Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:20:48
(permalink)
Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. Bub you will need to do an actual physical round trip latency check to get the real figures because it looks like some figures are not being reported to Sonar from the driver there. Here's a simple way to get a fairly accurate figure. http://centrance.com/downloads/ltu/ Once you get the real figure you can add the extra to Sonar's ASIO reported latency and you'll get improved timing between different types of input into your DAW.
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:21:33
(permalink)
Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. I was just yankin yer chain. However, how can your total rountrip samples be more than double mine but have less rountrip msec? That just does not make mathematical sense, unless I'm not understanding the relationship between the two.
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:23:13
(permalink)
craigb Ooo... *Snap!* *Crackle!* and *Pop!*?
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:24:18
(permalink)
Jonbouy Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. Bub you will need to do an actual physical round trip latency check to get the real figures because it looks like some figures are not being reported to Sonar from the driver there. Here's a simple way to get a fairly accurate figure. http://centrance.com/downloads/ltu/ Once you get the real figure you can add the extra to Sonar's ASIO reported latency and you'll get improved timing between different types of input into your DAW. bapu Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. I was just yankin yer chain. However, how can your total rountrip samples be more than double mine but have less rountrip msec? That just does not make mathematical sense, unless I'm not understanding the relationship between the two. Aha, now I see Jonbouy has a logical explanation.
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:30:06
(permalink)
bapu Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. I was just yankin yer chain. However, how can your total rountrip samples be more than double mine but have less rountrip msec? That just does not make mathematical sense, unless I'm not understanding the relationship between the two. Well ... the trick is ... you have to set your Project Sample Rate to 384,000. Then click Apply. Then set it back to 44100. Then click on something else, like ... oh, I dunno, one of the Dim Solo Gain settings, that way the 44100 isn't highlighted blue. ;) (IOW ... I'm messin' with ya.) By the way ...... I just noticed something ........ Apparently my middle Dim Solo setting is measured in DE's, whatever the heck that is. LOL!
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:32:16
(permalink)
Bub By the way ...... I just noticed something ........ Apparently my middle Dim Solo setting is measured in DE's, whatever the heck that is. LOL! Screen resolution? Zoom?
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:32:49
(permalink)
Jonbouy Bub No sir. That's exactly what my Properties screen looks like. Bub you will need to do an actual physical round trip latency check to get the real figures because it looks like some figures are not being reported to Sonar from the driver there. Here's a simple way to get a fairly accurate figure. http://centrance.com/downloads/ltu/ Once you get the real figure you can add the extra to Sonar's ASIO reported latency and you'll get improved timing between different types of input into your DAW. That's a handy tool to use, you mentioned it to me once a long time ago and I checked it out. IIRC, it was almost dead on with what Sonar was reporting.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:36:18
(permalink)
Danny Danzi I can actually get down to 32 with that box, but there is no need as I notice no difference using 64 samples. -Danny This is the key factor for most of us, that getting down to that 'it makes no difference' low level is low enough. The big issue then becomes one of scalability once the round trip latency is low enough not to interfere with any tracking you might want to undertake through the app. Scalability in this instance meaning how complex a project you can run without having to increase the buffer size so that you don't end up having to switch between settings when you are performing different tasks. It's one thing getting world beating low latency scores for competitions sake but it's far more convenient if you can find a spot that allows for trouble free through the app. monitoring AND glitch free arranging and mixing capabilities at a single setting. As ever Danny cuts to the meat of the issue.
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 16:37:38
(permalink)
bapu Bub By the way ...... I just noticed something ........ Apparently my middle Dim Solo setting is measured in DE's, whatever the heck that is. LOL! Screen resolution? Zoom? I don't know ... it's really weird isn't it? I did go in and tweak some things such as font smoothing and that kind of thing. Maybe it's a result of that? I see what you mean though, it does look like it's just the edge of the B cut off. It's that way even when I view it, in other words, it's not an artifact of the screen shot.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 17:05:33
(permalink)
Well ... the trick is ... you have to set your Project Sample Rate to 384,000. Then click Apply. Then set it back to 44100. Then click on something else, like ... oh, I dunno, one of the Dim Solo Gain settings, that way the 44100 isn't highlighted blue. ;) Ya scoundrel!!!... Post that figure upstairs by tomorrow you just know you'll have someone swearing he's beat you for real, because he's betterer at tweaking computers than anyone else...
