Helpful ReplySonar vs. Pro Tools

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
Piotr
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 208
  • Joined: 2014/12/25 20:30:44
  • Status: offline
Re: Sonar vs. Pro Tools 2018/06/17 08:06:35 (permalink)
I think PT popularity last years resulted because of people when trying to create their own studios just copied tested solution from good known ones, from known engineers etc. So PT earned it years ago but then it was expanded by coping and trying to be compatible with others. Not by real strength against competitors. 
 
Just asking anybody experienced or 'experienced' in studio build about what to buy ended almost always answers like 'everybody use MAC in studio, everybody use PT in studio'. Kind of urban myth. And very expensive myth.
 
I have watched some videos about PT use and I am sick looking at ancient way for routing in PT and unbelievable restrictions.  Especially when looking at videos when guys even not renaming buses but saying like ' and on bus 32 we have reverb and on bus 54 we have something else and bus 72 is free so we can use it' :)
 
Well why we have computers? :) To memorize many numbers? :)
Or maybe I am wrong and it is kind of mind gym not to let us to be too lazy?
 
 

Regards,
Piotr
Sonar Platinum Lifetime
#31
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 920
  • Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
  • Location: Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re: Sonar vs. Pro Tools 2018/06/17 13:31:05 (permalink)
I've only used PT in two recording sessions, but I found it pretty easy to get to grips with right away. In many ways it felt like I was using Sonar 3.
 
The menus well laid out, and I didn't find myself endless searching through sub-menus to find what I needed.
 
It did come across as very basic in functionality however, and it seemed everything had to be done "the long way round", unlike Sonar/CbB which has a bunch of time-saving features. Even things like PDC had to be entered in manually (well at least on the version I had - I believe more expensive versions have automatic PDC).
 
I guess this is a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it makes the software much quicker to master (as there's less to learn), but on the other hand it takes much longer to get the job done when you get down to editing; although maybe this is intentional if the pro engineers are charging hourly!
 
One thing was clear though: it is WAY overpriced for what you get. At the time I thought it's only saving grace were the VSTi's that came with it, i.e. the AIR Music Tech instruments. However, I've since bought Xpand!2 for £1 from pluginboutique and upgraded it to AIR Complete for £59, so you're not really getting much for the remaining £100's PT costs.
 
In summary I'd say it's easy to use and gets the job done if somewhat in a long-winded way, but it's way overpriced.

Mark McLeod
Cakewalk by BL | ASUS P8B75-V, Intel I5 3570 16GB RAM Win 10 64 + Win 7 64/32 SSD HD's, Scarlett 18i20 / 6i6 | ASUS ROG GL552VW 16GB RAM Win 10 64 SSD HD's, Scarlett 2i2 | Behringer Truth B2030A / Edirol MA-5A | Mackie MCU + C4 + XT | 2 x BCF2000, Korg NanoKontrol Studio
#32
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1