SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 18:20:23
(permalink)
Keni SteveStrummerUK Save is now File>Save I'm surprised you weren't directed to use Ctl-S so that you can do it in one... I use Ctrl+S all the time Keni, the question didn't ask what we preferred Gotta use the keyboard tho.... I know it's only semantics, but does anyone really describe a keystroke as 'clicking'? Left-click/Right click etc - it's a mouse-related word shirley? Unless there's a manual out there that says something like 'click on Ctrl+S' John T will help me out, he's big on pedantry.
|
PenguiN42
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 201
- Joined: 2004/06/19 20:05:36
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 18:34:04
(permalink)
For me the biggest category would be seeing what state certain functions are in, which used to be on a tool bar, but now are only in a menu or dialog. For example, to see the auto-crossfade state: used to be 0 clicks, now is at least 1. Also another metric that's important to me is mouse distance. Changing a clip name is still the same # of clicks (3 if your clip pane isn't open), but in 8.5 you could do it all in the same general area (right click, properties, dialog is centered), and in X1 it's all the way over to the left, and you have to hit the "Clip" box. Honestly I'd like it if there were more keybindings for moving around in the inspector, that would speed some things up.
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 18:56:36
(permalink)
For me the biggest category would be seeing what state certain functions are in, which used to be on a tool bar, but now are only in a menu or dialog. For example, to see the auto-crossfade state: used to be 0 clicks, now is at least 1. At last some sanity. I don't use the auto-crossfade but I can relate to that 'cos I'd like some sort of visual indicator on the current screenset lock state without having to click on the SS module in the control bar. I can't count mine though seeing as SS are new to X1. So there is some valid input coming through all the hot air and bluster. I can't make my mind up about the clip name thing. I find it slower if I'm just renaming one clip but quicker if I'm doing a load.
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 18:58:12
(permalink)
but does anyone really describe a keystroke as 'clicking'? Depends on the keyboard. my laptop keyboard clicks, my desktop keyboard doesn't.
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 19:05:36
(permalink)
John I don't know what you're looking for here... This is a legitimate issue... If you open 8.5 with a dbl click it doesn't select all notes and in X1 it does which forces an extra click to undo... Maybe you might make your question real specific here as you seem to have a disclaimer for each item brought up... Kini I would have liked to see what you wrote in your deleted post. Now to the point at hand. What FBB is saying is that you can't simply say X1 requires more clicks for the example given because there is a new way to do it. It does not require more clicks. If you don't want the notes selected don't use a double click. Because one is trying to do the same things in the same way in X1 that they did in 8XX doesn't mean X1 requires more clicks. It means one needs to learn the new way. Once that is done X1 does go a lot faster. I recall you having a lot of trouble with the new smart tool. It seemed to me you were using it as if you were still in 8XX. Its that sort of thing that I am and I think FBB are trying to point out. I have said this so many times it should be burned in everyone's memory. Perhaps it will take at some point. The basic idea is that X1 is a totally new program. One in which we the users have to learn. We can not fall back on the ways we once did things. If the results one is getting with X1 using the old procedures are different then its time to find out how its done in X1. Don't rely on what you know about 8XX. Hi John... Nah... I don't think you would have liked what I deleted... ;-) But this is the point... If you can't do it the same way as quickly, then it has slowed. Substituting another method of sork should be addtional not a replacement... Believe me... There are time I use the alt-click to split but I can't do that with all of my work, so I 'need' the other system which is now a click and mouse move slower.... there's the comparison... Apples and apples, not apples and oranges... Different methods are fruity at best! ;-) So please note that in my eyes you're comparing things that relate but are not the same... and if we all simply accepted cakewalk's first results we'd still be back in DOS or maybe Cakewalk for windows... they do their very best to give 'everyone' what they want and I believe that by letting them know that many are uncomfortable with some of these things even after getting to know them somewhat well.... I think we'll see answers and solutions so that these will be made comfortable for all, not just those who are happy with these decisions right off... I want to see X1 improved... not go back to 8.5.3 which I do still use on many projects... I am using X1 much more now and I do find many of it's new tools to be advantageous... So I make these needs/wants known and as with feature requests, the more these issues are in the light the more they get thought about... I hope you're making some killer music with X1! Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 19:12:26