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
yorolpal
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13829
- Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 19:25:46
(permalink)
First...thems some dern good readings there Bub, ol pal. They really don't look "quite right". But hey, if you're gettin em...you're gettin em. Second...I'm runnin 96 samples at 48k gettin 2ms straight and about 7 or 8ms round trip. I'm usin a MOTU audio express and can run at 64 samples but end up gettin glitches as I tend to sorta produce and mix on the fly most times. PS...I'm too much of a dimbulb to know how to post my properties screen...or anything else for that matter.
post edited by yorolpal - 2013/02/16 19:38:52
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 19:33:04
(permalink)
LOL Bub, you got me with that! I'm looking and thinking...wait a minute, he's beating me too at 128?! How is that possible?! Hahahaha! I got this other box of mine down pretty low, but like Jon said...there's really no need. I have an 18 track project up and as you can see, the cpu isn't too bad. If I pressed play, it would spike up just a little more than that. Quite a few plugs and drum modules in that project....so I don't think I could do much more before it would drop out or click and sputter, but it plays all the way through without a hiccup. It's nice to know, if I need low latency that I can do it on a card that was released in the 90's. :) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4909348/Sonar%26AsioDAWSettings32.JPG -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 20:04:36
(permalink)
Hey Danni I have an Echo Audiofire 2, love it, rock solid, but Echo units have large safety buffers unreported in Sonar. I use 128 samples and no probs playing in guitar sims in real time, but actual RTL is 12 - 15ms...look at TAFKAT's reports...
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 20:16:32
(permalink)
mgh, you can't get any lower on yours? I just got a new Audiofire 12 for the other studio and we were down to 64 without a problem. Hmm, I wasn't aware of the safety buffers. That's interesting and quite cool to know, thanks!
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 21:00:56
(permalink)
5ms latency is just way too long for me. That's why I insist that the band stack all their amps in one big pile behind the drummer and we all stand in a tight circle, no more than 2 feet away from the bass drum. It gets pretty cozy when the horn section arrives. But we're thinking about getting a trio of cute girls to sing backup and having them sit on our laps.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 21:22:20
(permalink)
bitflipper 5ms latency is just way too long for me. That's why I insist that the band stack all their amps in one big pile behind the drummer and we all stand in a tight circle, no more than 2 feet away from the bass drum. It gets pretty cozy when the horn section arrives. But we're thinking about getting a trio of cute girls to sing backup and having them sit on our laps. (Not sure about that arrangement though, maybe the bass and drummer should have their own space while you stay in another with the girls? I head that bass players have more latency too...)
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
spacey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8769
- Joined: 2004/05/03 18:53:44
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 21:35:17
(permalink)
Well I told my wife I'd just get three girl backup singers to sit on my lap and just move the speakers closer. She said, "with your luck they'll probably steal your speakers and it sounds like the only thing you have that works!". I give up.
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 21:53:14
(permalink)
spacey Well I told my wife I'd just get three girl backup singers to sit on my lap and just move the speakers closer. She said, "with your luck they'll probably steal your speakers and it sounds like the only thing you have that works!". I give up. Every year or so, I ask my wife for some money to upgrade to the new version of Sonar. She always says, (kidding around of course) "Uh!, you wasting your money on that cake stuff that never works right? When are you going to learn?", and she walks away shaking her head at me and smiling. Even my own wife picks on me because of Sonar. Why do I keep putting up with this punishment?
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re:Latency thoughts?
2013/02/16 22:15:06
(permalink)
Bub Why do I keep putting up with this punishment? Because ex-wives tend to come at you with sharp objects?
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|