasp. So I appreciate each and every one's.

    Thanks everyone.
    #20
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 7:52 PM (permalink)
    Recording through mixing consoles in some ways is easier. The main stereo output can be set to unity and so can the channel fader. Remove any EQ on the channel and use the Mic Gain which is the rotary control usually at the top of the mixer channel to set the gain. It is actually quite straight forward. Even if you are feeding Sonar from some sort of direct out then the level is going to be correct at the point and it is only a matter of tweaking the Mic gain to get the desired levels into Sonar.

    Even if you use a send to get the signal into Sonar, set the master send fader to unity as well and you will also be sending the right level from the desk.

    The thing to watch here is as I mentioned in a previous post it is important to set your sound card to match the levels of the signals that are going to it. eg If you sound card line input sensitivity is set to +4 dbu but the mixing console is only sending -10 dbv (which many do) then you will never get enough level into Sonar. If you are sending -10 dbv levels to your soundcard then the soundcard needs to be set or adjusted so that -10 dbv will give you a healthy level coming up on the Sonar meters. The mixer could also be sending +4dbu or even 0dbu so then the sound card needs to be adjusted as such or you will severly overload it and get distortion.

    Those Klipsch speakers were great from memory of my old Hi Fi days. They used to very effecient. But a good set of active monitors would be the go for you now too.

    post edited by Jeff Evans - April 16, 10 8:10 PM

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #21
    NoKey
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 974
    • Joined: 10/28/2008
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 8:36 PM (permalink)
    Thank you Jeff.

    I find this a good guideline and I am already trying to figure this out.

    If not too much asking, would you give some sketch as to how to set the faders or knobs to unity gain? I have the following to start with. Do I use the mic's output db's specs as a starting point?

    Each Trim knob on top of each channel has a range of [+10]10 ccw and -40 [+60] cw.  I suppose the one value is for XLR and one for 1/4 jack.

    Each corresponding LEVEL knob has a range of "infinity" ccw and +15 cw. The MainMIx Knob has the same range as the LEVELs.

    Thanks.
    post edited by NoKey - April 16, 10 8:57 PM
    #22
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 4/13/2009
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 8:54 PM (permalink)
    Yes NoKey with pleasure. If you look at the master faders and the channel fader you will see at some point about 3/4 of the way up there is a line which is often marked 0 or 0db. That is what we call unity gain. It means the signal is the same after the fader as it is before the fader.  Now most channel faders and master faders have some extra travel above that line and that is where some extra gain can be slipped in. A lot of faders offer 6 db of gain above that line some might be 10 db but there is a definite point that is unity gain. The idea is to keep all your faders at that line or below. Our trim rotary control at the top of the channel is where the real gain is added (or subtracted) . And in your case it has the ranges you indicated and yes they would be for the XLR and the Jack inputs. One is usually less sensitive than the other so a wider range of signal levels can be accomodated.

    It is important to keep your main master stereo gain at unity. This way your mixer will be running at its best. A full mix should just be hitting the 0db level on your mixers meters. Many live engineers get this wrong too. They have the master faders way down in order to match the power amp sensitivity. This causes distortion in the mixer. Power amps should be turned down to the required level while the mixer is running around 0 db. Sorry I am getting off the track.

    Hope that helps.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #23
    NoKey
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 974
    • Joined: 10/28/2008
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 9:00 PM (permalink)
    Hi Jeff,

    And thanks...I will study this on and on till I get it.

    (I edited my previous post, before this reply explaining Unity Gain..So, please disregard my editing).

    Very grateful.
    #24
    ShadDOH
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1027
    • Joined: 12/31/2009
    • Status: offline
    Re:Mic pre-amp technique? April 16, 10 10:09 PM (permalink)
    Yes, my pre's have compressors on-board? So I always compress "a little" or a little more? on the way in depending on what I'm recording? i.e., vox a little, the bass a little more....

    Please pray for Foxwolfen, pray for peace for him. And an end to any deception, anger, and hatred around him or influencing him.   


    My stuff is here,  http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby 

     




    #25
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1