(permalink)
FastBikerBoy If you open 8.5 with a dbl click it doesn't select all notes and in X1 it does which forces an extra click to undo... TBH Keni I no haven't opened 8.5 for so long I don't know this for fact but I'm pretty sure the double click in 8.5 doesn't select the clip. The problem with X1 is that the double click selects no matter where the smart tool is in the clip. Now that is a valid complaint and IMHO something that shouldn't happen. That's a different complaint to the fact that all the notes in a selected clip are selected. That I would expect. It's inaccuracies in what actually happens that weakens many of the arguments. So someone says opening the PRV selects all notes in the clip. It doesn't, the problem is the double click selects the whole clip. If the claimed problems are inaccurate the real problem never gets fixed and that's why I think it's important to be accurate. I've already put in a FR for that as well BTW. You're quite right regarding why it selects all notes... I'm just stating that it should not! A single click selects the clip, a double click is set to open the PRV, not select the clip... So there's a bit more accuracy as well... I know that what you say is what's happening, I'm saying (again, sorry) that it should not! I've had many issues with posts here due to semantics and while I know it is important, I think that in the spirit of getting to the need, we try to read between the lines a bit with what people say... We're not all blessed with eidetic memory... ;-) So we try to correct each other when we see it in the hope of helping each other... Isn't that what the forums are for? I'm not here to be at war with anyone and I'm only too happy to ignore posts that fan flames when I can... ;-) Forgive me my old age... I once had a better memory and command of words... Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 19:14:43
(permalink)
Bub John What FBB is saying is that you can't simply say X1 requires more clicks for the example given because there is a new way to do it. It does not require more clicks. If you don't want the notes selected don't use a double click. Yeah Keni ... stop using just your mouse and use your hands and keyboard as well, it's quicker ... trust me, and technically, you only have 1 mouse click as apposed to two, so it is in fact faster, although it takes you longer. I wouldn't lie to you. Rather than double click like we used to be able to do in 8.5 ... in X1, do the following ... 1 - Click on the track 2 - Hold down the 'Alt' key 3 - Press the #3 key Good luck Keni. Bub What should I do with my 3rd hand? I've grown one just for this purpose! Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 19:18:57
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK Keni SteveStrummerUK Save is now File>Save I'm surprised you weren't directed to use Ctl-S so that you can do it in one... I use Ctrl+S all the time Keni, the question didn't ask what we preferred Gotta use the keyboard tho.... I know it's only semantics, but does anyone really describe a keystroke as 'clicking'? Left-click/Right click etc - it's a mouse-related word shirley? Unless there's a manual out there that says something like 'click on Ctrl+S' John T will help me out, he's big on pedantry. Hi Steve... I'm trying to steer clear of all the semantic issues... I need BOTH... Sometimes using kybd+mouse is fast and handy, other times it's clumsy and difficult... Click/keypress... whichever... It's a matter of how easily I get my work done and it got harder in many ways for me with X1 and does not have to be that way even allowing everyone to have the new X1 features they so love... Sonar is still Sonar... That's why they didn't change the name to a new product... The GUI and many related issues are simply a new skin... Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/27 19:22:07
(permalink)
PenguiN42 For me the biggest category would be seeing what state certain functions are in, which used to be on a tool bar, but now are only in a menu or dialog. For example, to see the auto-crossfade state: used to be 0 clicks, now is at least 1. Also another metric that's important to me is mouse distance. Changing a clip name is still the same # of clicks (3 if your clip pane isn't open), but in 8.5 you could do it all in the same general area (right click, properties, dialog is centered), and in X1 it's all the way over to the left, and you have to hit the "Clip" box. Honestly I'd like it if there were more keybindings for moving around in the inspector, that would speed some things up. Yes, I too miss some of the status info such as you mention... Does Sonar Plus show this? If not, I'll bet Ben could add it. I use Sonar Plus as if it's simply part of Sonar and it brought back the tools that I'm used to having faster mouse access to as well as many other issues he solves (I'm using his dual snap method instead of the X1c version due to the snap-follow-grid issue in it's current implementation)... Keni
|
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 03:59:56
(permalink)
FastBikerBoy Skyline_UK Opening PRV view - 8.5 opened with a default of no notes selected, X1 opens with all notes selected (ludicrous) and you have to click in a space somewhere to get to no notes selected. One extra click! QED. John More mis-information. The PRV opens with all notes selected if you double click a MIDI track hence selecting the whole track/clip. Why on earth would a selected track not have all the notes selected, there'd be yet another riot on here if you selected a track and none of the notes were selected. If however you don't select the whole track, but just make it active and then press Alt+3, open PRV no notes selected, as expected. Well, let's have the whole story. (i) In 8.5: double click with no notes selected (track selected or not) is how it worked. That was convenient, sensible (you opened the PRV to work on a note or set of notes so why on earth would you want all of them selected?), and I don't recall any complaints about that modus operandi. (ii) "make it active (one click) and then press Alt+3 (one key depression or two?)" How on earth is that as easy to do as just double clicking on the track?? A simple double click versus one click and one/two key depressions? Sorry, I can't even call that a draw.
My stuff Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive Windows 10 Home 64 bit Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8+ too many other pluginsBandLab page
|
Skyline_UK
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2133
- Joined: 2004/04/15 17:55:09
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 04:11:08
(permalink)
FastBikerBoy John FBB is the video OT to you? I think it highlights my 'agenda' of getting some facts straight........ I've learnt a thing or two myself. BTW I'm obviously happy with X1, if I wasn't I'd be using 8.5 and hanging around the other Sonar forum or on some other DAW's site forum that I'd chosen to use rather than trying to find reasons to prefer earlier versions. Bizarre............. For the record, I'm also happy with X1. When I fire up 8.5 now I find my self quite confused but all those icons for a start! I would not go back. But you mustn't assume that people are perverse and tiresome if they find some aspects of of X1's functionality irksone at times. I know you haven't said that outright but it's definitely the inference in some of your comments, c.f. above. Like many other users I refuse to subscribe to either a fanboy camp or a Luddite one - which again is the choice implied by your post above, whether you meant it or not. John
My stuff Intel Sandy Bridge i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, 4 cores, 8 threads, 16GB RAM.OS & Programs drive: 240GB SSD Data drives: 1 x 1TB drive RAID mirrored, plus extra 1TB data drive Windows 10 Home 64 bit Cakewalk by BandLab 64 bit, Studio One 3, Band In A Box 2016, Ozone 8+ too many other pluginsBandLab page
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 04:44:26
(permalink)
Skyline_UK FastBikerBoy Skyline_UK Opening PRV view - 8.5 opened with a default of no notes selected, X1 opens with all notes selected (ludicrous) and you have to click in a space somewhere to get to no notes selected. One extra click! QED. John More mis-information. The PRV opens with all notes selected if you double click a MIDI track hence selecting the whole track/clip. Why on earth would a selected track not have all the notes selected, there'd be yet another riot on here if you selected a track and none of the notes were selected. If however you don't select the whole track, but just make it active and then press Alt+3, open PRV no notes selected, as expected. Well, let's have the whole story. (i) In 8.5: double click with no notes selected (track selected or not) is how it worked. That was convenient, sensible (you opened the PRV to work on a note or set of notes so why on earth would you want all of them selected?), and I don't recall any complaints about that modus operandi. (ii) "make it active (one click) and then press Alt+3 (one key depression or two?)" How on earth is that as easy to do as just double clicking on the track?? A simple double click versus one click and one/two key depressions? Sorry, I can't even call that a draw. Yes let's have the full story......... you missed this later post........... If you open 8.5 with a dbl click it doesn't select all notes and in X1 it does which forces an extra click to undo... TBH Keni I no haven't opened 8.5 for so long I don't know this for fact but I'm pretty sure the double click in 8.5 doesn't select the clip. The problem with X1 is that the double click selects no matter where the smart tool is in the clip. Now that is a valid complaint and IMHO something that shouldn't happen. That's a different complaint to the fact that all the notes in a selected clip are selected. That I would expect. It's inaccuracies in what actually happens that weakens many of the arguments. So someone says opening the PRV selects all notes in the clip. It doesn't, the problem is the double click selects the whole clip. If the claimed problems are inaccurate the real problem never gets fixed and that's why I think it's important to be accurate. I've already put in a FR for that as well BTW. You're right I wouldn't call it a draw either.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 10:05:31
(permalink)
The thing about this is, sure you can scratch around and find instances where something takes an extra click or whatever, but on the evidence here, they're hardly the labyrinthine workflow killers of legend, are they? I mean, that thing where all the notes are pre-selected in a clip, that's some trivial stuff right there. Yeah, yeah, I know "Just because it's trivial to YOU doesn't mean blah blah". It doesn't wash. Anyone who can't get work done because of that couldn't get work done anyway. The aphorism about a bad workman's view of his tools is starting to look very apt around here lately. Yeah, yeah, I know, you're not supposed to go there. We have to assume that every difficulty someone has is first and foremost down to Cakewalk's incompetence, and not their own. Well, that doesn't wash either. An installation that crashes all the time, sure, I've got plenty of sympathy for that. Clearly, there are some configurations out there that aren't working too great, and you can certainly make the case that Sonar can be unforgiving on this front. But this "OH MY GHAD THE NOTES WERE PRE-SELECTED" stuff, really, knock it off. What a load of wind. We're being asked to believe that some people are such fine tuned workflow ninjas that they can't get anything done in the face of these changes. Well, I don't claim to be a ninja, but I've got absolutely shedloads done this year. Quite possibly the most productive year for audio work I've ever had, in fact. Obviously, I'm not doing it "right".
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 10:10:06
(permalink)
John T The thing about this is, sure you can scratch around and find instances where something takes an extra click or whatever, but on the evidence here, they're hardly the labyrinthine workflow killers of legend, are they? I mean, that thing where all the notes are pre-selected in a clip, that's some trivial stuff right there. Yeah, yeah, I know "Just because it's trivial to YOU doesn't mean blah blah". It doesn't wash. Anyone who can't get work done because of that couldn't get work done anyway. The aphorism about a bad workman's view of his tools is starting to look very apt around here lately. Yeah, yeah, I know, you're not supposed to go there. We have to assume that every difficulty someone has is first and foremost down to Cakewalk's incompetence, and not their own. Well, that doesn't wash either. An installation that crashes all the time, sure, I've got plenty of sympathy for that. Clearly, there are some configurations out there that aren't working too great, and you can certainly make the case that Sonar can be unforgiving on this front. But this "OH MY GHAD THE NOTES WERE PRE-SELECTED" stuff, really, knock it off. What a load of wind. We're being asked to believe that some people are such fine tuned workflow ninjas that they can't get anything done in the face of these changes. Well, I don't claim to be a ninja, but I've got absolutely shedloads done this year. Quite possibly the most productive year for audio work I've ever had, in fact. Obviously, I'm not doing it "right". John T you have become my hero.
|
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 10:16:09
(permalink)
You can't give many selected tracks the same ICON in "ONE GO" in SONAR X1. You could in SONAR 8.5
-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 10:21:48
(permalink)
John John T you have become my hero. Bless.
|
RLD
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1990
- Joined: 2003/11/06 10:11:26
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 11:12:35
(permalink)
John T "We're being asked to believe that some people are such fine tuned workflow ninjas that they can't get anything done in the face of these changes." Oh man...that hits the nail on the head.
post edited by RLD - 2011/08/28 11:13:38
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 11:32:48
(permalink)
Consolidation time. I do believe the count is at 2. Changing track icons & checking status of the autocrossfades.... I'm beginning to see why it's unusable.
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 12:11:07
(permalink)
Add MBT to Pool when no audio clip yet exists in the project. SONAR 6: 1. Click the Add MBT to Pool button. SONAR 7: 1. Click Insert. 2. Click Audio Track. 3. Click the transient tool button. 4. Right-click in the tracks pane next to the Audio track. 5. Hover over Pool, and click Add MBT to Pool. 6. Click the button for the tool you were using before. SONAR X1: 1. Click Insert. 2. Click Audio Track. 3. Click the Edit Filter drop-down. 4. Click Audio Transients. 5. Right-click in the tracks pane next to the Audio track. 6. Hover over Pool, and click Add MBT to Pool. 7. Hold Shift or click the Edit Filter dropdown. 8. Click the object type you were editing before or click to select it from the Edit Filter drop-down.
SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424 (24-bit, 48kHz) Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
|
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13829
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 12:13:34
(permalink)
When I first started working with X1 I was (at first) somewhat stymied by only two things. One was my inability to learn to use "D" to close the PRV. I had always closed the PRV before by clicking the little x in the upper right hand corner of the view. When you did this in the new X1, of course, it threw up the "do you really wish to close Sonar" dialog. Can't tell you how many times I cursed that dialog before finally teaching myself the new way...old habits die...but they die hard. And, second, the fact that when I entered the PRV all notes were selected and I would forget this and go to edit a note a hear the gawd-awfulest clang come from my monitors. Again...I finally learned to avoid this (mostly...I still to this day forget sometimes and am rudely awakened to reality yet again) and like John T alludes above it is no "showstopper". But this particular new feature of Sonar does continue to puzzle me as to why it was implemented. Although some (few, really) had said they prefer it this way it still seems most folks are, as I am, somewhat baffled as to how this could be an improvement...why you would want this to be the default setting...and what was wrong with the old method that it had to be changed anyway. It's no biggie. But it does seem a solution in search of a problem. Perhaps there's yet another thread that might have more traction for the never ending "old versus new" debates. Forget about objectivety altogether and just have a thread on: What seems just plain dumber in X1? I bet that would be a barn burner.
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 12:17:26
(permalink)
I do believe the count is at 2. To be fair, I think you should have to count the total number of clicks and modifier or hotkeys it takes to perform the function AND to get back to what you were doing before. Also, maybe we should start a thread about things that take fewer clicks in X1, and see how that compares.
SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424 (24-bit, 48kHz) Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 12:21:05
(permalink)
To be fair, I think you should have to count the total number of clicks and modifier or hotkeys it takes to perform the function AND to get back to what you were doing before. X1 would have an unfair advantage there, 'cos with the right screensets the answer would always be one or maybe two - one there - one back.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:Which functions require more clicks to use in X1 than in earlier versions?
2011/08/28 15:06:57
(permalink)
brundlefly I do believe the count is at 2. To be fair, I think you should have to count the total number of clicks and modifier or hotkeys it takes to perform the function AND to get back to what you were doing before. Well, we could do that. But really, I think the point here is that counting clicks is a bit silly, really. Clicking a link on a website is one click. Opening the browser in the first place is two. Does this mean opening a browser is twice as hard as clicking a link? This entire train of reasoning is strictly for idiots who first and foremost enjoy arguing on the internet. No reasonable people care about it at all.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|